A Comparison of Effects of Broad-Spectrum Antibiotics and Biosurfactants on Established Bacterial Biofilms (original) (raw)

Antimicrobial substances and effects on sessile bacteria

Zentralblatt für Bakteriologie : international journal of medical microbiology, 1999

Biofilms occur in natural aquatic ecosystems and on surfaces of biomaterials. They are generally associated with clinical infections predominantly of prosthetic hip joints, heart valves and catheters. Sessile microorganisms may be intimately associated with each other and to solid substratum through binding to and inclusion into exopolymer matrices on biofilms. The establishment of functional colonies within the exopolymeric matrices generate physico-chemical gradients within biofilms, that modify the metabolism and cell-wall properties of the microorganism. A consequence of biofilm growth is an enhanced microbial resistance to chemical antimicrobial agents and antibiotics. Investigations on the antimicrobial efficacy of antibiotics, antiseptics and antimicrobial heavy ions, however, gave controversial results. No single antimicrobial substance has been developed for the efficient eradication of adherent bacteria. This review elucidates the mechanisms of microbial resistance in biof...

Strategies for combating bacterial biofilms: A focus on anti-biofilm agents and their mechanisms of action

Virulence

Biofilm refers to the complex, sessile communities of microbes found either attached to a surface or buried firmly in an extracellular matrix as aggregates. The biofilm matrix surrounding bacteria makes them tolerant to harsh conditions and resistant to antibacterial treatments. Moreover, the biofilms are responsible for causing a broad range of chronic diseases and due to the emergence of antibiotic resistance in bacteria it has really become difficult to treat them with efficacy. Furthermore, the antibiotics available till date are ineffective for treating these biofilm related infections due to their higher values of minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) and minimum bactericidal concentration (MBC), which may result in in-vivo toxicity. Hence, it is critically important to design or screen anti-biofilm molecules that can effectively minimize and eradicate biofilm related infections. In the present article, we have highlighted the mechanism of biofilm formation with reference to different models and various methods used for biofilm detection. A major focus has been put on various anti-biofilm molecules discovered or tested till date which may include herbal active compounds, chelating agents, peptide antibiotics, lantibiotics and synthetic chemical compounds along with their structures, mechanism of action and their respective MICs, MBCs, minimum biofilm inhibitory concentrations (MBICs) as well as the half maximal inhibitory concentration (IC 50) values available in the literature so far. Different mode of action of anti biofilm molecules addressed here are inhibition via interference in the quorum sensing pathways, adhesion mechanism, disruption of extracellular DNA, protein, lipopolysaccharides, exopolysaccharides and secondary messengers involved in various signaling pathways. From this study, we conclude that the molecules considered here might be used to treat biofilm-associated infections after significant structural modifications, thereby investigating its effective delivery in the host. It should also be ensured that minimum effective concentration of these molecules must be capable of eradicating biofilm infections with maximum potency without posing any adverse side effects on the host.

Control of Biofilm Formation: Antibiotics and Beyond

Applied and Environmental Microbiology, 2016

Biofilm-associated bacteria are less sensitive to antibiotics than free-living (planktonic) cells. Furthermore, with variations in the concentration of antibiotics throughout a biofilm, microbial cells are often exposed to levels below inhibitory concentrations and may develop resistance. This, as well as the irresponsible use of antibiotics, leads to the selection of pathogens that are difficult to eradicate. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention use the terms “antibiotic” and “antimicrobial agent” interchangeably. However, a clear distinction between these two terms is required for the purpose of this assessment. Therefore, we define “antibiotics” as pharmaceutically formulated and medically administered substances and “antimicrobials” as a broad category of substances which are not regulated as drugs. This comprehensive minireview evaluates the effect of natural antimicrobials on pathogens in biofilms when used instead of, or in combination with, commonly prescribed anti...

