Bureaucracy in Iran: Helpful or Harmful (original) (raw)
Related papers
Bureaucracy: Its Benefits and Failures
BUREAUCRACY: Its Benefits and Failures. Bureaucracy exists in modern States. It is a vital part of the government and, because of its essential expanding function to respond to the needs of the people, bureaucracy has become, in some instances, a state within a state. Scholars agree that inefficiency of bureaucracy is revealed in time of crisis and high emergencies when a human catastrophe occurs and afflicts thousands or millions of innocent lives. Normally, bureaucracy is established to be efficient so as to be beneficial to society. Hence, inefficiency is the exception. However, after counting the human disaters around the world, one wonders if 'inefficiency' has not become the iron rule challenging the governing system and consequently threatening its existence. " Chernobyl " is one of these disasters of the world that made the discussion of this issue as one of the highest priorities of the governance of the people. In the first part of this essay, the description of Chernobyl Nuclear Plant disaster and analysis of the ex-Soviet Republic, at the time of the catastrophe, is necessary to introduce the problem. The second part considers the definition of Bureaucracy, static and dynamic. The third part strengthens, through some examples of human disasters, the dilemma of bureaucratic efficiency.
controversy of Bureaucracy article
Bureaucracy as a concept has created a lot of controversies and tension among politician, academician, author and even administrators alike, this paper attempts to critically evaluate and analyze the strength and weakness of bureaucracy. The research has identified two categories-the pessimist and optimist of bureaucracy. All has shown sufficient reason to back their claims which this paper seeks to explore.
Constitutionale
The purpose of this paper is that the author tries to explain the concept of bureaucracy and government. In addition, the author also describes the differences between bureaucracy and government in terms of definition, theory, and task. This paper also aims to discuss the position of the bureaucracy in the trias politica system where there is a classification of power, namely the executive, legislative and judiciary. Then, this paper will lead to the administration and implementation of public services. The conclusion from this paper is that government and bureaucracy are two different things and bureaucracy can become its own entity outside of the executive, legislative and judiciary and those in charge of providing public services are the bureaucrats, not the government, although actually bureaucrats and government have different roles in responsibility to deliver public service.
Bureaucracy: Meaning, Features and Role of Bureaucracy
Bureaucracy or the Civil Service constitutes the permanent and professional part of the executive organ of government. It is usually described as the non-political or politically neutral, permanent, and professionally trained civil service. It runs the administration of the state according to the policies and laws of the government political executive. Upon the qualities and efficiency of bureaucracy depend the quality and efficiency of the state administration? It, however, works under the leadership and control of the Political Executive. Bureaucracy: Meaning and Definition: The terms bureaucracy, civil service, public servants, public service, civil servants, government service, government servants, officials of government, officials, permanent executive and non-political executive are used to describe all such persons who carry out the day to day administration of the state. The terms Bureaucracy' and 'Civil Service' are popularly used as synonyms. Narrow and Broad uses of the term Bureaucracy: In a narrow sense the term Bureaucracy is used to denote those important and higher level public servants who occupy top level positions in the state administration. In the broad sense, it refers to all the permanent employees of the government right from the peons and clerks to the top level officials. Presently, we use the term in its broader dimension.
BUREAUCRACY AS A CONTROVERSY IN PUBLIC ADMINISTRATION: THE INTELLECTUAL ARGUMENTS
Bureaucracy as a concept has created a lot of controversies and tension among politician, academician, authors and even administrators alike, this paper attempts to critically evaluate and analyze the strength and weakness of bureaucracy. This researcher has identified two categories—the pessimist and optimist of bureaucracy. All of whom has shown sufficient reason to back their claims which this paper seeks to explore. The research also seeks to investigate Weber's ideal model and his dilemma on authority. It appears that Weber is more concerned with position and not the person who hold position and this has created a contradiction as some civil servant are promoted in to position based on their seniority and experience, and not competence. The issue here is, where does authority lies-in positions or in competency?
THE EVOLUTION OF THE CONCEPT OF BUREAUCRACY
The first half of the paper defines the concept of bureaucracy, its evolution over the time and the current academic debates. A short review of the most debatable theories written by Lowi, Niskanen, Dunleavy and Choudhury is included. The second half focuses on the three concepts of power put forward by Russel and the non-paid goals bureaucratic offices pursue on a daily basis. The paper also analyses the issue of monitoring the output of bureaucratic offices.
Social Consequences of Bureaucracy
Global Encyclopedia of Public Administration, Public Policy, and Governance. Springer, Cham., 2020
Bureaucracy is an organizational form that became dominant in business, government and other arenas during the nineteenth and twentieth centuries. Since then, extensive debates among sociologists and others have centered on its social impact, rationality and nature. The aim of bureaucracy is to standardize all activities within the organization and ensure that control passes from the top to the bottom. As such, owners and senior managers are allowed to control the organization in a more efficient and indirect way thus mitigating the risk of self-conflict and loss of control of the affairs of an organization. Nevertheless, excessive bureaucracy makes public organizations more arthritic and self-serving, hence, rendering them less able to achieve their core missions and less responsive to service users due to nepotism. Bureaucratic institutions are characterised by red tapism, excessive paper work, fear of innovation, poor customer service, duplication of working procedures, strict adherence to procedures, weak management practices, low morale, etc. This has resulted into many people nowadays having a negative perception of bureaucracy because it is rigid and responds slowly to environmental changes and that it relies heavily on rules and procedures.
Bureaucracy: Max Weber’s Concept and Its Application to Pakistan
International Relations and Diplomacy, 2018
To investigate Max Weber’s concept of bureaucracy and its relevance to Pakistan’s civil service, this study explains the system of governance followed in different nations, its function, and bureaucratic formulations in the well-managed and administered state. The paper analyzes reasons for the poor performance of Pakistani public service provision. International development doctrines pertaining to governance are based on accountable to the governments and effective bureaucracy. This study explores the formation of the Pakistani state and civil service and its role in the implementation of government policies. Irrespective of the system of governance followed across different nations, the presence, and functioning of a bureaucratic set-up is crucial to manage and administer the state. However, in Pakistan there has been an egregious failure of the bureaucratic set-up to achieve this vision. This study explores the reasons why based on Weberian sociological theory affirming that the main characteristic of bureaucracy is espirit de corps, doing things for the good of the institution (i.e., civil service) even if goes against the public interest. This study analyzes such orientation in the context of a major developing state, Pakistan. The essential principal function of bureaucracy is to honestly and sincerely implement the government policies on behalf of the people. The government provides representation of the national interest, mainly when democratically elected, while the bureaucracy provides skills and know-how; the latter is liable to the former, but often not directly to the public. Thus, bureaucrats are usually known as “civil servants”, who provide continuity in governance and daily life, despite the vagaries of changes in government. This is a qualitative research entirely based on literature survey from library data collected from books and articles.