Archaeological Collaboration with American Indians: Case Studies from the Western United States (original) (raw)
Related papers
Glasgow Archaeological Journal, 1996
Archaeologies, 2018
Collaborative archaeological research with indigenous communities, in addition to fostering culturally specific, community-centred research programmes, also encourages meaningful shifts in archaeological research on the ground. Field Methods in Indigenous Archaeology (FMIA), a community-based research partnership between the University of Washington and the Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde, highlights these dual possibilities. The project seeks to strengthen the tribe’s capacity to care for cultural resources, to recover histories of survivance on the Grand Ronde Reservation, and to develop a low-impact, Grand Ronde archaeological methodology. These goals are realized through a summer field school, which joins comprehensive field instruction with overviews of tribal historic preservation and engagement with the Grand Ronde community. FMIA encapsulates the ethical imperative to work with, for, and by indigenous communities in archaeological research and the opportunities such work brings in transforming archaeological method,theory, and practice.
Tribal-Archaeological Cooperative Agreement A Holistic Cultural Resource Management Approach
Journal of Wetland Archaeology, 2002
The conflict, almost a panic for some archaeologists, over who "owns" the past--scientists or tribes--does not need to exist. Both groups have equal validity (legal or otherwise) in being involved. With shared scientific technical and tribal cultural expertise, an equal partnership produces results not possible otherwise. Here is one example of a formalized 50/50 sharing of the research that expands scientific and cultural understanding n the Pacific Northwest of North America. In this case, the Squaxin Island Tribe and a College signed a formal cooperative agreement that helped set the stage for developing (1) a tribal cultural resource management office, (2) the first full-scale investigation of a site in this region (which contains a wet component, (3) outreach cultural resource Management training through online classes, and (4) public interpretation in a new tribal museum. Working together, equally respecting each other's needs, archaeologists and tribes can create the scientific/cultural results they both require.
Seeking our Past, An Introduction to North American Archaeology, by Sarah W Neusius and T. Timothy Gross, 2007
The conflict, almost a panic for some archaeologists, over who "owns" the past--scientists or tribes--does not need to exist. Both groups have equal validity (legal or otherwise) in being involved. With shared scientific technical and tribal cultural expertise, an equal partnership produces results not possible otherwise. Here is one example of a formalized 50/50 sharing of the research that expands scientific and cultural understanding n the Pacific Northwest of North America. In this case, the Squaxin Island Tribe and a College signed a formal cooperative agreement that helped set the stage for developing (1) a tribal cultural resource management office, (2) the first full-scale investigation of a site in this region (which contains a wet component, (3) outreach cultural resource Management training through online classes, and (4) public interpretation in a new tribal museum. Working together, equally respecting each other's needs, archaeologists and tribes can create the scientific/cultural results they both require.
Better Together: Collaborative Archaeology at the Stewart Indian School
This thesis presents the initial results of the 2013 Collaborative Historical Archaeology Field School at the Stewart Indian School site, 26-OR-568, in Carson City, Nevada. The excavations were conducted largely in order to locate the original, wooden school building that was built in 1890, and to also locate the foundation of a pool that was filled in. The project was conducted in collaboration with the Nevada Indian Commission, the State Historic Preservation Office, and the Washoe-Tribal Historic Preservation Office. The focus of this thesis is on the collaborative methods utilized before, during, and after the field school, with the intention of demonstrating how collaboration in archaeology can renew relationships with Indigenous communities, provide multivocal interpretations of archaeological sites, and produce long-lasting benefits for descendant communities.
The White Mountain Apache Tribe Heritage Program: Origins, Operations, and Challenges
Working Together: Native Americans and Archaeologists, 2000
This essay describes how the White Mountain Apache Tribe of the eastern Arizona uplands has established an ambitious program to tackle the often unwieldy and emotionally charged issues involving archaeology, repatriation, museum development, historic preservation, community representation, and cultural perpetuation-all wrapped up in the context of tribal interpretation of Fort Apache, an outpost the United States once dedicated to White Mountain Apache subjugation and acculturation. I will describe the tribe's conceptual approach and concrete program initiatives 1999 and discuss how these relate to policy and ethical issues being confronted by archaeologists.