Practices, theories, and traditions: Further thoughts on the disciplinary identities of English and communication Studies (original) (raw)

This paper explores the disciplinary identities of English and Communication Studies through a three-dimensional model that analyzes academic fields based on practices, theories, and traditions (Axis A), field boundaries (Axis B), and cultural sites (Axis C). The author discusses the advantages and disadvantages of the fragmented nature of rhetorical studies as an interdiscipline and advocates for fostering cross-disciplinary dialogues to enhance cooperation and understanding among scholars. The paper concludes by reflecting on the hierarchically organized nature of academic disciplines and their transformative relationship with everyday practices, emphasizing the importance of continuing discussions about shared histories, theories, and practices within the rhetorical community.