First- and second-order transformational apparent motion rely on common shape representations (original) (raw)
Related papers
The shape of motion perception: Global pooling of transformational apparent motion
Journal of Vision, 2013
Transformational apparent motion (TAM) is a visual phenomenon highlighting the utility of form information in motion processing. In TAM, smooth apparent motion is perceived when shapes in certain spatiotemporal arrangements change. It has been argued that TAM relies on a separate high-level form-motion system. Few studies have, however, systematically examined how TAM relates to conventional low-level motion-energy systems. To this end, we report a series of experiments showing that, like conventional motion stimuli, multiple TAM signals can combine into a global motion percept. We show that, contrary to previous claims, TAM does not require selective attention, and instead, multiple TAM signals can be simultaneously combined with coherence thresholds reflecting integration across the entire stimulus area. This system is relatively weak, less tolerant to noise, and easily overridden when motion energy cues are sufficiently strong. We conclude that TAM arises from high-level form-motion information that enters the motion system by, at least, the stage of global motion pooling.
Visual apparent movement: transformations of size and orientation
Perception, 1983
Sequential alternation between same-shaped stimuli differing in size (size ratio s) and orientation (angular difference v) produced a visual illusion of translation in depth and concurrent rotation. The minimum stimulus-onset asynchrony required for the appearance of a rigidly moving object was approximately a linearly increasing function of ( s− 1)/( s + 1) for simple translation in depth and a linearly increasing function of v for simple rotation. The extrapolated zero intercept was lower for translation than for rotation, but estimated transformation times were additive in combined transformations. The results suggest that (a) the processes of apparent translation in depth and apparent rotation are individually sequential-additive in structure, and (b) apparent translations and rotations are combined by fine-grained alternation of steps of apparent translation and steps of apparent rotation. Similar principles account for recent data on imagined spatial transformations of visual ...
Shape similarity and distance disparity as apparent motion correspondence cues
Vision research, 1988
Apparent motion is perceived when two spots of light are presented successively in different locations. When more than one element is present in each frame, there is a correspondence problem in matching the elements in one frame with those in the other. We report the effects of shape similarity and distance disparity on the correspondence process. Twenty subjects were tested using a 2-AFC design. We found that both shape and distance cues are used by the correspondence process: when distance is the only cue the motion which is usually perceived is that involving the shorter distance; when shape is the only cue the motion involving two elements of the same shape is preferred. We also studied the interaction between the two cues when both were present. Quantitative measures of the relative strengths of these effects and of their interaction are reported. A Signal Detection Theory model is used to analyze these apparent motion correspondence effects.
The duration of 3-D form analysis in transformational apparent motion
Perception & Psychophysics, 2002
Transformational apparent motion (TAM) occurs when a figure changes discretely from one configuration to another overlapping configuration. Rather than an abrupt shape change, the initial shape is perceived to transform smoothly into the final shape as if animated by a series of intermediate shapes. We find that TAM follows an analysis of form that takes 80-140 msec. Form analysis can function both at and away from equiluminance and can occur over contours defined by uniform regions as well as outlines. Moreover, the forms analyzed can be 3-D, resulting in motion paths that appear to smoothly project out from or into the stimulus plane. The perceived transformation is generally the one that involves the least change in the shape or location of the initial figure in a 3-D sense. We conclude that perception of TAM follows an analysis of 3-D form that takes ,100 msec. This stage of form analysis may be common to both TAM and second-order motion.
Interaction between complex motion patterns in the perception of shape
Vision Research, 2008
We investigated how different types of complex motion patterns interact in the perception of shape. We used global dot-motion stimuli which consisted of two superimposed groups of dots; one group of dots moved along an ellipsoidal trajectory (target pattern), while the other group of dots was divided into quadrants with dots in alternating sectors moving in radial expanding and radial contracting directions (background pattern). In the first experiment, observers judged whether the major axis of an ellipsoidal motion pattern oriented at 45°or À45°from vertical lay to the right or to the left of a central vertical line. Ellipsoids with different aspect ratios, which controlled both the tilt (left or right of vertical) and the extent of ellipsoidal curvature, were presented to observers using method of constant stimuli. The appearance of the ellipsoidal target pattern was distorted in the presence of background motion. The aspect ratio of the target at which observers perceived the figure to be circular was approximately 0.86 (an aspect ratio of 1.0 indicates a circle), with the pattern's major axis lying in the two sectors that contained contracting motion. This finding may constitute evidence that background motion distorts the perception of space, resulting in a distorted target pattern. However, the distortion effect is limited to conditions for which the speed of the target pattern and background pattern was slow and high contrast, and for when dots forming the target and background patterns were of the same luminance polarity.
