Malaysia’s role in two South-East Asian insurgencies: ‘an honest broker’? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Malaysia’s Role on The GPH – MILF Peace Process, 2001-2015: Peacebuilding Theory
Malaysia’s Role on The GPH – MILF Peace Process, 2001-2015: Peacebuilding Theory, 2016
The conflict between the Government of Philippines (GPH) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF) is now comes to an end. The conflict has surely threatened the neighbours’ political, security and economic interests. This conflict has also raised concerns for the regional countries, in general, and, Malaysia, in particular, to resolve it due its far-reaching implications to the region as a whole. It is necessary to know that Malaysia has played a significant role in resolving the conflict between Manila government and the MILF. Thus, the purpose of this study is to analyse Malaysia’s role in resolving the conflict between the GPH and the MILF. It is divided into three parts. The first part analyses the political role of Malaysia. The second part examines the socio-economic role of Malaysia. The last part explains the security role of Malaysia. The data for this study were collected mainly from both primary and secondary sources. The primary sources include speeches, agreements, and communiqués. Interview with knowledgeable person was also conducted. The secondary sources include books, journals, magazines and newspapers. The study indicates that Malaysia played very significant role through employing effective diplomatic approach in resolving the conflict between the Manila government and MILF in the Southern Philippines. Indeed, through Malaysia’s mediation, elusive peace agreement, Comprehensive Agreement of Bangsamoro (CAB), was signed in March 27, 2014 which may pave away to a lasting peace in the region. Keywords: Conflict, diplomacy, peace, security, war ABSTRAK Konflik antara kerajaan Filipina dengan Barisan Pembebasan Islam Moro kini telah berakhir. Konflik yang berlaku di rantau ini sedikit sebanyak telah memberi ancaman terhad aspek keselamatan, ekonomi dan kestabilan politik di negara-negara jiran dan ianya telah menimbukan kesedaran serantau secara amnya, dan Malaysia khususnya untuk membantu mengakhiri konflik tersebut kerana ianya telah memberi implikasi yang meluas terhadap rantau ini secara keseluruhannya. Oleh itu sangat penting untuk kita etahui bahawa Malaysia telah memainkan peranan penting dalam proses perdamaian ini. Dengan itu, tujuan utama kajian ini adalah untuk menganalisis peranan Malaysia dalam menyelesaikan konflik antara Kerajaan Filipina dengan BPIM. Ia dibahagikan kepada tiga bahagian. Bahagian pertama menganalisis peranan politik Malaysia. Bahagian kedua mengkaji peranan sosio-ekonomi Malaysia dan bahagian terakhir menerangkan peranan keselamatan Malaysia. Maklumat atau data kajian ini diperolehi dari sumber-sumber primer dan sekunder. Sumber primer termasuk ucapan, perjanjian dan persidangan. Temubual dengan individu juga dijalankan. Sumber sekunder pula termasuklah surat khabar, dan buku-buku telah dirujuk. Kajian ini telah menunjukkan bahawa Malaysia telah memainkan peranan yang sangat penting dengan menggunakan pendekatan diplomatik yang yang signifikan dalam menyelesaikan konflik antara kerajaan Manila dan Barisan Pembebasan Islam Moro di Selatan Filipina. Malahan, melalui perantaraan Malaysia, sebuah perjanjian damai yang selama ini dielak, iaitu Perjanjian Komprehensive Bangsamoro telah berjaya ditandatangani pada 27 Mac 2014 yang membawa kepada keamanan yang berpanjangan di rantau itu. Kata kunci: Konflik, diplomasi, keamanan, keselamatan, peperangan
Forging a New Philippine Foreign Policy, 2014
The aim of this article is to discuss how the Philippines enhanced its national security by forging a more pragmatic foreign policy vis-à-vis its ties with Malaysia. The two countries have a long-standing dispute over the territory of Sabah. This article argues that with the advent of secessionist movements in Mindanao, the Philippines maintained a dormant claim to Sabah in order to gain Malaysian support for a peaceful solution to the Mindanao problem.
Malaysia – Indonesia Conflict: In the National Interpretation 1963 – 2010
Journal of Namibian Studies : History Politics Culture
The people of Malaysia and Indonesia established kinship relations long before the two countries were formed which gave rise to similarities in culture, customs, and habits. However, in reality, the national perspective of each country is not always in line, thus triggering the ups and downs of bilateral relations between the two neighboring countries. Through this research, the examiners wish to gain a comprehensive understanding of the perspectives of the two countries' nationalities from geo-strategy, geo-economic aspects, socio-cultural geography aspects, as well as defense and safety aspects. . These aspects show a fairly high dynamic, as can be seen from the ups and downs of Indonesia-Malaysia relations between 1963 and 2010. To obtain an accurate analysis, data was extracted directly from leading information providers from both countries who have knowledge and experience. Knowledge of the object under study, such as former government officials who were involved in foreign...
