THE NUREMBERG TRIAL (original) (raw)
Related papers
THE TWO MOST FAMOUS TRIALS: NUREMBERG AND TOKYO
NUREMBERG AND TOKYO, 2023
THE NUREMBERG TRIAL - The author analyses the trials held by the Allies against representatives of the defeated Nazi Germany, for plotting and carrying out invasions of other nations. The author resumes and analyzes the trial opened in Nuremberg on November 14, 1945, against the main political and military leaders of the Third Reich. The Tokyo Trial - The author analyses the trial of the twenty-eight senior Japanese officers before the International Military Tribunal for the Far East, known as the “Tokyo Trial,” which was the second attempt after Nuremberg at an international response to the crimes committed during World War II. The book highlights the procedural weaknesses and political negotiations in the work of the International Military Tribunal for the Far East.
European Journal of International Law, 2010
When the international criminal tribunals were convened in Nuremberg and Tokyo in the mid-1940s, the response from lawyers was mixed. Some believed that the Second World War was an exceptional event requiring special legal remedies, and commended the tribunals for advancing international law. Others condemned them for their legal shortcomings and maintained that some of the charges were retroactive and selectively applied. Since then, successive generations of commentators have interpreted the tribunals in their own ways, shaped by the conflicts and political concerns of their own times. The past two decades have seen the establishment of new international courts, and an accompanying revival of interest in their predecessors at Nuremberg and Tokyo. Recent commentaries have analysed the founding documents, the choice of defendants, the handling of the charges, the conduct of the casesand also the legal and political legacies of the tribunals. They demonstrate that long-standing disagreements over antecedents, aims and outcomes have still not been settled, and that the problems inherent in some of the original charges have still not been solved, despite the appearance of similar charges within the remit of the International Criminal Court today.
The Nuremberg Tribunal v. The Tokyo Tribunal: Designs, Staffs, and Operations
2010
This article is published by invitation in a special symposium issue of the John Marshall Law Review entitled “International Law in the 21st Century: The Law and Politics of the International Criminal Court.” The article compares the International Military Tribunal (also known as the Nuremberg Tribunal) with the International Military Tribunal for the Far East (also known as the Tokyo Tribunal), the two ad hoc international war crimes tribunals the Allies established after World War II to prosecute suspected atrocity perpetrators from Nazi Germany and Imperial Japan, respectively. The article examines these two tribunals’ similarities and differences, especially as they relate to the tribunals’ designs, staffs, and operations. The article concludes by suggesting that future research should consider whether and, if so, how similarities and differences between the Nuremberg and Tokyo tribunals affected their results, including their durations and judgments.