Digital Futures II: Museum Collections, Documentation, and Shifting Knowledge Paradigms (original) (raw)

The Museum as Information Space: Metadata and Documentation

Although museums vary in nature and may have been founded for all sorts of reasons, central to all museum institutions are the collected objects. These objects are information carriers organized in a catalogue system. In this chapter, the museum will be conceived as an information space, consisting of an information system related to different methods of reasoning. We will highlight the new possibilities offered by digital technology and the changes brought by the way in which visitors come into contact with objects. Our central claim is that the visitor moved from being onsite within the museum's information space to being outside the museum in the online information space of the Internet. This has fundamental implications for the institutional role of museums, our understanding of metadata and the methods of documentation. The onsite museum institution will, eventually, not be able to function as an institutional entity on the Internet, for in this new information space, objects, collections and museums, all function as independent components in a vast universe of data, side by side at everyone's disposal at anytime. Potentially, users can access cultural heritage anytime, anywhere and anyhow.

Museum Object Lessons for the Digital Age by Haidy Geismar

The fundamental argument of this book is that we need to pay attention to the specific contexts, as well as materialities, of digital objects and that digital media in museums exist in a long-standing continuum or process of mediation, technological mimesis and objectification. In an exchange of comment in the journal Science, Franz Boas argued with his colleague O.T. Mason about the purpose and nature of museum collections. The debate emerged from the growing museological tension between the spectacular nature of individual objects and their contextualisation within academic and scientific knowledge systems. Boas, summarising his position later, noted: I think no word has ever been said that is less true than Dr. Brown Goode’s oft-repeated statement that a museum is a well-arranged col- lection of labels illustrated by specimens. On the contrary, the attrac- tion for the public is the striking specimen; and whatever additional information either the label or the surrounding specimens may be able to convey to the mind of the visitor is the only result that can be hoped for.

Organizing Knowledge in Museums: A Review of Concepts and Concerns

Knowledge Organization, 2017

This paper critically analyzes and ties together contemporary perspectives in information studies, science and technology studies, knowledge organization and indigenous postcolonial theory (particularly concerning ontologies and knowledge organization) and defines the development of a field of thought for museum knowledge organization. It also proposes a selection of terms or ideas for the field of knowledge organization in museums and begins to historicize the development of the field. This paper calls attention to the practical and intellectual issues raised when other knowledges “meet” museums systemsas well. The history of the study of museums within Foucauldian thought, the origins of contemporary ideas of the socio-technical, the utility of the metaphor of infrastructure, and the notion of technological affordance are all ideas that have been useful in understanding standardized systems in large institutional repositories, especially as museum collections continue to be digitized and circulated widely by communities. This paper plots the issues we as scholars and professionals should be attentive to when studying the organization of knowledge in museums by developing a theoretical standpoint that engages seriously with the ethics and politics of knowledge.

Digital Futures I: Museum Collections, Digital Technologies, and the Cultural Construction of Knowledge @BULLET @BULLET @BULLET @BULLET @BULLET DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AND NEW STYLES OF INFORMATION

Digital technologies and their uses within museum collections have until recently been explored primarily from a technical viewpoint. Increasingly, museum professionals are moving beyond technologically-driven reasoning to entertain new ways of conceptualizing both collections and information. This is leading to knowledge models beyond those already imagined. This paper considers the synergy between theoretical ideas in the academy and the computer ontologies that have been brought to bear on collections information. Drawing on user research findings from the Themescaping Virtual Collections project and the work of leading literary and media theorists, the paper examines how user needs and digital technologies are reformulating our understanding of museum collections and the relationships between museums and audiences. The knowledge connection—Media theorist Marshall McLuhan (1964, xi) challenged technologically deterministic arguments to account for the emergence of new technologies (notably print, and, more recently, television). McLuhan stated: " We become what we behold that we shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us. " Viewing the world in terms of embedded knowledge structures, he argued, enables the development of tools that emulate new social and theoretical ideas. New ways of perceiving encourage social transformation. These tools—and the technological innovations they reflect—offer possibilities beyond those originally imagined. In the current technological context, poststructuralism and postmodernism are the theoretical structures that enabled multimedia and the Internet to emerge as forms of information architecture. Multimedia, hypertext, hypermedia and the Internet might be described as the ultimate postmodern media set. The intellectual characteristics of post-325 Fiona Cameron (fiona.cameron@arts.usyd.edu.au) is a research fellow in history in the

Collections documentation practices: a critical perspective: International Conference EVA 2006 London Conference, “Electronic Information, the Visual Arts & Beyond”, 26/07 – 28/07/2006 in The Institute of Archaeology, UCL, London.

