A weapon to cut the “plug”. The visual discourse on the Law of Incompatibilities during the Second Spanish Republic (1931-1933) (original) (raw)

To Pull the “Plug” on Corruption. The Debate on Parliamentary Remuneration and Incompatibilities during the Second Spanish Republic (1931-1936)

European Social Science History Conference, 2023

The Second Spanish Republic (1931-1939) came about as a democratic regime that recognised the need for the remuneration of the deputies. This principle honoured the will to guarantee the political rights of all citizens and to avoid the monopolisation of parliamentary representation by large fortunes. However, the Republic was also conceived as a moralising project of Spanish politics after the monarchy of Alfonso XIII, branded as corrupt, fraudulent, and oligarchic. Thus, the parliamentary remuneration process was punctuated by debates and controversies over the abuse in the reception of per diem and the accumulation of public offices through influence peddling, the latter also known as “pluggism” (enchufismo). To put an end to these practices, which were denounced as the immoral prelude to widespread corruption and as contrary to the principles of honesty and austerity, the governments of the first republican biennium (made up of leftist and centre-leftist republicans and socialists) prepared a Law of Incompatibilities that was approved in 1933 and remained in force until the outbreak of Spanish Civil War. Taking all this into account, the aims of this paper are diverse. Firstly, the genesis of the debate on the parliamentary remuneration and the incompatibility of public offices will be inquired to understand the precedents of the republican debate. This will be complemented with a tracing of the genesis, evolution, and changes of the political concept “plug” (enchufe) and its derivatives, voices that even to this day are part of the Spanish political culture to refer to the achievement of public offices through favouritism. Secondly, through newspapers sources, but also political literature and cartoons, the paper will go into how parliamentary remuneration and accumulation of public offices became scandalous between 1931 and 1933. The consideration of this issue by different political cultures will allow us to observe how the denunciation of immorally perceived money and public offices became a demand for virtue and a new political morality by exalted republicans. But it also became a “throwing weapon” used by antirepublican and antiparliamentary forces, both from far-right and far-left, to try to undermine the legitimacy of the republican regime and its government. In this sense, the case of Manuel Cordero Pérez, a socialist politician nicknamed “the great pluggist”, will be paradigmatic to study the discourses on public morality of the different Spanish political cultures. Lastly, the paper will focus on the parliamentary debate on remuneration of the deputies and incompatibilities that took place in the Republican Courts to observe the institutional response to the scandalous situation. The analysis of the consequent rules and laws, mainly the Law of Incompatibilities and the minutes of the Parliamentary Commission on Incompatibilities, will serve this purpose too. In conclusion, through political history and cultural history, with a small foray into the history of concepts, this paper aims to weigh the role of the denunciations against corruption and the demands for vigilance towards the professional politicians as tools of politicisation and promoters of political (mis)trust in modern Spain.

Power and satire in the front-page images of Mariano Rajoy: visual motifs as political humour

EJHR - European Journal of Humour Research Vol. 9 No. 3, 2021

This article explores the use of photography and visual motifs as forms of political humour in contemporary media. By studying the representation of former Prime Minister of Spain Mariano Rajoy in the front pages of three Spanish newspapers (El Mundo, El País and La Vanguardia) between 2011 and 2017, the paper identifies and questions the liaisons between power and satire present in the so-called "serious" press, focusing on how different photographic traits concerning layout, composition and gestures reflect ideological choices. This photographic satire developed by printed media is then framed within a figurative tradition that goes back to Spanish royal portraiture, from Velázquez to Goya, which employs common strategies for the visual depiction of power, including satirical and humorous attributes to push specific political agendas. This examination, based on the quantified study and the visual analysis of more than 7,500 front pages, is part of the national research project MOVEP Visual Motifs in the Public Sphere: Production and Circulation of Images of Power in Spain, 2011-2017. In order to determine a useful procedural approach to satirical expressions in photographs, defining which front pages invoke a remarkable satirical content, this article also presents a comparative study and a categorisation based on formal (im)balances related to the concepts of visual motif and humour.