Biofilm inhibition: the use of a marine alkaloid derivative in the prevention of clinically-relevant biofilms

Journal of Microbiology & Experimentation, 2018

Biofilms are complex and highly resistant microbial communities of sessile cells, which are responsible for many human pathogeneses. Given the risk that biofilms present to public health, this study was performed to contribute to the body of knowledge in the area of infections control by investigating the ability of Agilyte™, a marine alkaloid derivative, to inhibit biofilms of clinical significance and a potential synergistic effect of Agilyte™ and Penicillin G. The bacteria methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA), Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus epidermidis, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa were used in an in-vitro study. Biofilms were established using microtiter plates incubating at 35°C for 24hours, under static and aerobic conditions. To evaluate biofilm inhibition properties and a combined synergistic effect, Agilyte™, with and without antibiotic, was added to bacterial cultures prior to incubation. Biofilm mass was determined using a crystal violet reporter assay and viable cells were determined using the drop-plate method. Independent samples t-test was used to compare biofilm mass from treated samples and positive controls. Statistical significance was set at P<0.05. Mean Log10 Reduction (LR) was calculated for viable plate counts and significant difference was set at >0.3 LR. The data collected provide evidence that Agilyte TM , at given concentrations and under specific biochemical environments, inhibit biofilms of both gram-positive and gramnegative bacteria. The data suggest that Agilyte™ may inhibit the AI-2 cell signaling mechanism in bacteria. This study did not provide conclusive evidence of a possible synergistic anti-biofouling/antimicrobial effect of Agilyte™ and Penicillin G. However, given that the study yielded some questionable and variable results, data generated using polystyrene microtiter plates should be evaluated with caution and further studies are required to fully evaluate and validate the spectrum of anti-biofouling properties of this chemical compound. The biochemical environment where clinical bacterial biofilms form is an important factor when designing biofilm assays. Therefore, future in-vitrostudies should include accurate and representative models of relevant tissue and medical device surfaces where these microbial communities develop.

40.05.16 Researc J Pharm. and Tech April 2016.pdf

Rhamnolipids, naturally existent biosurfactantsassembledbyrhamnose sugar molecules and βhydroxyalkanoicacids that has wide range of promising profitable applications. In the study Pseudomonas aeruginosabacterial isolates was identified and screened for rhamnolipid production. P. aeruginosa achieved the production of rhamnolipid at room temperature in static cultures of a mineral salts medium containing olive oil. The pure culture was enhanced and optimized at pH-7, temperature-37 o C and olive oil as effective carbon source. The cultural media was optimized using response surface methodology -Box-Behnken with 30 ml of olive oil, 5 g/l NaNO 3 , 4 g/l KH 2 PO 4 and 7.5 g/l FeSO 4 mixture contributes maximum production of rhamnolipid. The R 2 value was 99.8 that correlated with adjusted R 2 value of 99.7 and predicted R 2 value of 99.5 shows the model is significant.

Bacterial-Biofilm-Dispersal-and-Inhibition-Strategies.pdf

Bacterial biofilms are communities of microorganisms residing within a polysaccharide matrix. Dental plaque, slimy coating in tanks, and algal mats on bodies of water are examples of biofilms. It is well accepted that biofilms play important role in bacterial persistence and antibiotic resistance in chronic infections. It is acknowledged that the majority of microbial cells on earth are living in distinct communities as biofilms. In fact, it is now known that 99% of all bacteria exist in biofilms, with only 1% living in the planktonic state. It has been estimated that 65% of microbial infections are associated with biofilms which constitute a microbial multicellular lifestyle and are defined as organized communities of bacteria. The structural nature of biofilms can protect the cells against antimicrobial agents and the host's defense. The microbial community inside a biofilm can also be protected against adverse conditions such as desiccation, osmotic shock, UV radiation, or exposure to toxic compounds, or predators. Due to the heterogeneous nature of biofilms, it is likely that multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance can occur.

