Complex Networks in and beyond Physics (original) (raw)
Physicists study a wide variety of phenomena creating new interdisciplinary research fields by applying theories and methods originally developed in physics in order to solve problems in economics, social science, biology, medicine, technology, etc. In their turn, these different branches of science inspire the invention of new concepts in physics. A basic tool of analysis, in such a context, is the mathematical theory of complexity concerned with the study of complex systems including human economies, climate, nervous systems, cells and living things, including human beings, as well as modern energy or communication infrastructures which are all networks of some kind. Recently, complexity has become a natural domain of interest of the real world socio-cognitive systems, linguistics, and emerging systemics research. The phenomena to be studied and understood arise from neither the physical laws nor the abstraction of mathematics. The challenge is to discern and formulate plausible mathematical structures to describe problems that represent vague human goals.
Related papers
Understanding Complex Systems: A Communication Networks Perspective
2007
Recent approaches on the study of networks have exploded over almost all the sciences across the academic spectrum. Over the last few years, the analysis and modeling of networks as well as networked dynamical systems have attracted considerable interdisciplinary interest. These efforts were driven by the fact that systems as diverse as genetic networks or the Internet can be best described as complex networks. On the contrary, although the unprecedented evolution of technology, basic issues and fundamental principles related to the structural and evolutionary properties of networks still remain unaddressed and need to be unraveled since they affect the function of a network. Therefore, the characterization of the wiring diagram and the understanding on how an enormous network of interacting dynamical elements is able to behave collectively, given their individual non linear dynamics are of prime importance.
2004
An outline of recent work on complex networks is given from the point of view of a physicist. Motivation, achievements and goals are discussed with some of the typical applications from a wide range of academic fields. An introduction to the relevant literature and useful resources is also given.
Complex Networks: Statics and Dynamics
2007
We present some of the results obtained during the last 8 years about complex networks. Starting with the collection of data in the form of networks or graphs, we proceed on the characterization at different scales: microscopic, macroscopic, and mesoscopic. We introduce also the basic models incorporating complexity in the pattern of connectivities. Finally we review some results on dynamical features on complex networks.© 2007 American Institute of Physics
Routledge Handbook of Systems Thinking, 2021
Network theory has broad application in the physical, natural, and social sciences. The study of complex networks , and their applications to the study of complex systems, have focused predominantly on: (1) the elemental vertex-edge structure (a.k.a., nodes and relationships), and subsequently (2) the dynamics that occur as a result of this basic structure (e.g., diameter, distribution , small world, contagion, etc). This network theory methodology has provided powerful quantitative tools in the interdisciplinary study of complex systems, and has enriched our thinking about them. However, the simplifying assumptions of the network theory framework have also informed the field of systems thinking, sometimes to its detriment. Network-thinking tends to shoehorn a number of important elemental structures of complex systems into node-edge relational structure. By assigning these elemental structures to edges, both elemental and emergent complexity can be lost. This paper articulates how DSRP Theory can enrich network thinking about complex systems by: (1) identifying the elemental structures that are typically hidden in network models, (2) quantifying their nature and abundance, and (3) explicating their potential contribution to the intrinsic function and emergent complexity of systems. Specifically , we detail several DSRP heuristics for determining how many elements potentially exist in any network model, demonstrating the effectiveness of DSRP as a "universal cognitive grammar" for identifying and analyzing the structural potentials in complex systems.
Form and function of complex networks
2004
Abstract Networks are all around us, all the time. From the biochemistry of our cells to the web of friendships across the planet. From the circuitry of modern electronics to chains of historical events. A network is the result of the forces that shaped it. Thus the principles of network formation can be, to some extent, deciphered from the network itself. All such information comprises the structure of the network. The study of network structure is the core of modern network science.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.