Vulnerability to disaster in the Maldives : the perception of the Maamigili and Fenfushi Island communities (original) (raw)
Related papers
Hazard, Resilience and Development: The Case of Two Maldivian Islands
2021
Due to their geophysical structure, the Maldives face various natural hazards, such as coastal erosion, rising water levels, tsunamis and other climate-related disasters. In 2004, the country was affected by the Indian Ocean tsunami, with almost 12,000 displaced persons and a further 8,500 relocated inhabitants. In the context of the country’s efforts to achieve sustainable development and face climate change, disaster risk reduction and resilience capacity are key issues. The Government is working hard to implement the Sendai Framework for Disaster Risks Reduction 2015-2030, linked to Sustainable Development Goals and the Paris Agreement. The paper considers the cases of two islands in Dhaalu Atoll – Meedhoo and Rin’budhoo – both affected by the tsunami, where social and economic resilience produced two different models of development. The tsunami hit Meedhoo hard. The island economy depends on fishing and the main threats are its small size and soil erosion. Thus, in 2006 a large ...
Living on the sinking islands. Social aspects of climate change on example of Maldives
The complex character of the effects of climate change on human communities requires extensive nterdisciplinary research, including more recognition of its social and cultural aspects. This study provides an example of this kind of research, using the example of a small island country in the Indian Ocean, Maldives. Because of its exceptional physical vulnerability to sea-level rise as a consequence of global warming, as well as its unique coral landscape, which will soon be lost, Maldives is known to the international audience as a ‘sinking paradise’. This study explores the attitudes towards the threat of sea-level rise that have been adopted by the country’s inhabitants and the cultural patterns that influence them. An in-depth case study, based on qualitative interviews, participant observation, and analysis of previously existing resources during nearly six months of fieldwork, revealed denial and disinterest on the part of Maldivians in regard to the upcoming natural disaster predicted by climatologists for their homeland. This would seem to be controversial, if one compares the reaction of Maldivians with that of certain other communities living in areas especially exposed to dangers connected with climate change. The cultural theory of risk developed by Mary Douglas and Aaron Wildavsky proved constructive in explaining this state of affairs. The theory assumes that awareness of all potential dangers is beyond human capacity; thus societies select and rank those risks which appear most important, while ignoring others. Prioritising dangers serves as a social strategy to enable day-to-day functioning. From the perspective of the Maldivians, the main issue is the introduction of democracy in recent years, which has triggered internal conflicts as well as the rise of violence, gang activity and drug use among the younger generation. Sea-level rise, on the other hand, is not considered a real danger by Maldivians. They regard it as doubtful, and even if it is a real danger, they trust in God’s will concerning their future. In addition, citizens of Maldives have always been aware of and accustomed to the changeable nature of their islands, and are also used to internal migration. A modified version of the grid-group model proposed by Mary Douglas enables the identification of the underlying rules of Maldivian society, in turn making it possible to understand why the ranking of the risks takes the form it does. According to my research findings, one of the main factors regulating cultural patterns in Maldives is reluctance to accept change ‒ change which has appeared inevitable since Maldives began to participate in world affairs following the introduction of tourism in the 1970s. To summarise, the example of Maldives proves the importance of examining various cultural environments in areas especially exposed to the negative effects of climate change. This approach not only promotes the development of a new trend in the study of the relationship between culture and nature, but suggests the application of risk management policies according to the specific cultural context of the threatened area in question.
The societal costs of disasters around the world are continuing to increase and Pacific Island countries are considered some of the most vulnerable. This is primarily due to a combination of high hazard exposure coupled with a range of social, economic, physical, and political vul-nerabilities. This article contributes to the growing body of work that aims to understand the causal factors of disaster vulnerability, but with a specific focus on small island developing states. The article first develops a framework for understanding disaster vulnerability, drawing on extensive literature and the well-established Methods for the Improvement of Vulnerability in Europe (MOVE) framework, and second, applies this adapted framework using empirically-derived data from fieldwork on Emae Island, Vanuatu to provide a working understanding of the causal elements of disaster vulnerability. Drawn from a significant body of scholarship at the time, the MOVE framework was primarily developed as a heuristic tool in which disaster vulnerability is considered to be a function of exposure, susceptibility (socially, economically, physically , culturally, environmentally, institutionally), and a lack of resilience. We posit that this adapted framework for small islands should also include historical susceptibility, and we prefer livelihood resilience (as capabilities, social capital, knowledge, participation, and human rights) over lack of resilience. We maintain that understanding disaster vulnerability holistically, which is inclusive of both strengths and drawbacks, is crucial to ensure that limited resources can target the causal factors that produce vulnerability and help safeguard and improve livelihoods in both the short and long term.
Mainstreaming disaster risk reduction into community development in the Windward Islands
2013
The Windward Islands are vulnerable to a number of natural hazards. This thesis examines the possibilities for Disaster Risk Reduction (DRR) in the Windward Islands. The Windward Islands offer a special case of “Island Vulnerability”. Island vulnerability is essentially defined as an increased probability in disaster events against what would be expected if vulnerability were to be measured against international levels of poverty, defined as Gross National Product per capita. There are three reasons for this namely the topography of islands, the site characteristics and the socio-economic setting. The topography is one where islands, largely of volcanic or coral origins, face multi-hazard experience particularly from flooding and storm surge. The site issue is that islands usually have a high ratio of coastline to land mass implying a relatively higher exposure to extreme events. The socio-economic conditions are peculiar to island including isolation, mono-agriculture and mono-indu...
