Human Rights in the State-orientated Area of General International Law: Universality? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Human Rights: Effectiveness of International and Regional Mechanisms
This chapter examines the study of human rights regimes in the field of International Relations (IR). In particular, it explores the links between theories of regimes (how are the origins, development and effects of regimes on politics explained?) on the one hand, and the evolving norms and practices of human rights embedded within the institutions of international and global society on the other. Despite the ubiquitous institutional presence of human rights in world politics, the subject of human rights regimes remains somewhat elusive. The first section therefore seeks to give a general overview of how the study of human rights regimes has developed at the interface between IR and international law with a view to outlining the subject of research; to survey the main approaches adopted; to give a sense of why regimes matter and to what extent they could be understood to be ‘effective’. In particular, the implications of the analytical shift from the inter-state dynamics of international society to its transnational dimensions for the study of human rights regimes are outlined. Building on this last point, the second section explores the ways in which the norms and practices of global human rights institutions have evolved since the Second World War and into the age of globalisation. The focus here is on the institutionalization of human rights globally through the United Nations system and the connections between the development over time of international human rights institutions on the one hand and their relative effectiveness in shaping human rights behaviour on the other. Against this global background, the third section examines the comparative development of regional human rights regimes. Particular emphasis is put on the role and influence of regionalism in shaping the development and impact of international human rights law and policy.
The Jurisprudence of Human Rights in a Global Context
The International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Invention
This paper is a study of the conceptual dimensions of human rights gleaned from the writings of scholars and jurists, judicial precedent, and domestic and international human rights instruments, particularly under the United Nations System. Human rights have become an international subject and have today attained the status of a jus cogens rule of international law. The need to determine and clarify the history and dynamics of this subject has given impetus and inspiration to this paper. Applying a theoretical and doctrinal methodology, the paper set out to appraise the different dimensions, and for that matter ramifications, to the concept of human rights and how they affect our everyday life. The paper found, among other things, that human rights law and its observance are much more entrenched at the international forum than in domestic jurisdictions. The paper concluded that human rights issues are no longer a matter of domestic affairs of any nation in the light of extant intern...
Introduction: Global Human Rights Law and the Boundaries of Statehood
This is the introduction to a Special Issue of the Indiana Journal of Global Legal Studies on 'Global Human Rights Law and the Boundaries of Statehood', with contributions by Upendra Baxi, Fleur Johns, Larry Cata-Backer, Claire Cutler, Sheldon Leader, David Bilchitz, Radu Mares, Hans Lindahl, Daniel Augenstein, and Neil Walker. One of the virtues of the more recent ‘business and human rights’ debate – most prominently the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights (UNGPs) endorsed by the Human Rights Council in June 2011 – is that it has documented in considerable detail the significant impacts of global business operations on human rights protection in the international order of states. In response, many ‘global’ approaches to human rights protection suggest – whether explicitly or implicitly – a radical departure from human rights law’s state-centred heritage. As human rights impacts escape the state’s public and territorial authority, new private and trans-national human rights regimes emerge that fly under the radar of the state legal order yet contribute to further undermining the hegemony of its (constitutional and international) human rights law. The principal aim of the essays collected in this Special Issue, by contrast, is to examine how human rights responses to violations committed in the course of global business operations transform the boundaries of statehood constitutive of the state-centered conception of international human rights law. A guiding concern in examining this transformation is to recover the public and political nature of human rights law under conditions of globalisation.
Global rights and regional jurisprudence
Law and Philosophy, 1993
This article asks whether a "law-as-integrity" approach to human rights adjudication provides a theoretical framework within which to make sense of authoritative regional interpretations of basic human rights for the global community. To focus analysis, I consider U.S. court interpretations of international human rights as an interpretive context. I argue that, with appropriate modification so as to include the world community as a "community of principle" for purposes of human rights adjudication, the law-as-integrity perspective permits disputes surrounding the legality of human rights to revolve around competing interpretive claims backed up by justifying legal theories, rather than as ideological battles external to a juridical philosophy of rights. I. HUMAN RIGHTS AND LAW-AS-INTEGRITY The last decade has witnessed an increased recognition by jurists that certain fundamental human rights institute a variety of international legal obligations-enforceable in some (though not all) cases with multimillion dollar court judgments for compensatory and punitive damages-that are in principle binding on both individuals I and governments? And recent scholarship in international ethics has made significant headway in establishing that, pursuant to norms put forth in numerous transnational guidelines, fundamental human rights constrain the otherwise seemingly "footloose" global activities of multinational corporations. 3 However, such developments have not been accompanied by any cogent philosophical grounding for the notion
Global Protection of Human Rights: Aspirations, Challenges and Reflections
US-China Law Review, 2015
This paper appraised the impact of the International Bill of Rights on the promotion and protection of human rights across the globe. The paper examined the concept of international human rights, its global exchange and attempts to institutionalize its principles for the protection of individuals as a matter of universal validity in contemporary times. The author observed that in spite of arguments to the contrary, international human rights standards as set out in the International Bill of Rights have assumed the status of international customary law. The paper discloses that whatever the aspirations of the drafters however, violations of human rights stills persist in virtually all nations of the world some six decades after the adoption of the international documents for the universal protection of human rights were initiated on the floor of the United Nations.
Social Forces, 2009
Using an event history framework we analyze the adoption rate of national human rights institutions. Neo-realist perspective predicts adoption rates to be positively influenced by favorable national profiles that lower the costs and make it more reasonable to establish these institutions. From a world polity perspective adoption rates will be positively influenced by a world saturated with human rights organizations and conferences, by increasing adoption densities, and by greater linkages to the world polity. We find support for both perspectives in the analysis of the human rights commission. Only the changing state of the world polity is consequential for the founding of the classical ombudsman office. We discuss the national incorporation of international human rights standards and its relevance to issues of state sovereignty and national citizenship. The rise and expansion of the international human rights regime is a recent focus of sociological theory and research. Much theorizing revolves around the question of what such a regime implies for state sovereignty and national citizenship, and has accordingly centered on issues of treaty ratification and membership in international rights organizations. For both theory and research the crucial question is to ascertain the degree of importance to attach to national factors and historical legacies on the one hand, and on the other, the extent to which the outcomes of interest are driven by transnational dynamics. The literature includes those who assert that there are some discernable national economic, political and cultural
Comparative Perspectives on Regional Human Rights Systems
This briefing is based on the principal conclusions of the third workshop of the Inter-American Human Rights Network, held at University of Ghent’s Human Rights Centre in January 2016. The workshop represented an innovative attempt at comparative analysis by scholars and practitioners of the challenges facing human rights systems across the globe. Workshop participants critically examined and compared a full range of international human rights bodies to assess the extent to which policies and procedures have helped to advance the realisation of human rights, and how best practices may be adapted across different systems. The debate focused principally on the operation of regional human rights systems in the Americas, Africa and Europe, but due consideration was also given to the mechanisms available before the United Nations. The main conclusions from the workshop and a series of recommendations for future research on comparative research on international human rights bodies are outlined in this briefing paper.