Quality of life in colon cancer patients with skin side effects: preliminary results from a monocentric cross sectional study (original) (raw)

Quality of Life in Patients With Severe Skin Reactions in Course of First-Generation Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitors Monoclonal Antibodies (Our Experience With Cetuximab)

2021

Background Metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) with wild type expression of RAS and RAF genes can be treated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies, such as cetuximab, in combination with chemotherapy. Skin toxicity represents the most serious and frequent side effect in these patients. Skin manifestations occur in approximately 80% of patients. In this study, we investigated the consequences on body image and quality of life (QoL) of patients with severe skin toxicity. Methods One hundred patients were enrolled with mCRC. All patients signed informed consent and completed questionnaires to assess QoL and body discomfort. Toxicity was assessed on Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAEs). Results The greatest impact on QoL was represented by difficulties in managing skin rash-related side effects. Data showed a significant impact in psychological sphere and social relationships. Conclusions Skin side effects, particularly rash, influenc...

Skin toxicity evaluation in patients treated with cetuximab for metastatic colorectal cancer: a new tool for more accurate comprehension of quality of life impacts

OncoTargets and Therapy

The effectiveness of evaluation of the severity of epidermal growth-factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-associated dermatological toxicities remains a topic of debate. This study was designed to assess the correlation between quality of life (QoL) and severity of dermatological toxicity, evaluated using the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) and our novel scale, the Eruption Scoring System (ESS), in metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC) patients treated with first-line chemotherapy combined with cetuximab. Methods: Cutaneous toxicity was evaluated, by oncologists and dermatologists, in patients (n=30) with histologically confirmed metastatic CRC who were scheduled to begin first-line chemotherapy combined with the EGFRI, cetuximab, using the NCI-CTCAE and ESS tools. Health-related QoL (HRQoL) was evaluated using the Skindex-29 and Skindex-17 dermatologyspecific instruments. Correlations between QoL and skin toxicity severity were assessed using Spearman's rank tests. Interclass correlation coefficients were used to assess interoperator agreement for ESS and NCI-CTCAE v4.0 scoring. Results: A positive correlation was identified between dermatology HRQoL and the severity of dermatological toxicities assessed using the NCI-CTCAE v4.0 scale for cutaneous papulopustular acneiform rash; however, a stronger correlation was observed between HRQoL and toxicities evaluated using the ESS tool. Both NCI-CTCAE v4.0 and ESS tools demonstrated good interobserver agreement for grading of skin toxicity. Conclusion: There is a strong correlation between the scores generated by the ESS and NCI-CTCAE tools to grade cutaneous toxicity related to treatment with the anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody, cetuximab. ESS can be considered a valid instrument for identification and grading of the severity of skin toxicity induced by cetuximab, with some advantages over the standard NCI-CTCAE scoring system.

A prospective study to validate the functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT) for epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitor (EGFRI)-induced dermatologic toxicities FACT-EGFRI 18 questionnaire: SWOG S1013

Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes

Background: Papulopustular rash is a common class effect of epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors (EGFRI) that can affect patients' health-related quality of life and cause disruptions to treatment. SWOG S1013 (NCT01416688) is a multi-center study designed to validate the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy EGFRI 18 (FACT-EGFRI 18) using 7-items from the National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 4.0 to assess EGFRI-induced skin-related toxicities and their impact on functional status. Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of colorectal or lung cancer to receive EGFRI therapies for at least 6 weeks were enrolled. Patient self-assessments using the FACT-EGFRI 18 were completed prior to undergoing CTCAE assessment by trained clinicians at baseline, weekly × 6, and then monthly × 3. The psychometric properties of the FACT-EGFRI 14 (skin toxicity items only) and 18 (plus 2 nail and 2 hair items) were established based on criterion validity, known groups validity, internal consistency reliability, and responsiveness to change. Results: Of the 146 registered patients, 124 were evaluable. High Cronbach's alpha (> 0.70) for both FACT-EGFRI 14 and FACT-EGFRI 18 scores across assessment times were observed. Although agreement (i.e. criterion validity) between individual and summary scales of the FACT-EGFRI 18 for assessing skin toxicity was good, agreement with the clinician-reported CTCAE was only fair. The minimal important difference was determined to be 3 points. The results also demonstrated responsiveness to symptom change.

