An Income-Contingent Financing Program for Ontario (original) (raw)
Related papers
2005
governmental organization dedicated to policy-based research on educational opportunity for all students. With offices in Washington, DC, and Toronto, ON, EPI is a collective association of researchers and policy analysts from around the world dedicated to the mission of enhancing our knowledge of critical barriers facing students and families throughout the educational pipeline. In addition, EPI has developed extensive partnerships and collaborative arrangements with other leading research and educational organizations, further supporting our mission and ability to conduct policy-relevant research for practical use. The mission of EPI is to expand educational opportunity for low-income and other historically-underrepresented students through high-level research and analysis. By providing educational leaders and policymakers with the information required to make prudent programmatic and policy decisions, we believe that the doors of opportunity can be further opened for all students...
Ontario Post-Secondary Education Funding Policies: Perverse Incentives and Unintended Consequences
2019
This paper offers some observations on the funding of post-secondary schools in Ontario and Canada more broadly. Specifically, it notes how limited public funding for domestic students has provided strong incentives for PSE schools to attract full fee-paying international students, whose numbers have risen dramatically in recent years in Canada. The result has been a rising financial exposure of such schools to sudden external funding shocks and an increasing risk to the overall quality and available curriculum of programs delivered to all students. The paper also comments on Ontario plans for differentiation of schools, and raises concerns about Ontario’s planned heavy reliance on performance-based funding rules. We explore unintended consequences of crude application of simplistic performance metrics using a number of examples from recent British and Australian experience.
Free to Learn A discussion paper on the School Fee Exemption policy
2005
The Means to Live discussion paper series This paper is one of a series that examine the targeting mechanisms of poverty alleviation programmes across different sectors. The papers form part of the Means to Live Project, based at the Children's Institute (CI), University of Cape Town (UCT). This project aims to evaluate the State's targeting mechanisms used to realise the socioeconomic rights of poor children and their families. The project is a collaborative project of the Child Rights and Child Poverty Programmes within the Institute, as well as a number of UCT and external collaborators.
Financing School Choice: How Program Design Impacts Issues Regarding Legality and Equity
Kansas Journal of Law and Public Policy, 2018
Since the first modern school choice laws were passed in the early 1990s, access to educational options has grown tremendously. Today, more than 6,900 charter schools exist in the 44 states and the District of Columbia which have charter school laws. These schools enroll more than 3.1 million children. During the same time period, prevalence of private school choice programs has grown dramatically with nearly 50 different programs in existence. Many have sought to examine the impacts of school choice programs on students. Indeed, there is a vigorous debate in the literature on this matter. This paper explores this issue from a different angle—school finance. The design of school choice programs, specifically how they are funded, has important implications for the legality of a program and with issues related to equity. These matters are incredibly important as states continually grapple with questions related to adequacy and equity in school finance. As school choice programs continue to expand, they offer an opportunity not just to expand educational options, as proponents suggest, but to improve how we fund education for all students. This paper explores the issues related to school finance and school choice litigation, then offers a school choice model that might be used to increase equity in finance and in educational options.
Community Attitudes to Income Contingent Loans
Australian Journal of Labour Economics ( …, 2009
A survey of community attitudes to income contingent loans was conducted in May 2008. The predominant focus of the survey was to ascertain the level of support, or otherwise, for the Higher Education Contribution Scheme (HECS) and for the hypothetical application of income contingent loans (ICL) to various other policy areas, including drought relief, child care, research and development, and elite athletes. Public debate over the potential application of income contingent loans to a number of these areas has increased recently.