Deborah Simonton and Anne Montenach (editors), Female agency in the urban economy. Gender in European towns, 1640–1830 (London and New York: Routledge, 2013). Pages xxii + 272. £85 hardback (original) (raw)
Related papers
6 Migrations, cycle de vie familial et mm"chi du travail Michel PROST Les divers systemes migratoires en vigueur dans la montagne alpine et leurs impacts socio-iconomiques. Le cas des Brianfonnais de la Vallouise XVle-XIX e siecle La rupture des cycles malthusiens. Dimographie, «revolution agricole» et industrialisation en Angleterre au XVIII e siecle 409 Alain CARRY Q,uels indicateurs pour le stock de formations accumulees dans la population active? 431 Erika FLAHAULT Le cilibat comme ilement d'intigration des femmes dans le salariat au XIX e siecle 441 Anne-Lise HEAD-KoNIG Dynamique dimographique, migrations, capital humain et secteurs d' activiti. Le cas de la Suisse, 1870-1930 447 Manuela MARTINI Migrations et marchi du travail dans le batiment. Le recrutement de la main-d'amvre dans une petite entreprise de la banlieue parisienne (1946-I 985 ) . 463 Fernando MENDIOLA GONZALO
Historia Agraria, 2021
The aim of this debate article is to promote a discussion of a historiographical nature (not ideological, not political) about the meaning, place and role of gender in both the rural past and the rural historiography. The discussion revolves around a variety of questions, ranging from the relevance, the opportunity and the very history of the use of gender category in rural history, to the analysis of gender (im)balances in the community of historians working in this broadly defined field of studies, not to mention the very definition of what is meant by gender. These and other related topics, for which there are no single or definitive answers, are debated here in a roundtable format.
Gender & History, 1999
Work has been at the centre of feminist historical research in many countries since the 1970s. Influenced and challenged by the development of social history and the Marxist paradigm prevailing in the field, feminist historians in Britain, France, the USA, Germany, and in other countries, set out to document the historical patterns of the sexual division of labour in industrial societies; women's constantly subordinated position in the labour market; the connections between their paid and unpaid work; and their experiences of and responses to exploitation. Debates about the relations between women and the labour movement, between feminism and socialism or between patriarchy and capitalism radicalised this enterprise according to the different historical traditions and political circumstances prevailing in each country. As studies proliferated in the 1980s, it became clear that the issue of women's work in industrial societies took to task the established wisdom in the history of work in a variety of ways: by documenting women's presence in workplaces, unions, and protests, feminist historians integrated women into labour history and called into question the public/private divide; by highlighting the inability of the analytical categories of traditional labour and working-class history, such as class consciousness, skill, or wage, to incorporate the experience of women workers, they criticised its implicit masculinist assumptions; and by investigating the varying contents and meanings of femininity and masculinity at play in labour relations, they stressed the importance of gender in processes of class formation. Soon after the 'new' labour history turned from the study of working-class institutions to the study of class formation through social and cultural transformations, feminist historians turned from women to the conceptualisation of gender as an analytical category of historical analysis, a shift closely related to the growing interest in questions of identities and the increasing awareness of the significance of cultural factors in the gendering of work and class identities. 2 This process was not linear and presented significant variations depending on the national traditions of both labour history and women's history scholarship.
Workshop: [Wo]Menpower! Frontier research approaches in gender and labour histories
Workshop program, 2021
The workshop [WO]MENPOWER! Frontier research approaches in gender and labour histories intends to highlight the different aspects of epistemological nature that characterize the current gender and labour histories. The papers will be structured around the most innovative and original methodological approaches such as intersectionality, anthropology, economy, oral history, data science, micro-spatial, and public history. In the communications, particular attention will be paid to the situation of the Upper Adriatic. The workshop will be held on 13-14 May via Zoom (link: https://uni-lj-si.zoom.us/j/94218996256; ID Zoom: 942 1899 6256). Registration is not required. The event is open to the public. The workshop is organized in the framework of the MSCA-IF Project 2019 “We Can Do It! Women’s labour market participation in the maritime sector in the Upper Adriatic after the World Wars in an intersectional perspective” (acronym: WeCanIt; grant agreement no. 894257).
The Gender Division of Labour: The Case of Tuscan Smallholders
What explains the gender division of labour in preindustrial economies ? Although men and women frequently do different types of labour in any given society, men's and women's tasks vary considerably across different societies. In some societies, women engaged in trade and agriculture (in parts of Africa, for example) ; though these were men's duties in others (in parts of Europe, for example)." At the same time, European historians discovered that women often engaged in tasks, such as agricultural labour and commerce, that were often assumed to be the domain of men,# again suggesting a wide variation in the gender division of labour. Understanding the division of labour in preindustrial economies is important, because these historical cases often serve as implicit or explicit referents for understanding how much -or how little -has changed in contemporary societies.
Historical Review, 2019
Cristina Borderías. university of Barcelona. ORCId: 0000-0002-9351-3432. This research was funded by the ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (haR2014-57187p and haR2017-0840p). preliminary versions of this article were presented in the sessions "Women's uses of Time in Europe in historical perspective Times (16th-19th Centuries): sources and methods" (EsshC 2016) and "Crises, gender and adaptive Family Economies in mediterranean Europe (late 18th-20th Centuries): Concepts, definitions and methods", athens, 29 may 2017. I would like to thank manuela martini and Leda papastefanaki, as well as the other workshop participants, for their helpful feedback. I am also indebted to Jörg Baten, Raffaella sarti and to the anonymous reviewers, for their useful comments.