Total sanitation, a community stake (original) (raw)
Related papers
Development in Practice, 2012
25 In January 2008, sanitation and hygiene improvement practitioners in South Asia got together in Rajendrapur, Bangladesh to discuss progress in improving sanitation and hygiene. This summary paper focuses on household sanitation. School sanitation has been purposely left out as an area deserving systematic review on its own. The paper gives an overview of what has been achieved in South Asia and what has not, or insufficiently, been addressed. It also identifies four suggested areas for regional cooperation. The overall aim is not only achieving the MDG target of halving the number of people without a sanitary toilet, but also to achieve universal use and basic hygiene, and well-sustained facilities and programmes. Fulfilling these aims requires Abstract large-scale, cost-effective approaches and validated outcomes. Considerable progress has been made in ten subject areas, although there is room for more: policy development, low-cost solutions, user choice, decentralisation, mapping poverty areas, funding of demand creation, motivating users, local production and supply, phasing out ineffective subsidies, and going beyond numbers to healthy practices. Ten other subject areas are still overlooked or under-developed: diversification between and within households, cost-effective promotion, targeting remaining subsidies with equity, upgrading toilets over time, environmental safety, scope for dry toilets, sanitation in urban slums, short-term versus long-term programmes, sustainability of
Community-led total sanitation in rural areas: an approach that works
Water and Sanitation Program (WSP)South Asia, …, 2007
The Water and Sanitation Program is an international partnership for improving water and sanitation sector policies, practices, and capacities to serve poor people Sanitation programs have, for some time now, incorporated the need to raise awareness and emphasize the benefits of toilet usage. This has been most effectively undertaken by empowered communities motivated to take collective action, with the local governments and other agencies performing a facilitating role.
Empowering the Urban Poor to Solve their Sanitation Problem
Water Practice & Technology, 2010
SANIMAS (Sanitasi oleh Masyarakat) or Sanitation by Community is a nation-wide sanitation program for urban poor settlements in Indonesia and has already been implemented since 2003. Population density in urban settlement range between 600 to more than 1000 people per square km, which provides no room for proper sanitation infrastructures. The decentralized, communal, community-managed and cluster wise approach to solve sanitation problems in such high density has many types of challenges: technical, environmental, social and financial. Therefore there is the need to have concerted efforts for a careful yet reliable, high quality standard design, good supervision, sustainable operation and maintenance, as well as for continual monitoring and improvements. In the past, water and sanitation facilities in urban poor settlements were built for quantity and appearance not for quality and performance. As a result most of the infrastructures collapse and disfunction only a couple of months...
Talking shit: is Community-Led Total Sanitation a radical and revolutionary approach to sanitation?
Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water, 2014
Community Led Total Sanitation (CLTS) is a new approach to sanitation that has been widely adopted by international and national development organizations and national governments and implemented in 56 countries in the global South. Using participatory methods, it forces primarily rural communities to recognize that their practice of open defecation causes sickness and disease in their area and ‘triggers’ them to take action, ensuring that every household builds at least a pit latrine so that the community becomes open defecation free (ODF). In contrast to past approaches, one of its main tenets is strictly no subsidies of finance or materials. In the absence of monitoring and evaluation systems, it is not clear whether its immediate achievements are sustainable. In addition to questioning its sustainability, it is essential to examine CLTS through the analytical lens of power dynamics and human rights. While there is a rich practitioner-focused literature, there are few critical studies of this nature. Drawing on literature from a range of disciplines, this article deliberates how CLTS can be understood in terms of the concepts of rights, agents, and community. It questions whether, in the case of conflicting rights, the communal right to sanitation may justify compromising an individual's right to dignity. It also asks how we balance the right to dignity against the socioeconomic right to sanitation. Finally it questions the community led nature of CLTS, and suggests that external agents retain a level of responsibility for responding to any human rights infringements.
2021
This entry has been realised in the framework of the H2020-MSCA-RISE-2018 project "LoGov - Local Government and the Changing Urban-Rural Interplay". LoGov aims to provide solutions for local governments that address the fundamental challenges resulting from urbanisation. To address this complex issue, 18 partners from 17 countries and six continents share their expertise and knowledge in the realms of public law, political science, and public administration. LoGov identifies, evaluates, compares, and shares innovative practices that cope with the impact of changing urban-rural relations in five major local government areas: (1) local responsibilities and public services, (2) local financial arrangements, (3) structure of local government, (4) intergovernmental relations of local governments, and (5) people's participation in local decision-making. The present entry addresses people's participation in local decision-making in India. The entry forms part of the LoGov...
IDS Practice Papers
For constructive and critical comments on full drafts I am grateful to John Gaventa, Naomi Hossain and Rosemary McGee of the Participation Team's Writers' Group at IDS, to Peter Feldman as External Reviewer, and to Petra Bongartz, Mark Ellery and Lyla Mehta. Their various comments and suggestions have led to many corrections and revisions. I thank Kamal Kar for his pioneering, enthusiasm and energy and what I have learnt from his work and our work together. I owe much to IDS colleagues engaged on the DFID-funded CLTS research project, 'Going to Scale? The Potential of Community-Led Total Sanitation'-Lyla Mehta, Petra Bongartz, Andrew Deak and Anu Joshi, and to Sammy Musyoki of Plan Kenya whose ideas and experience have informed and helped to reorient my perspectives. I especially thank those many colleagues, partners in research and action learning,
A participatory approach to sanitation: experience of Bangladeshi NGOs
Health Policy and Planning, 2000
This study assesses the role of participatory development programmes in improving sanitation in rural Bangladesh. Data for this study came from a health surveillance system of BRAC covering 70 villages in 10 regions of the country. In-depth interviews were conducted with one adult member of a total of 1556 randomly selected households that provided basic socioeconomic information on the households and their involvement with NGO-led development programmes in the community.