The dialectics of collective and individual transformation: Transformative activist research in a collaborative Learning community project. By Vianna, E., Hougaard, N., & Stetsenko, A. (2014). In A. Blunden (ed.), Collaborative Projects (pp. 59-87). Leiden, the Netherlands: Brille Publishers. (original) (raw)

Abstract

In this chapter we describe the implementation of a transformative activist research project (PALC) designed and carried out in collaboration with students in a community college in the New York City metropolitan area. The inspiration for this project was the critical need to expand current educational approaches for community college students, many of whom struggle in college. Guided by ideals of democracy and social justice, our aim was to move beyond instrumentalist conceptions of higher education that seek to only prepare students to fit in with existing social structures by meeting the expected demands of the job market. Inspired by cultural-historical activity theory (CHAT, see Leontiev, 1978; Vygotsky, e.g., 1997, 1998a, b) expanded by the transformative activist stance (TAS, Stetsenko, e.g., 2008), we collaboratively implemented a project in which both students and faculty/researchers endeavored to move beyond the goals of adapting to the world to instead develop activist projects of social transformation in college and beyond. The specific goal was to work in solidarity in striving to break away from a narrow, commodified educational agenda focused on utilitarian learning outcomes geared toward future employability. Our method was based on co-constructing with students, based on critical-theoretical pedagogy (Vianna & Stetsenko, 2011), a collaborative space and tools for activist learning and development to expand active engagement in transforming alienating and oppressive educational practices in the college and in their community practices. Thus, this project consisted in bringing together students and researchers to collaboratively investigate and promote the development of their transformative activist stance, through the tools of learning, by expanding the contribution of each participant to a widening range of community practices, sociocultural practices and discourses.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (40)

