Reviews: Gender and Thought: Psychological Perspectives (original) (raw)
Related papers
Feminism and psychology: Analysis of a half-century of research on women and gender
American Psychologist, 2012
Starting in the 1960s, feminists argued that the discipline of psychology had neglected the study of women and gender and misrepresented women in its research and theories. Feminists also posed many questions worthy of being addressed by psychological science. This call for research preceded the emergence of a new and influential body of research on gender and women that grew especially rapidly during the period of greatest feminist activism. The descriptions of this research presented in this article derive from searches of the journal articles cataloged by PsycINFO for 1960PsycINFO for -2009
A critical examination of the concept of gender
Sex Roles, 1982
Although psychologists have become increasingly interested in such areas as sex differences, gender identity, and sex roles, the concept of gender remains ill defined. We undertake a critical review of this concept and try to show that (a) if the term gender is taken to refer to a set of biological and psychological varia• bles which are related to one another in a complex way, and (b) if gender dif ferences arc treated as differences in degree and not in kind, then the concept of gender can be used in a meaningful way to make sense of the things we ob• serve about people.
The Social Psychology of Sex and Gender From Gender Differences to Doing Gender
Psychology of Women Quarterly, 2011
The social psychology of gender is a major, if qualified, success story of contemporary feminist psychology. The breadth and intellectual vigor of the field is reflected in the following six commentaries in the broadly defined area of the Social Psychology of Gender which were commissioned for this third of four 35 th anniversary sections to feature brief retrospectives by authors of highly-cited PWQ articles. Our goal in this section's introduction to is to provide a brief history of the development of this area, placing the articles described in the commentaries into this historical context. The six papers in this special section, individually and taken together, identify significant turning points in the social psychology of gender. We focus on how, within a few brief years, the study of gender in psychology underwent massive transformation. 1
2011
Over the past century, there have been many changes in male-female relationships, in the ways men and women think of each other and of themselves, and in the societal norms for feminine and masculine behavior. The malefemale distinction has been assigned meanings and significance that have implications for work, family, leisure, and almost all aspects of social life. In fact, the differences and similarities between men and women are compelling for their personal, but also their political, economic, social, and educational implications. This chapter presents examples of active learning activities and how these experiential learning exercises are adapted to the course goals and objectives in a psychology of gender course. The focus of the chapter is on how to best integrate new research findings to the students’ existing knowledge base to create a new appreciation of these complex issues and how they influence each individual’s life.
PHILOSOPHICAL COGNITION OF FEMINIST THINKERS
PHILOSOPHICAL COGNITION OF FEMINIST THINKERS, 2019
Neurobiology does not reveal that there is a male or female mind. Neuroscience has proved that the brain circuits of a girl or a boy are connected differently, when it comes to intelligence and intellectual capabilities, it cannot be determined that one gender is superior to the other.
Women in the Point Of View of Philosophers and Psychologists: A Review Study
Academic Journal of Psychological Studies, 2016
It has been long that different views are expressed in relation to one of the two human sexes meaning the women and the extremes are made clear with careful and detailed consideration of many of these views. Sometimes, the status of women is decreased to that of animals and introduces them as controlled animals and animals in the control of men and sometimes introduces them as the sublime and unique but oppressed creature like that of Feminism. Meanwhile, we find a moderate point of view despite the doubts cast on it.
"„In the late twentieth century, after all, we are ourselves literally embodied writing technologies. That is part of the implosion of gender in sex and language, in biology and syntax, enabled by Western technoscience.“ Donna J. Haraway (1991), Simians, Cyborgs and Women. The Reinvention of Nature. London: Free Association Books, p. 128. These thoughts were the stimulus for this paper’s effort to treat the notions of ‘sex’, ‘gender’ and ‘identity’ through the controversial points of view, emerged among the feminist writings of the 1970s, the historians and psychoanalysts of the 1980s.While post-stucturalists like J. Butler are passing from gender denaturalization to the undoing of gender, brain scientists speak about a potential underestimation of innate biology at its equation with the anatomical sex; hormones and neurochemicals, constantly changing the brain state, not taken into account. ‘Gender’ constitutes in this sense the key term that is being posed and reposed, thought and rethought, done and undone. My paper will be thus divided into three parts that shall refer to a critical vision of gender categories in various discursive domains. First part will treat the intrinsic introduction of gender as notion during the feminist movements of the 1960s and 1970s in an effort to contest the naturalisation of the bipartite sex difference of men from women, male from female, in multiple arenas of struggle. Despite having passed from the ‘biological’ (sexual difference) to the ‘ontological determinism’ (desire) through the ‘social constructivism’ (power), the notion of “gender” remains trapped within the oppressive Western binarism culture/nature, and therefore the second part will explore the new ways of thinking gender that emerge in the 1990s towards a deconstruction or denaturalisation of this notion; that is, gender as representation and as subjective identity. Although Butler’s theory of performativity did succeed not only to disqualify normative analytical categories leading to univocity, such as sex or nature, but also to release both genders and their social frame of reference from any determinism, the third part will not only show in what extent this very notion of gender (as doing) is nowadays again in crisis but also inquire the possible explanations for the impoverishment of gender and therefore for the necessity of its undoing. A mysterious elsewhere will emerge as a sort of agency that motivates us and establishes our sexuality, whose full meaning we ignore. The innate neurochemical biology of Brizendine will thus broaden up the cognitive fields and open new perspectives of rethinking gender, the mysterious elsewhere and -why not?- biology itself. "