Managing Malaysia–Indonesia relations in the context of democratization: the emergence of non-state actors Khadijah Md. Khalid1 and Shakila Yacob2,* + Author Affiliations 1International Institute of Public Policy and Management (INPUMA), University of Malaya, Level 3, Block C, City Campus, Jalan Tun Ismail, 50480 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia 2Department of History, Faculty of Arts & Social Sciences, University of Malaya, 50603 Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia ↵*E-mail: shakila@um.edu.my Received May 20, 2011. Accepted December 26, 2011. Abstract This paper argues that Malaysia–Indonesia relations have become increasingly problematic and complex to manage in a post-Mahathir/Suharto era. The unequal pace of the democratization pattern in both countries has largely contributed to this state of affairs. The four key ‘transnational’ variables or determinants such as migrant labor, mass media, non-governmental organizations and the Anwar factor have significantly impacted on Malaysia's ties with Indonesia against the backdrop of the unequal domestic political changes. These four variables have over the years become more prominent in bilateral relations – often in negative terms. More specifically, they represent the dynamics of the people-to-people dimension in bilateral ties. As such, the deterioration in people-to-people relations threatens to significantly reshape government-to-government diplomacy. Bilateral relations could yet face their severest contradictions when official diplomacy is incapable of reflecting accurately popular sentiments. In effect, the roles of state and non-state actors have been instrumental in influencing recent developments of Malaysia–Indonesia relations. © The author [2012]. Published by Oxford University Press in association with the Japan Association of International Relations; all rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com
Mediating Civil Conflicts in Southeast Asia: Lessons from Aceh and Mindanao
Journal of ASEAN Studies, 2020
Southeast Asia has been a hotbed of intractable civil conflicts motivated by several issues such as ethnicity, ideology, and historical injustice, among others. Despite the intractability, there have been instances when third-party assistance through mediation has been vital in achieving peace agreements in the region. Using the cases of the third-party mediation of the conflicts in Aceh, Indonesia and Mindanao, Philippines, this research identified the kinds of mediation and qualities of mediators that led to the achievement of peace agreements in these two cases. This research mainly focused on path dependence, critical junctures, and periodization approaches in the comparative analysis of Aceh and Mindanao third-party mediation through a qualitative examination that involved comparative process tracing (CPT), a two-step methodological approach that combines theory, chronology, and comparison. The results showed that the mediators instrumental to the Aceh and Mindanao peace agreements allayed the commitment issues of the negotiations and ensured the trust and confidence of the conflict parties. Thus, mediators should create relations of trust among parties and a mediation environment where the commitment fears are relieved through the promise of third-party monitoring.
IAEME PUBLICATION, 2020
With the widespread occurrence of violence and ethnic conflicts globally, many countries have increasingly found themselves in a situation where they have failed to address their internal conflicts without mediations from external entities. Thus, the objective of the study is to examine and analyze the effectiveness of Malaysia’s model of third party intervention to the Bangsamoro conflicts. It concentrates on the strengths and weaknesses of the peace building model of third party intervention as pursued by Malaysia. This paper is divided into two parts. The first part discussed Malaysia’s quiet diplomatic approach in dealing with the Bangsamoro conflict, while the second explained the inclusivity of Malaysia. In view of this study found that Malaysia’s model is effective and workable. It may have some who were left out, but they were all consulted by both the Government of the Philippines (GPH) and the Moro Islamic Liberation Front (MILF), as opposed to other processes such as the Organization of Islamic Country (OIC) mediated Good Regulatory Practice (GRP) - Moro Nation Liberation Front (MNLF) peace negotiations. Therefore, there is nothing that resembles the inclusivity of the GPH-MILF peace process that characterized the exclusivity of the GRP-MNLF peace process
Malaysia-Indonesia Relationships and the Future of Southeast Asia Stability
The main purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of Malaysia-Indonesia relationships toward the condition of stability in Southeast Asia. In particular, this paper aims to prove that Malaysia-Indonesia partnerships will be still significant for the future of stability in Southeast Asia. It finds that Malaysia-Indonesia relationships would play a central role to keep as well as to strengthen stability in Southeast Asia in the future. Malaysia and Indonesia would be expected to take a new initiative, as it had been shown in the decade of 1960s and 1970, to create a circumstance in which violence conflict among countries in the region is less desirable. The fact of rapid development of military posture in Southeast Asia is primary factor of this need. Moreover, they need to start dialogues regarding push It would be significant, first, by making sure that the development of nuclear capability in in preventing the emergence of major conflict in the region by initiating a scheme through which countries in Southeast Asia are able to avoid the use of military means to solve the dispute. However, efforts to do those responsibilities would be challenged by the problems of slowly nuclear expansion and. and to propose an alternative regional arrangement for making sure that those problems would not put at risk the condition of stability in Southeast Asia. "Regionalism's main contribution to a more stable order lies in the relations of the SouthEast Asian states with each other. The growth of dialogue can be expected to lower threat perceptions, suggest alternative means of resolving conflicts of interest and open channel for mediation and conciliation" Philip Darby 1 The main purpose of this paper is to examine the impact of Malaysia-Indonesia relationships toward the condition of stability in Southeast Asia. It problematises whether or not the condition of Malaysia-Indonesia relationships will be significant for the stability in Southeast Asia, particularly in the age of globalization. Nowhere in Asia Pacific is such considerable positive progress in security and stability more apparent than Southeast Asia. It experienced what so called "Balkan of Asia" during