Skin toxicity and quality of life in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer during first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI treatment in a single-arm phase II study

BMC Cancer, 2012

Background: Integument-related toxicities are common during epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy. Panitumumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody targeting the EGFR that significantly improves progression-free survival when added to chemotherapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer who have wild-type (WT) KRAS tumours. Primary efficacy and tolerability results from a phase II single-arm study of first-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer have been reported. Here we report additional descriptive tolerability and quality of life data from this trial. Methods: Integument-related toxicities and quality of life were analysed; toxicities were graded using modified National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria. Kaplan-Meier estimates of time to and duration of first integument-related toxicity were prepared. Quality of life was measured using EuroQoL EQ-5D and EORTC QLQ-C30. Best overall response was analysed by skin toxicity grade and baseline quality of life. Change in quality of life was analysed by skin toxicity severity. Results: 154 patients were enrolled (WT KRAS n = 86; mutant KRAS n = 59); most (98%) experienced integument-related toxicities (most commonly rash [42%], dry skin [40%] and acne [36%]). Median time to first integument-related toxicity was 8 days; median duration was 334 days. Overall, proportionally more patients with grade 2+ skin toxicity responded (56%) compared with those with grade 0/1 (29%). Mean overall EQ-5D health state index scores (0.81 vs. 0.78), health rating scores (72.5 vs. 71.0) and QLQ-C30 global health status scores (65.8 vs. 66.7) were comparable at baseline vs. safety follow-up (8 weeks after completion), respectively and appeared unaffected by skin toxicity severity. Conclusions: First-line panitumumab plus FOLFIRI has acceptable tolerability and appears to have little impact on quality of life, despite the high incidence of integument-related toxicity.

Completeness in the reporting of dermatologic adverse drug reactions associated with monoclonal antibody epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in phase II and III colorectal cancer clinical trials

Clinical colorectal cancer, 2008

The epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors cetuximab and panitumumab have demonstrated activity against colorectal cancer (CRC), with decreased systemic toxicities compared with cytotoxic chemotherapy. However, most patients experience dermatologic adverse drug reactions (dADRs). Our study examines completeness of reporting of dADRs to cetuximab and panitumumab in clinical trials for CRC. The PubMed MEDLINE database was searched for "cetuximab and CRC" or "panitumumab and CRC." Searches were limited to phase II or phase III clinical trials. Each result was evaluated for type of dADRs, grades included, correlation with survival, and dose modification. Ten of the 13 cetuximab articles (76.9%) analyzed included data on dADRs. Eight of ten (80%) reported all grades of rash, effect on dose modification was reported in 20%, and patient discontinuation in 30%. Five (50%) reported a positive correlation between dADRs and survival or response. Three of 7 (42.9%) pani...

Completeness in the reporting of dermatologic adverse drug reactions associated with monoclonal antibody epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors in phase II and …

Clinical colorectal …, 2008

In the United States, colorectal cancer (CRC) represents the third leading cause of cancer-related death, behind lung and prostate cancer in men and behind lung and breast cancer in women. In 2008, it is projected that 148,810 new cases will be diagnosed and 49,960 deaths will occur. About 19% of patients will initially present with metastatic CRC (mCRC). 1 Treatments for patients with mCRC have been mainly palliative and aimed at increasing the duration and quality of the patient's remaining life. For many decades, 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) was the only chemotherapy option available to patients with advanced CRC. Subsequent introduction of irinotecan and oxaliplatin to traditional 5-FU regimens gave additional first-line therapy choices. 2 Over the past decade, the discovery that epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is overexpressed in 70%-80% of patients with CRC and that overexpression of EGFR has been associated with tumor aggressiveness and poor prognosis led to the development and use of EGFR inhibitors in CRC. 3,4 Because EGFR inhibitors specifically target critical pathways for cancer cell growth and survival, treatment with EGFR inhibitors is associated with decreased incidence of systemic side effects in com