Modernism and the antimodern in the “Men of 1914” (original) (raw)
Related papers
Chapter Four Modernist and Postmodernist Fiction ( s )
2015
The large body of critical work centred on modernism and postmodernism, which has seen the light of day in the twentieth century and the first years of the twentieth first, is simply impressive. What partly accounts for such extensive and ever proliferating critical responses to the two (cultural and aesthetic) movements may be connected, on one level at least, to the lack of consensus and the intense debate carried out among commentators with regard to their meaning and politics. As terms, modernism and postmodernism have infiltrated the professional idioms of a variety of disciplinary fields, from literature, art and philosophy to architecture, film and cultural analysis. They are, however, often interpreted multiply in their various contexts, decoded as they are in ways that address very specific, field-bound issues and problems. What is more, their definitional limits are further stretched by the ongoing revision to which they have been subjected since at least the 1970s, as new...
Yearbook of Comparative and General Literature 48 (2000): 281-85
Boox RBwnws 281 disingenuous and defensive. Though he describes Foucault's work as brilliant at one point (170, n. 89), he merely mentions it in passing; Baudrillard's work is dismissed in a note simply as "caricature" (155 n. 38); Said's critique of the appropriative effect of nineteenth-century Egyptology is described as "daft" (I41 n. 10); and Adorno is invoked simply a "colour of the month" (23). Had Sparshott engaged this critical tradition more seriously, his analysis of empire as an information system might have been situated more clearly in contemporary debates on that topic, and, more importantly, the potential force of his connections among aesthetics, axiology, and social practice may have emerged more clearly for a wider range of readers.
Autonomous and heteronomous in modernist form: from Romantic Image to the New Modernist Studies
Critical Quarterly, 2012
Modernism has been looking at itself quite hard recently. The rapid success of the Modernist Studies Association and its related journal Modernism/Modernity have prompted a number of state-of-the-discipline surveys from leading modernist scholars, and while they all acknowledge the impossibility of doing justice to the variety, there is considerable agreement about what the 'New Modernist Studies' means. Everyone notes that modernism is a much broader field than it was, some believing we should talk about modernisms plural, others interested in the way that this breadth allows a transnational sense of identity to writers unduly restricted by their own countries. 1 It seems clear, too, that sociological, historical and political frameworks have eclipsed accounts based on literary or aesthetic genealogy. Looking back at her college textbook of 1965, Pamela Caughie found introductions to Symbolism, Imagination, the Unconscious and Myth, with references to Kant, Rousseau, Coleridge, Flaubert, Pater, Marx and Engels. Nowadays, her students are reading Rita Felski's The Gender of Modernity, Paul Gilroy's The Black Atlantic and Tim Armstrong's Modernism, Technology and the Body. 2 And with such frameworks, the New Modernist Studies has redefined art's whole relation to context. The significance of the slash in the title of Modernism/ Modernity is not just that Modernity gets equal billing with the star works of art, but its suggestion of an 'and/or'. Modernism might be an alternative to Modernity, or it might equally be interchangable with it, and even if they differ, they can be compared within the same perspective. New Modernist criticism is as comfortable tracing a modernist culture in gramophones and women's underwear as in poems. Alex Goody's Modernist Articulations-which detects the correspondence between end of the corset and the move to free verse-addresses this new fusion of modernist art and cultural studies by citing Deleuze and Guattari: There is no longer a tripartation between a field of reality, the world, a field of representation, the book, and a field of subjectivity, the author. .. But an PETER HOWARTH arrangement places in connection certain multiplicities taken from each of these orders. 3 Thinking of 'modernism' as an entire cultural field also tends to move interpretation away from individual works to their conditions of possibility: Though analysis of the lives and work of such 'canonical' artists as Ezra Pound, T. S. Eliot and James Joyce continues to be a part of modernist studies, attention has shifted to the cultural circumstances in which they wrote, or to an interrogation of the premises by which they and other white male writers have been designated central in a landscape populated by artists and thinkers heretofore excluded from critical consideration by matters of race, ethnicity, gender, economic circumstances, geographic location, and ideology. 4
In 1919 the painter-novelist Wyndham Lewis reflected on a major stylistic sea change. ‘The Victorian age’ he wrote, ‘produced a morass of sugary comfort and amiableness, indulged men so much that they became guys of sentiment – or sentimental guys. Against this “sentimentality” people of course reacted. So the brutal tap was turned on. For fifty years it will be the thing to be brutal, “unemotional.” The aim of this special issue is to investigate that ‘brutal’, “unemotional” turn in literary production from 1900 onwards and to place it in the context of a larger rebellion against Enlightenment humanist ideals. Through essays on writers as diverse as Djuna Barnes and Michel Houellebecq, the contributors will consider the roots and results of anti-humanist thought in the experimental literature of the twentieth century. How did repulsion at Enlightenment certitudes affect literary and artistic innovation in the early twentieth century? What political implications did this have? How w...
“The Interaction between Intimacy and Elsewhere in the Aesthetic Experience”, 2023
This paper will investigate the afterlives of modernism in contemporary poetry, specifically Hannah Sullivan's collection Three Poems (2018) and Ariana Reines's A Sand Book (2019). Both poets directly respond to modernist predecessors, Sullivan to T. S. Eliot and Reines to Paul Celan, as well as adapt modernism's thematic concerns and innovative forms for a contemporary audience. Sullivan's poetic techniques are grounded in her work as a scholar of modernist literature and in her academic text The Work of Revision; Three Poems thus 'revises' The Waste Land's preoccupation with the spiritual decline and decay of an urban landscape for a contemporary audience. By responding to Celan's thematic concerns of time, survivorship, and bearing witness to the Holocaust, Reines confronts her own ancestral legacy of genocide while chronicling the ongoing onslaught of international tragedies viewed through the lens of social media and the 24-hour news cycle. Both poets cast themselves as transhistorical witnesses to Eliot and Celan, enabling them to reinvent modernism's forms and thematic preoccupations for a contemporary audience while placing themselves in dialogue with their poetic predecessors. Biography: Lisa Hester is a PhD research candidate in the Department of Fine Art and Education at the Technological University Shannon (TUS). She is a member of the Art and Psyche Research Group and focuses on the interconnections between analytical psychology and art criticism in her research. With a background in painting from the Limerick School of Art and Design, Lisa has published several articles on the role of analytical psychology in