Practical Implications of Resurrection Theology at Rock Island Arsenal, Illinois and Risen Christ Lutheran Church, Davenport, Iowa (original) (raw)
Related papers
European Journal of Theology, 2023
This article explores the content and the context of some key Old Testament passages that speak of the resurrection of the body (Is 25:8, Ez 37:1-14 and Dan 12:1-3). The results are then compared to the teaching of the New Testament about the end-time resurrection. In a third step, the article explores how the earliest church came to understand Jesus’ bodily resurrection as the first instance of the end-time resurrection and which implications his resurrection has according to the New Testament. The article concludes with some practical reflections on the meaning of the hope of bodily resurrection for the Christian life and witness today.
Theological Tutorial One 2019 Resurrection Now and Then
Theological Tutorial One: Resurrection Now and Then Our starting point: “I am thinking about Jesus' answer to the Pharisees in this morning’s NT lesson for Matins, "God is not the God of the dead, but of the living." Having met holy men, I know that heaven is not just for those whose bodies have died, as I was brought up thinking, but I don't think that is all I should take from this.” The beginning of an answer: “Yes we find or get the kingdom of heaven "at hand", close by. It is not the immediate (that is "the world"), but its neighbor, a counter to the world. The world upside down. Just as baptism is dying (Epistle to the Romans 6, Colossians 2), sins are deaths, conquests over vices are “mortifying your members,”(Colossians 3.5) so resurrections are the opposites of all these. I have risen from the deaths of my various lives so often I think of myself as "the resurrection kid". There seems to be something of the necessary play in this passage: I Corinthians 15. Set by the Anglican Book of Common Prayer for funerals it is as much about ongoing life in hac via ( vita) as in another.
ResearchGate, 2021
This presentation discussed the road to Jesus's resurrection, the evidence of his resurrection, and the implication of the risen Christ to Christianity.
Resurrection Research From 1975 to the Present: What are Critical Scholars Saying?
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 2005
An overview of resurrection research in Europe and North America during the last 30 years indicates some expected as well as some surprising trends. This study highlights six of these major research areas. The works of two representative scholars, J.D. Crossan and N.T. Wright, provide interpretive angles on these subjects. The article concludes with some comments on what is taken to be the single most crucial development at present, that after Jesus' death his followers had experiences that they thought were appearances of the risen Jesus. These early Christian experiences need to be explained viably.
Reframing resurrection: Toward a renewed and redeemed creation
2019
Jesus’ resurrection has long been a central tenet of Christian theology, and the focus of extensive debate and curiosity. Scholars have defended a physical resurrection; interpreted it as metaphor, hallucination, or deception; removed it entirely from the scope of historical inquiry; and have denied it outright. However, belying this scholarship is the propensity to assume that the language of ‘resurrection’ envisages the reanimation of a corporeal and personal body (and then defended, re-interpreted, or denied). Therein lies the problem. This thesis argues that the ancient Jewish and Christian notion of resurrection cannot be restricted within a re-animated body but includes a broad spectrum of eschatological hope, particularly the renewal of relationship with YHWH, the dispensation of justice, and the transformation of creation as a whole. Jesus’ resurrection is the fulfilment of these broader eschatological hopes and cannot be reduced to the return to life of a personal body. Con...
The most common understanding of life-after-death among contemporary Christians contemplates a spiritual state on another plane of existence. This particular belief system represents a problem for Christianity because it is inconsistent with the historic confession of the Church and has implications for the here and now. This paper explores the history of the doctrine of the resurrection of the dead and argues that the health and vitality of contemporary Christianity depend on the affirmation of this ancient teaching.
Explaining the Resurrection: Conflicting Convictions
Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus, 2005
Although explanations for the earliest Christian proclamation of Jesus' resurrection vary, certain standard arguments appear again and again. The present article introduces those explanations and those arguments as well as the essays in this theme issue of JSHJ, with a view to clarifying what they add to the traditional discussion.
‘What’s on the other side?’ The resurrection revived: A critical enquiry
2010
In a fear-filled world people are asking – perhaps more than ever – what happens after we die. This popular fascination with the end, with death and with what (if anything) lies beyond it has also influenced the theme and the direction of academic work in the theological field. For this reason, an informed analysis of the resurrection debate has become necessary – a process of analysing the different strata of understanding as they relate to current resurrection research. An effort is made to give consideration to gender and power, to birth and burial, to money and food in order to be able to situate the debates being studied. The current study asks: What if we see things differently or ask a different set of questions? In order for this to be possible, we need to develop an ethics of interpretation – not asking the expected questions, but rather: What interests and frameworks inform the questions we ask and the way in which we interpret our sources? How does scholarship echo (and even participate in) contemporary public discourses about Christian identity?
2006
AT the point at which we propose, in a short series of papers, to consider the great argument of St. Paul, in the fifteenth chapter of his First Epistle to the Corinthians, on the resurrection of the dead, the fact that there will be a resurrection of believers had been already proved. The apostle had established it, in the portion of the chapter preceding ver. 35, by the resurrection of Christ. That Christ was risen was admitted without hesitation by those to whom he wrote. Their whole faith rested upon the conviction, not only that the Lord in •whom they believed had died, but on the further truth, that He had been raised again, "according to the Scriptures" (ver. 4). In so far therefore as St. Paul had dwelt upon the fact, and even upon the remarkable chain of evidence by which it was established, he had done this, not so much for the purpose of proving it, as for the purpose of reinvigorating his readers' faith, and of bringing the resurrection of Jesus home to them with liveliness and power. Hence also the degree to which he had enlarged upon the disastrous consequences that would flow to Christian faith and life in general, if Christ had not been raised. The Corinthian Christians are now supposed to be thoroughly alive to this. No further argument upon that particular point was necessary. It followed that the universal proposition maintained at Corinth, that no one who had died would rise again, was false. One made in all YOL. J.