  1. Arievitch, I.M., & Stetsenko, A. (2000). The quality of cultural tools and cognitive devel- opment: Gal'perin's perspective and its implications. Human Development, 43, 69-92.
  2. Association of American Colleges and Universities -AAC&U (2002). Greater Expectations: A New Vision for Learning as a Nation Goes to College. National Panel Report. Washington, D.C.: AAC&U. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://greater expectations.org. Association of American Colleges and Universities -AAC&U (2007). College Learning for the New Global Century. National Report. Washington, D.C.: AAC&U. Association of American Colleges and Universities -AAC&U (2008). Liberal Education and Global Citizenship: The Arts of Democracy. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://www.aacu.org/globalcitizenship/index.cfm.
  3. Association of American Colleges and Universities -AAC&U (2013). It Takes More Than a Major: Employer Priorities for College Learning and Student Success. Retrieved September 3, 2013, http://www.aacu.org/leap/public\_opinion\_research.cfm.
  4. Bass, R. (2012). Disrupting Ourselves: The problem of learning in higher education. Educause Review 47(2), 23-33. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://www Vianna, Hougaard and Stetsenko .educause.edu/ero/article/disrupting-ourselves-problem-learning-higher -education.
  5. Baxter Magolda, M.B. (1999). Constructing adult identities. Journal of College Student Development 40(6), 629-644.
  6. Beach, J.M. (2011). Gateway to Opportunity: A History of the Community College in the United States, Sterling, VA: Stylus Publishing.
  7. Engle, J. & Tinto, V. (2008). Moving Beyond Access: College Success for Low-Income, First- Generation Students. Washington, D.C.: Pell Institute for the Study of Opportunity in Higher Education
  8. Freire, P. (1970/1993). Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, NY: Continuum.
  9. Galperin, P. (1985). Metody obuchenija i umstvennoe razvitie rebenka [Methods of Instruction and Mental Development of the Child]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.
  10. Griffin, K.A. & Hurtado, S. (2011). Institutional variety in American higher education. In J.H. Schuh, S.R. Jones, S.R. Harper & Associates (Eds.), Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  11. Keeling, R. (Ed.). (2004). Learning Reconsidered: A Campus-Wide Focus on the Student Experience. Washington, DC: American College Personnel Association and National Association of School Personnel Administrators.
  12. Kegan, R. (1994). In Over Our Heads: The Mental Demands of Ordinary Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  13. King, P.M. & Baxter Magolda M.B. (2011). Student learning. In: P.M. King, M.B. Baxter Magolda, J.H. Schuh, S.R. Jones & S.R. Harper, (eds.) Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession, 207-225, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  14. Kuh, G. (2008). High Impact Educational Practices: What They Are, Who Has Access to Them, and Why They Matter. Washington, D.C.: AAC&U, 2008.
  15. Kuh, G. (2010). High-impact Practices: Retrospective and prospective. In J.E. Brownell & L.E. Swaner, Five High Impact Practices: Research on Learning Outcomes, Completion, and Quality. Washington, D.C.: AAC&U, 2010.
  16. Kuh, G., Kinzie, J., Schuh, J., & Whitt, E.J. (2005). Student Success in College: Creating Conditions That Matter. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  17. Leontiev. A.N. (1978). Activity, Consciousness and Personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall. National Center for Education Statistics (2001). Community College Transfer Rates to 4-year Institutions Using Alternative Definitions of Transfer. (NCES 2001-197). Washington, DC: E.M. Bradburn; D.G. Hurst & S. Peng. Retrieved from http://nces .ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2001197. National Center of Education Statistics (2006). Profile of Undergraduates in U.S. Postsecondary Education Institutions, 2003-04: With a Special Analysis of Community College Students (NCES 2006-184). Washington, DC: Horn, L., Nevill, S. & Griffith, J. Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED491908.pdf. Dialectics of Collective and Individual Transformation National Center for Education Statistics (2009). On Track to Complete? A Taxonomy of Beginning Community College Students and their Outcomes 3 Years After Enrolling: 2003-04 through 2006. (NCES 2009-152). Washington, DC: Horn, L. & Weko, T. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2009/2009152.pdf.
  18. Pascarella, E.T. & Terenzini, P.T. (2005). How College Affects Students, San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  19. Phillippe, K., and Sullivan, L.G. (2005). National Profile of Community Colleges: Trends & Statistics. Washington, D.C.: American Association of Community Colleges.
  20. Seidman, A. (2007). Minority Student Retention: The Best of The Journal Of College Student Retention: Research, Theory and Practice. New York, NY: Baywood Publishing Company.
  21. Schulman, L. (2000). The Carnegie Classification of Institutions of Higher Education. Retrieved August 31, 2013 from http://classifications.carnegiefoundation.org/ downloads/2000_edition_data_printable.pdf.
  22. Solorzano, D.G., Villalpando, O. & Oseguera, L. (2005). Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4 (3), 272-294.
  23. Stetsenko, A. (2007). Being-through-doing: Bakhtin and Vygotsky in dialogue. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 2, 25-37.
  24. Stetsenko, A. (2008). From relational ontology to transformative activist stance: Expanding Vygotsky's (CHAT) project. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 3, 465-485.
  25. Stetsenko, A. (2010a). Standing on the shoulders of giants: A balancing act of dialecti- cally theorizing conceptual understanding on the grounds of Vygotsky's project. In W.-M. Roth (Ed.), Re/structuring Science Education: ReUniting Psychological and Sociological Perspectives (pp. 53-72). New York, NY: Springer.
  26. Stetsenko, A. (2010b). Teaching-learning and development as activist projects of his- torical becoming: Expanding Vygotsky's approach to pedagogy. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 5, 6-16.
  27. Stetsenko, A. (2012). Personhood: An activist project of historical becoming through collaborative pursuits of social transformation. New Ideas in Psychology, 30, 144-153.
  28. Stetsenko, A. (2013a). Theorizing personhood for the world in transition and change: Reflections from a transformative activist stance. In J. Martin & M.H. Bickhard (Eds.), The Psychology of Personhood (pp. 181-202). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  29. Stetsenko, A. (2013b). The challenge of individuality in cultural-historical activity Theory: "Collectividual" dialectics from a transformative activist Stance. Outlines - Critical Practice Studies, Summer. Special Issue on "Transformative social practice and socio-critical Knowledge" (ed. by I. Langemeyer & S. Schmachtel).
  30. Vianna, Hougaard and Stetsenko
  31. Stetsenko, A. (in press). Transformative activist stance for education: Moving beyond adaptation to the status quo through critical activist scholarship. In T. Corcoran (Ed.), Psychology in Education: Critical Theory-Practice. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
  32. Thelin, J.R. & Gasman, M.R. (2011). Historical overview of American higher education. In Schuh, J.H., Jones, S.R., Harper, S.H., & Associates. (Eds.). Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession (5th ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
  33. US Chamber of Commerce Foundation (2013). Skills for America's Future. Retrieved August 31, 2013, from http://education.uschamber.com/initiative/plan-develop -skills-americas-future.
  34. Vianna, E. (2009). Collaborative Transformations in Foster Care: Teaching-learning as a Developmental Tool in a Residential Program. Saarbrücken: VDM Verlag Dr. Müller.
  35. Vianna, E., & Stetsenko, A. (2011). Connecting learning and identity development through a transformative activist stance: Application in adolescent development in a child welfare program. Human Development, 54, 313-338.
  36. E., & Stetsenko, A. (in press). Research with a transformative activist agenda: Creating the future through education for social change. In J. Vadeboncoeur (Ed.), National Society for the Study of Education.
  37. Vygotsky, L.S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R.W. Rieber (Ed.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 4 (pp. 1-278). New York: Plenum Press.
  38. Vygotsky, L.S. (1998a). Pedology of the adolescent. In R.W. Rieber (Ed.), The Collected Works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child Psychology (pp. 1-184). New York: Plenum Press.
  39. Vygotsky, L.S. (1998b). The problem of age (M. Hall, Trans., original work written 1933- 1934). In R.W. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky. Vol. 5. Child Psychology (pp. 187-205). New York: Plenum Press.
  40. Whitt, E.J. (2011). Academic and student affairs partnerships. In J.H. Schuh, S.R. Jones, S.R. Harper & Associates (Eds.), Student Services: A Handbook for the Profession. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.