Capacities in Facing Natural Hazards: A Small Island Perspective
International Journal of Disaster Risk Science, 2014
Isolated communities on small islands are often characterized as vulnerable and marginalized. We studied the recent history of Laingpatehi, a village on Ruang Island off the north coast of Sulawesi, Indonesia to show that the marginalization-vulnerability nexus can be offset by capacity and social cohesion to enable sustainable livelihoods. The island has been impacted by volcanic eruptions, earthquakes, and competition for marine resources from mainland-based fishermen. The community has shown a remarkable ability to cope and prosper in the face of a series of external hazards. We used a sustainable livelihoods approach to identify the assets that enabled the villagers to cope. Strong social cohesion was central to the ability to organize the community and confront hazards. A diversified livelihood strategy drawing on the small island environment and its coastal and marine resources, income generating activities in a distant satellite village, and significant remittances from employment in other parts of Indonesia underpinned people's capacities to face hazards. Government assistance played a supporting role. The case of Laingpatehi demonstrates how remoteness, rather than being a source of vulnerability, can provide access to existing resources and facilitate innovation. Disaster risk reduction strategies should focus more on reinforcing these existing capacities to deal with hazards and less on physical protection and postdisaster responses.
Perceptions of climate change risks and resilient island planning in the Maldives
This article explores the drivers, benefits, and challenges facing climate change adaptation in the Maldives. It specifically investigates the “Integrating Climate Change Risks into Resilient Island Planning in the Maldives” Program, or ICCR, a four-year $9.3 million adaptation project being funded by the Least Developed Countries Fund, Maldivian Government and the United Nations Development Program, and nationally executed by the Ministry of Housing, Transport and Environment of the Maldivian Government. The article asks: what is the perception of coastal adaptation in the Maldives, and what are the potential contributions from the ICCR project? To answer this question, the article summarizes eight primary sectors vulnerable to climate change in the Maldives: human settlements, critical infrastructure, tourism, fisheries, health systems, water, food security, and coral reef biodiversity. It then describes the genesis and background behind the ICCR, which addresses many of these vulnerabilities by demonstrating coastal protection measures. Benefits to the ICCR include improving physical resilience by deploying “soft” infrastructure, institutional resilience by training policymakers and enhancing good governance, and community resilience by strengthening community assets and awareness. Challenges include ensuring that adaptation efforts are enough to truly respond to climate vulnerability, lack of coordination, and short-term thinking among business and community leaders.
Re-framing island nations as champions of resilience in the face of climate change and disaster risk
As a home to important flora and fauna, with rich cultural roots and heritage, island communities are often characterized by their deep social ties with the natural environment. However, due to environmental degradation, impacts from climate change including slow (e.g. sea level rise) and sudden (e.g. hurricanes) onset events and the associated changes to livelihood structures and opportunities, islands throughout the world face increasing threats. In order to understand and appropriately address livelihood risks in these communities and to identify opportunities for resilience-building, there is an urgent need to shed light on the historical and cultural context of island societies and ecosystems. These approaches should build upon local and traditional knowledge and be grounded in established practices developed by island communities over centuries which continue to be heavily impacted by current political and economic trends. This article presents several multi-scale case studies...
Probing Risk and Vulnerability Towards Natural Disaster: A Study Upholding Disaster Pliant Culture
Vulnerability is the state of propensity to damage from revelation to stresses related with environmental and communal change, in other words, vulnerability describes the incompetence of a system, people or a unit to encounter the effects of an inimical environment. Reducing vulnerability is a vital facet of reducing natural hazard risk. Attainment of it requires a novel approach to hazard risk and changes in governmental structures and liaisons. This paper reviews research practices of vulnerability to ecological change and confronts for current vulnerability research in amalgamating with the areas of pliability and adaptation. The purpose of this study is to widen public level indicators of vulnerability and ability to acclimatize to natural hazards. The article underlines the magnitude of measuring vulnerability and affecting factors, to decrease risk and the vulnerability of humanity. This paper synthesizes the key findings within the community development research field and those within the disaster research field. This paper is expected to create a research framework for assessing relationship between risk, hazard and vulnerability.
MATEC Web of Conferences, 2018
Small Islands face some of the main problems of any coastal area due to climate change and natural disasters. This study aims to analyze the resilience of coastal communities on a small island in terms of disasters and climate change, and to identify the strategies and adaptations that communities have undertaken as anticipatory for disaster and climate change in the future. Qualitative analysis combined with quantitative methods is used in this research to provide a clear estimate of the categories of resilience in each village. The primary data was collected by using interviews and focus discussion group and secondary data acquired through the documentation on related stakeholders. The resilience index provided by the Ministry of Maritime and Fisheries Affairs is used to categorize the resilience scales of villages. The results of this study show that the human aspects and natural resources aspects have high scores in resilience, but disaster and climate change aspects; environmen...