The promotion of democracy in political cartoons. The themes of cartoons in the Basque newspaper "Egin" (1977)

Revista Latina de Comunicación Social, 2016

Introduction. This article aims to identify the different themes explored in the comic strips published by the Basque newspaper Egin (1977/98) during its first year of operations. This nationalist newspaper had a great impact on the Basque society during the Spanish transition to democracy because it was the first left-wing publication in the Basque Country and because it devoted a whole page to graphic humour. Method. The study is based on the thematic analysis of the comic strips published in the entertainment section of the aforementioned newspaper throughout 1977. Quantitative techniques were used to identify and measure the frequency of occurrence of the diversity of issues and themes. Results and conclusions. The results show the clear preference of cartoonists for issues related to the promotion of democracy, as well as the existence of an opposition within the premises of traditional Basque nationalism against the new form of nationalism promoted by leftist movements.

“Sergio Aragonés Marginalizes Francoism in España Libre (NYC)” Camino Real. Alcalá de Henares: Instituto Franklin- UAH, 7:10 (2015): 129-146.

Camino Real, 2015

Sergio Aragonés is an award-winning and celebrated Mad Magazine cartoonist whose prolific career includes his bestselling comics Groo the Wanderer and Boogeyman, among others. However, his anti-Francoist cartoons published in the exile newspaper España Libre (1939-1977, NYC) have not previously been studied. Using an interdisciplinary theoretical approach to humor, I examine the social function of selected cartoons by Aragonés. The drawings, published from 1962 to 1965, expose the political persecution exerted by Francisco Franco to a global readership. His editorial cartoons also informed and emotionally sustained the dissenting working-class resistance under the regime and abroad.

Seriously Funny: Towards an Interpretative Framework for an Analysis of Catalan Satirical Cartoons in the Twentieth Century

2013

This thesis considers the Catalan satirical cartooning tradition in the period 1898 to 1977. It breaks from current approaches in Catalan cultural studies and Humour Theory in several significant ways. First, across four chronologically divided chapters – beginning with the post-colonial period through to Franco’s dictatorship – the study considers how Catalan satire was shaped by a shifting socio-political context and to what extent it, in turn, played a role in shaping that context. Here, it engages with humour’s role in identity construction through in-group solidarity. Second, supporting its inclusive position that a continued tradition can be observed throughout the twentieth century, the thesis looks beyond the common cut-off point of the Spanish Civil War by engaging with Catalan satirical cartoons in exile, in the clandestine press and in children’s comics during the Franco period. Third, it tests a multimodal framework that combines three major theories of humour: superiority, incongruity and release-relief, with Gestalt Visual Organisational Principles and socio-political context to produce a three-dimensional analysis of cartoon case studies. These cases have been selected from the most representative publications and cartoonists of the period and include the work of Tísner, Escobar and Cesc. The framework incorporates an expansion of superiority humour theory by raising the profile of the inferiority factor. More importantly, it marks a move towards addressing a verbal-centric imbalance in existing approaches to humour. Introducing the previously undervalued Catalan tradition to humour discourse, while at the same time injecting a much-needed academic approach to Catalan cartoon humour, the thesis also highlights the important potential of cartoons as a resource in Catalan Studies and in cultural analysis in general.

The Body is the Message: Democracy and Authoritarianism in Belmonte's Cartoons (1938-1942)

Confluenze (Bologna), 2022

How to escape censorship when graphic art is under surveillance by an authoritarian government? Which subterfuges can artists use to enforce their message, so to make themselves understood by their audience? These are the two questions inspiring the following paper, which analyzes the production of Belmonte, a famous caricaturist from São Paulo who gained prominence between the 1920s and 1940s. Guided by a Cultural History of the Political and by the documentary method for analysis of images, the article demonstrates how the Brazilian artist experienced and managed to overcome censorship during Getúlio Vargas' Estado Novo. In particular, one of his main strategies, i.e., the performativity of the caricatured characters, is scrutinized.