Book Review: Tobias Gossling, Leon Oerlemans, Rob Jansen (eds.) Inside Networks: A Process View on Multi-organizational Partnerships, Alliances and Networks Edward Elgar: Cheltenham 2007. 0-84542-784-X (original) (raw)
Related papers
Functioning network structures: the role of collaboration processes and their management
2013
The purpose of this paper is to broaden the understanding of network processes (Doz, 1996) and network management (Agranoff and McGuire, 2001; Järvensivu and Möller, 2009) by using Social Network Analysis (Bonacich, 1987; Borgatti and Forster, 2003; Cross, Parker and Borgatti, 2002) and additional qualitative data. We study the structure of the network to understand the success or failure of the studied networking process and its management. We divide our findings into three managerial and theoretical contributions. Firstly, we suggest that a network should foremostly concentrate on the development of the network before allocating majority of the time and resources to the development of the substance. Development of the substance refers to, for example new innovative services for elderly care or product development in gaming industry. The development of the network instead refers to the creation of trust and commitment. We comprise the findings into a framework of evaluating collabo...
Given the recent accumulation of research on inter-organizational relations and networks and the current fragmentation of the field, it is time to take stock and explore the achievements of, and future challenges for, this field of study. On the basis of a network analysis of the 158 articles on inter-organizational relations and networks that were published in four leading journals from 1980 to 1996, this paper empirically explores the linkages among, and configurations of, core theories and concepts underlying earlier empirical research on inter-organizational relations and networks. We identify core, as well as peripheral, areas of research interest in the field and point out areas of overlap and consolidation. Moreover, our empirical analysis shows that the field segments into four substantive research perspectives, namely social network, power and control, institutional, and institutional economics and strategy clusters. In sum, we suggest an innovative, empirically grounded approach towards a literature review that aims at a synopsis of a field of study and highlights possibly fruitful avenues for future research.
The literature on networks is by now quite extensive. From social networks to organizational networks and beyond, networks have been and continue to be an emerging and developing field of study that has spanned many disciplines, including, but not limited to, organizational theory and behavior, strategic management, business studies, health care †The authors would like to thank Joe Galaskiewicz for his insights and comments during the development of this article. science, physics, and psychology. In recent years, there have been a number of review articles on social and organizational networks, most recently by and by . In general, there has been considerable progress in understanding what networks are, how they are structured, how they operate, and even how they develop.
Organization Studies, 1998
Given the recent accumulation of research on inter-organizational relations and networks and the current fragmentation of the field, it is time to take stock and explore the achievements of, and future challenges for, this field of study. On the basis of a network analysis of the 158 articles on inter-organizational relations and networks that were published in four leading journals from 1980 to 1996, this paper empirically explores the linkages among, and configurations of, core theories and concepts underlying earlier empirical research on inter-organizational relations and networks. We identify core, as well as peripheral, areas of research interest in the field and point out areas of overlap and consolidation. Moreover, our empirical analysis shows that the field segments into four substantive research perspectives, namely social network, power and control, institutional, and institutional economics and strategy clusters. In sum, we suggest an innovative, empirically grounded approach towards a literature review that aims at a synopsis of a field of study and highlights possibly fruitful avenues for future research.
Systemic View of Interorganisational Relationships: An Analysis of Business Networks
Systemic Practice and Action Research, 2006
Business networks are formed by organisations with common interests. Inter-firm relations can bring to the companies involved an important contribution in the innovation processes: stimulating the division and sharing of scientific and technical information. This union between companies seems to be an appropriate alternative to promote the organisation's effectiveness. Considering the relevance of inter-organisation networks, their consolidation and the need to understand their essence as a mechanism of competitive advantage, this study is a theoretical reflection on the development of business networks and their proliferation. Using multiple perspectives, the paper discusses the classic authors, as well as contemporary references. It also analyzes the concept of networks and their importance, from a system's perspective. The systemic analysis emphasizes a holistic interpretation, considers the environment, the interdependence of the parts and the business inter-organisation actions. More than a theory, the systemic view can be understood as a model of empirical analysis, used to better understand complex phenomena. Considering inter-organisational relations, the systemic approach consists of the mechanism to understand the dynamics of business networks, their interface, especially considering their role in gaining a competitive advantage. The results discussed in this paper can bring a rich understanding of the role of networks for companies that participate in this initiative.
Critical and Inhibiting Success Factors in Interorganizational Networks
Multilevel Approach to Competitiveness in the Global Tourism Industry, 2020
This chapter, based on a single case study, has as its main objective to analyze a real example of creating an inter-organizational network and to perceive what was done for the selection and creation of the strategic partnerships and inter-organizational network and what factors or conditions can inhibit these partnerships from having long-term success and throughout its life cycle. For this, a qualitative study based on action research and semi-structured interviews was conducted. Results show although many companies settle in inter-organizational networks to gain competitive advantage, cases of failure are still quite high. In this case, upstream partnerships have not been based on long-term trust and commitment, which has jeopardized the continuity of the network, although there is an express desire to re-establish contacts. The partnership established downstream did not show the same commitment to continue the partnership with a total termination of the relationship.
Connecting organizations: Developing the idea of network learning in inter-organizational settings
Systems Research and Behavioral Science, 2008
The purpose of this paper is to introduce a form of analysis that is important in the development of inter-agency working and partnerships. Social network analysis is being seen as increasingly important in understanding inter-organizational life. The paper will introduce the idea of network learning, which is in principle a way of making social networks explicit and using an understanding of them as a part of a learning process for partnership development. The paper will also argue for a practice of network learning which integrates social network analysis with Soft Operational Research. This combination, it will be shown, provides further insights into understanding collaboration (a systems-level phenomena) in inter-agency networks or partnerships. These ideas will be described and reviewed in detail via a case study.
Economia Global E Gestao, 2012
CEOs use cooperation networks among companies as strategies to perform in the market. However, it is argued that studies on this kind of cooperation, from both a theoretical and an empirical point of view, have overemphasized the reasons and benefits of cooperative strategies, and under emphasized the factors that lead some companies to withdraw from horizontal networks. Thus, the objective of this work is to develop a conceptual framework for analyzing the factors that lead companies to withdraw from their collaborative arrangements. The conceptual framework proposed lists three stages during the formation and development of the networks: 1) background for collaboration; 2) collaborative processes, and 3) perceived outcomes of the collaboration. In simplified terms, it can be said that different aspects are related to the output of company networks, and the evolution of the network depends on its capacity to overcome the stages of development.
European Journal of Political Research, 1992
Abstract. Most of the current work on network analysis tends to concentrate on the relationship between actors and the context within which various actors engage in the formulation of public policy. Consequently, analysis of the inter-organizational structures through which this policy is implemented receives less attention. In this article attention is drawn to questions concerning the management of inter-organizational networks as the vehicles for carrying out policy programmes. At the same time, an argument is made for using the term ‘network’not only as an analytical concept but also to denote collectivities that are consciously constructed for the realization of purposeful joint action.