Editorial: Novel approaches in the prevention of bacterial biofilm formation

Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology

Editorial on the Research Topic Novel approaches in the prevention of bacterial biofilm formation This editorial provides an outline of the papers published in the Frontiers Research Topic "Novel approaches in the prevention of bacterial biofilm formation" in the journal Frontiers in Cellular and Infection Microbiology. Biofilms are cultures of bacteria that have organized themselves inside a polymer matrix made up generally of polysaccharides, proteins, and extracellular DNA that the bacteria manufacture entirely or partially (Vestby et al., 2020).Nature has endowed bacteria with the capacity to build biofilms, which severely threaten humankind. Bacterial biofilms are impervious to the body's innate and adaptive inflammatory defense mechanisms, including antibiotics and disinfection chemicals, as well as phagocytosis. Preventing the development of bacterial biofilms is a promising strategy for lowering the prevalence of pathogenic microorganisms, and emerging techniques for accomplishing this goal require immediate attention (Hall-Stoodley et al., 2004).Through both fundamental and practical research, the Research Topic offers a view on the novel approaches in the prevention of bacterial biofilm formation. In addition, the articles examine a multi-faceted approach to preventing bacterial biofilms using a new chemical substance and exploring new formulation technologies (Iolanda and Gianfranco, 2010; Chen et al., 2013).The goal is to create a commercial solution for patients who require it. This editorial comprises seven publications that focus on the current research related to the prevention of the formation of bacterial biofilms along with a critical review of it. In a study titled "Silicone Foley catheters impregnated with microbial indole derivatives inhibit crystalline biofilm formation by Proteus mirabilis", Amer et al. sought the use of microbial indole extract in catheters can effectively decrease the formation of crystalline biofilm caused by P. mirabilis. Acting on virulence factors at sub-MIC levels without stressing bacterial growth lowers resistance development. This chemical is also safe for human cell lines. This indole extract reduces crystalline biofilm formation by inhibiting virulence factors that affect bacterial motility, adherence, and urease production. Long-term catheterization in animal models and synergistic action with additional anti-virulence drugs are planned to test this technique. The following publication, titled "Effects of TYPE

Identification of natural compounds which inhibit biofilm

Klebsiella pneumoniae, an important opportunistic pathogen, exists as a biofilm in persistent infections and in-dwelling medical devices. With the objective of identifying natural compounds inhibiting biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae, 35clinical isolates were screened,out of which 7 strong biofilm producers were identified. Six natural compounds were tested for their inhibitory effects on bacterial growth and biofilm formation by determining the minimum inhibitory concentration and minimum concentration for biofilm inhibition (MBIC) for each compound. The results show that reserpine followed by linoleic acid, were the most potent biofilm inhibitors. Reserpine, an efflux pump inhibitor was effective at biofilm inhibition at a concentration of 0.0156 mg/mL, 64-fold lower concentration than its MIC. Linoleic acid, an essential fatty acid was effective as a biofilm inhibitor at 0.0312 mg/mL, which is 32-fold lower than its MIC. Berberine, another plant derived antimicrobial, chitosan and eugenol had an MBIC value of 0.0635 mg/mL. Curcumin, a natural phenolic compound was effective at biofilm inhibition at a concentration of 0.25 mg/mL, which is 50 fold less than its MIC. Notably, the MIC and MBIC data on these 6 natural compounds was reproducible in all seven high biofilm forming isolates of K. pneumoniae. The present report is a comprehensive comparative analysis of the dose dependent inhibition of various natural compounds on biofilm formation in K. pneumoniae.

Beyond the Risk of Biofilms: An Up-and-Coming Battleground of Bacterial Life and Potential Antibiofilm Agents

Life

Microbial pathogens and their virulence factors like biofilms are one of the major factors which influence the disease process and its outcomes. Biofilms are a complex microbial network that is produced by bacteria on any devices and/or biotic surfaces to escape harsh environmental conditions and antimicrobial effects. Due to the natural protective nature of biofilms and the associated multidrug resistance issues, researchers evaluated several natural anti-biofilm agents, including bacteriophages and their derivatives, honey, plant extracts, and surfactants for better destruction of biofilm and planktonic cells. This review discusses some of these natural agents that are being put into practice to prevent biofilm formation. In addition, we highlight bacterial biofilm formation and the mechanism of resistance to antibiotics.