Journal of Vision, 2008
This study uses a rapid-serial-visual-presentation (RSVP) paradigm to test the extent to which shape and motion direction can be independently accessed and processed during the perception of structure-from-motion (SFM) stimuli. Subjects reported the number of occurrences of shape or motion direction during RSVP sequences of 3D-SFM stimuli. Overall, performance was better for motion than shape. In the motion task, observers were less accurate when the motion direction was repeated revealing a repetition blindness (RB) effect. In addition, the repetition of shape, although irrelevant to the motion task, resulted in increased performance, without change in RB rate. In contrast, there was no RB at the group level in the shape task and the repetition of the irrelevant motion direction had no effect on the performance. A closer look at the data showed that observers fall in two statistically distinct groups for the shape task. Some observers (N = 6) show a repetition advantage (RA) while the others (N = 5) show a repetition blindness (RB) effect. No behavioral differences between groups could be found for the motion task. The implications of these results for models of SFM processing are discussed in the light of the type/token theory .
A common mechanism for the perception of first-order and second-order apparent motion
Vision Research, 2005
A common mechanism for perceiving first-order, luminance-defined, and second-order, texture-contrast defined apparent motion between two element locations is indicated by: (1) transitivity-whether or not motion is perceived is interchangeably affected by activationally equivalent luminance and contrast changes at each location, (2) local integration-whether or not motion is perceived depends on the net activation change resulting from simultaneous background-relative luminance and background-relative contrast changes at the same element location, and (3) inseparability-apparent motion is not perceived through independent first-or second-order mechanisms when luminance and contrast co-vary at the same location. These results, which are predicted by the response characteristics of directionally selective cells in areas V1, MT, and MST, are not instead attributable to changes in the location of the most salient element (third-order motion), attentive feature tracking, or artifactual first-order motion. Their inconsistency with Lu and SperlingÕs [Lu, Z., Sperling, G. (1995a). Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature 377, 237, Lu, Z., Sperling, G. (2001). Three-systems theory of human visual motion perception: review and update. Journal of the Optical Society of America A 18, 2331] model, which specifies independent first-and second-order mechanisms, may be due to computational requirements particular to the motion of discrete objects with distinct boundaries defined by spatial differences in luminance, texture contrast, or both.
Apparent motion distorts the shape of a stimulus briefly presented along the motion path
Journal of Vision, 2010
We examined whether motion blur accompanying apparent motion (AM) affects the shape of a stimulus presented in the motion path. In a two-alternative forced-choice procedure, observers judged the shape of a Gaussian test stimulus flashed in the path of motion, relative to a reference stimulus, which was a circular Gaussian stimulus located away from the path of motion. In Experiment 1, we report that the test stimulus was affected by AM and its perceived width was wider than its actual width, and counteracting this distortion, shape discrimination thresholds coincided with a test stimulus that was physically "thinner" than the reference stimulus. Shape distortion correlated with the strength of AM (Experiment 2) and increased within the range of inter-stimulus intervals used to induce AM and with retinal eccentricity but was eliminated when the test stimulus was made "hard-edged" (Experiment 3) or when the stimulus does not overlap with the motion path (Experiment 4). In Experiment 5, we demonstrate that the effect is present for dichoptic presentations. These results can be accounted for by a process in which the neural representation of AM generated by higher cortical areas feedback to interfere with the coding of stimulus shape by units located along the trajectory of AM.
Neural correlates of transformational apparent motion
Neuroimage, 2006
When a figure discretely and instantaneously changes its shape, observers typically do not perceive the abrupt transition between shapes that in fact occurs. Rather, a continuous shape change is perceived. Although this illusory ''transformational apparent motion'' (TAM) is a faulty construction of the visual system, it is not arbitrary. From the many possible shape changes that could have been inferred, usually just one is perceived because only one is consistent with the shape-based rules that the visual system uses to (1) segment figures from one another within a scene and (2) match figures to themselves across successive scenes. TAM requires an interaction between neuronal circuits that process form relationships with circuits that compute motion trajectories. In particular, this form -motion interaction must happen before TAM is perceived because the direction of perceived motion is dictated by form relationships among figures in successive images. The present fMRI study (n = 19) provides the first evidence that both form (LOC, posterior fusiform gyrus) and motion (hMT+) processing areas are more active when TAM is perceived than in a control stimulus where it is not. Retinotopic areas (n = 10), hMT+ (n = 7), and LOC (n = 7) were mapped in a subset of subjects. Results: There is greater BOLD response to TAM than to the control condition in V1 and all subsequent retinotopic areas, as well as in hMT+ and the LOC, suggesting that areas that process form interact with hMT+ to construct the perception of moving figures. D