This paper/poster introduces the threefold dimension of collections documentation as activity, means and product. After an examination of current documentation practices through well-established documentation standards, we argue that in current practices, documentation functions as means for preservation and care of museum objects. However the function of documentation as a means that improves understanding, interpretation and engagement with collections is not supported, because of the current structure, the scope and purpose of documentation. Finally, a new approach that invites users' perspectives in documentation is proposed.

Digital Futures I: Museum Collections, Digital Technologies, and the Cultural Construction of Knowledge

Digital Futures I: Museum Collections, Digital Technologies, and the Cultural Construction of Knowledge, Curator , 46, 3, July 2003, 2003

Digital technologies and their uses within museum collections have until recently been explored primarily from a technical viewpoint. Increasingly, museum professionals are moving beyond technologically-driven reasoning to entertain new ways of conceptualizing both collections and information. This is leading to knowledge models beyond those already imagined. This paper considers the synergy between theoretical ideas in the academy and the computer ontologies that have been brought to bear on collections information. Drawing on user research findings from the Themescaping Virtual Collections project and the work of leading literary and media theorists, the paper examines how user needs and digital technologies are reformulating our understanding of museum collections and the relationships between museums and audiences. DIGITAL TECHNOLOGIES AND NEW STYLES OF INFORMATION The knowledge connection-Media theorist Marshall McLuhan (1964, xi) challenged technologically deterministic arguments to account for the emergence of new technologies (notably print, and, more recently, television). McLuhan stated: "We become what we behold that we shape our tools and thereafter our tools shape us." Viewing the world in terms of embedded knowledge structures, he argued, enables the development of tools that emulate new social and theoretical ideas. New ways of perceiving encourage social transformation. These tools-and the technological innovations they reflect-offer possibilities beyond those originally imagined. In the current technological context, poststructuralism and postmodernism are the theoretical structures that enabled multimedia and the Internet to emerge as forms of information architecture. Multimedia, hypertext, hypermedia and the Internet might be described as the ultimate postmodern media set. The intellectual characteristics of post-325 Fiona Cameron (fiona.cameron@arts.usyd.edu.au) is a research fellow in history in the

Striving to Persist: Museum Digital Exhibition and Digital Catalogue Production

2019

Although museum automation emerged in the mid-1960s, American and British art museums continue to have a difficult relationship with digital technology. Indeed, within the broader cultural heritage network, art museums have been particularly reluctant to disseminate their missions online. Particularly since the eighteenth century, art museums have remained beholden to certain perceptions of authority that are tied to the authentic object. Yet, as new technologies offer more efficient and cost-effective ways to store and disseminate information and promise greater accessibility, these museums have continued in their efforts to incorporate digital methods into their practices. The following document considers the role of information organization in the creation of knowledge and value within and beyond the space of the art museum by interrogating two major scholarly products of the well-endowed, early 21st century Western art museum’s ecosystem: online catalogues and online exhibitions...

Curating Data, Disseminating Knowledge: Museums of the Digital Age

This paper substantiates the premise that cultural heritage is a construct, and therefore engagement with theoretical issues are mandatory for understanding the ways in which heritage gets created, nurtured and preserved. It demonstrates that although digital media allow the nurture of repositories of culture heritage, they require curatorial directions for establishing notions, and illuminating the changing social lives of the phenomenon.

Beyond Documentation: An Analytical Approach towards the Future of Museums as Information Centres

2013

In view of the records preservation status in Zimbabwe’s National Museums, this study tries to ascertain the future of museums as information centres. Using the records life cycle principle and the continuum model which state that documents should be properly managed from the time they are created until their ultimate disposal, this study examined the preservation strategies employed by Zimbabwe’s National Museums to ensure their records survive into the future. For the museum’s purpose in life to be justified and meaningful, records that are generated as a result of the museum's programmes and activities must be regarded as corporate assets, whose preservation should be given due consideration. Using the survey research design, the study employed interviews; questionnaires, observations and the social media to collect data from the informants of the study. An overview of the significant findings of the study reflects that museum records management issues are not yet an ap...