Conducting Research on the Internet and its Governance (original) (raw)
Related papers
Internet Governance; is it possible, desirable and likely?
The project offers an introductory analysis to the vast topic of the Internet Governance. The work is divided in several parts, following the standardized structure of state of the art, methodology, analyses and conclusion. Methodology this time is case analyses, which is applied in different contextes (the role of the Internet during the so called "Arab spring", Wikipedia and the case of the "Virgin killer" and the Stop Online Privacy Act). The work offers and overview of the cases and a direct application of the theoretical chapter to these. This is a semestral project submitted at Roskilde University, Denmark, in 2011.
The Impact of Internet Technology to The Regulation and Control Mechanisms
Yetiskin, E. (2005) "The Impact of Internet Technology to The Regulation and Control Mechanisms", The 3rd International Communication Symposium, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, 315-328, 2005
Since internet is a socially constructed technology, it is possible to assert that the efforts for controlling internet may also represent the endeavours for controlling the society. If the functioning and the institutional mechanism of internet technology are clearly defined, it can be possible to illuminate how different parts of the society is attempted to be organized and regulated. Today, internet is attempted to be controlled and set in a legal framework, nevertheless, when differences and incongruity of national law systems are taken into account, a unilateral regulation cannot be relevant. Therefore, the initial aim of this paper is not to discuss the ways to regulate the internet but to find an answer how the regulation process is realizing. Benefiting from Gilles Deleuze and Felix Guattari’s “minor politics” and “control societies” theory, this article is one of the primary works which attempts to compare and implement the design, institutional and organisational structure of internet technology to the social dynamics of society focusing on the actual developments of internet regulations. Furthermore, making a comparison between the functioning of internet technology and the society, it attempts to emphasize how gaps, created either by so called “system and code breakers” or minor movements of society are filled so that the control can be realized. The main methodology is based on the literature review and the content analysis of the design and institutional structure of internet technology, The Sixth Framework Program of the EU, popular films about hackers and finally the developments about internet regulations. The paper reached to the conclusion that internet regulation does not merely reflect the control of technology, but it also indicates the control inherited in each part of society. In this process, communication will be vital as to its role for enabling the functioning of control and regulation mechanisms.
Cahiers Lamy Droit de l'Informatique et des réseaux, 2001
General rights Copyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights. • Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research. • You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain • You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal ? Take down policy If you believe that this document breaches copyright please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim.
In January 2010, after a troubled process, the French law for “creation and Internet”, commonly known as Hadopi 2, was finally adopted in an amended form. The enacted text was the result of corrective action undertaken by the Conseil constitutionnel (France’s highest constitutional authority), through Decision No. 2009-580 DC of the 10th of June 2009. The Conseil examined the mechanism of sanctions introduced by the regulatory measure assessing the compliance with fundamental rights and freedoms, such as the presumption of innocence, the separation of powers, the right of defense, the right to fair trial, the respect of the right to be heard and the necessary compromise between copyright and freedom of expression and communication.