Clinical value of traditional laparotomy, extensive vaginal hysterectomy, and laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (original) (raw)

Abstract

Background: Cervical cancer is a common malignant tumor in women. This study aims to explore the clinical effects of traditional laparotomy, extensive vaginal hysterectomy and laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III). Methods: A total of 79 cases with CIN III in situ who were treated in our hospital from July 2015 to February 2017 were selected as the study participants. According to the different surgical methods employed, patients were divided into a laparotomy group (n=21), a vaginal group (n=26), and a laparoscope-assisted vaginal group (n=32). The operative indicators in the three groups were compared, as well as the operative complications, quality of life, and female sexual function. Results: The operation time, intraoperative blood loss, and hospitalization time in the laparotomy group were all significantly greater than those in the vaginal and laparoscope-assisted vaginal groups (P<0.05), and the operative time was the shortest in the vaginal group. There was no significant difference in postoperative recovery time, drainage tube removal time, and time to out-of-bed activation between the vaginal group and the laparoscope-assisted vaginal group (P>0.05). After surgery, the main complications were poor wound healing, infection, vaginal discharge, and neoplasms of the vagina, and the total incidence of complications in the laparotomy group was 19.04%, which was significantly higher than that in the vaginal group (3.84%) and the laparoscope-assisted vaginal group (3.12%) (P<0.05). Three months after surgery, the physical and emotional function scores of patients in the laparoscope-assisted vaginal group were significantly higher than those in the laparotomy and vaginal groups (P<0.05). Six months after surgery, there were no significant differences among the three groups in scores of libido, sexual intercourse pain, orgasm, or difficulty in sexual intercourse (P>0.05). Conclusions: Laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy has a short recovery time and a low incidence of complications in patients with early cervical cancer in situ. Compared with laparotomy and vaginal hysterectomy, laparoscope-assisted vaginal hysterectomy is more conducive to improving the postoperative quality of life of patients.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (21)

  1. Olusola P, Banerjee HN, Philley JV, et al. Human Papilloma Virus-Associated Cervical Cancer and Health Disparities. Cells 2019;8:622.
  2. Moberg M, Gustavsson I, Gyllensten U. Type-specific associations of human papillomavirus load with risk of developing cervical carcinoma in situ. Int J Cancer 2004;112:854-9.
  3. Shrivastava SB, Agrawal G, Mittal M, et al. Management of Vaginal Cancer. Rev Recent Clin Trials 2015;10:289-97.
  4. Greggi S, Casella G, Scala F, et al. Surgical Management of Early Cervical Cancer: When Is Laparoscopic Appropriate? Curr Oncol Rep 2020;22:7.
  5. National Health Commission Of The People's Republic Of China. Chinese guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of cervical cancer 2018 (English version). Chin J Cancer Res 2019;31:295-305.
  6. Berggrund M, Gustavsson I, Aarnio R, et al. HPV viral load in self-collected vaginal fluid samples as predictor for presence of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. Virol J 2019;16:146.
  7. Josefsson AM, Magnusson PK, Ylitalo N, et al. Viral load of human papilloma virus 16 as a determinant for development of cervical carcinoma in situ: a nested case- control study. Lancet 2000;355:2189-93.
  8. Brucker SY, Ulrich UA. Surgical Treatment of Early-Stage Cervical Cancer. Oncol Res Treat 2016;39:508-14.
  9. Naga Ch P, Gurram L, Chopra S, et al. The management of locally advanced cervical cancer. Curr Opin Oncol 2018;30:323-9.
  10. Mallmann P, Mallmann C. Neoadjuvant and Adjuvant Chemotherapy of Cervical Cancer. Oncol Res Treat 2016;39:522-4.
  11. Simsek T, Ozekinci M, Saruhan Z, et al. Laparoscopic surgery compared to traditional abdominal surgery in the management of early stage cervical cancer. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol 2012;33:395-8.
  12. Liu Z, Li X, Tian S, et al. Superiority of robotic surgery for cervical cancer in comparison with traditional approaches: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Surg 2017;40:145-54.
  13. Zhang SS, Ding T, Cui ZH, et al. Efficacy of robotic radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer compared with that of open and laparoscopic surgery: A separate meta- analysis of high-quality studies. Medicine (Baltimore) 2019;98:e14171.
  14. Kuznicki ML, Chambers LM, Morton M, et al. Fertility- Sparing Surgery for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review of the Literature. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2021;28:513-26.e1.
  15. Ma X, Li Q, Wang JL, et al. Comparison of elastography based on transvaginal ultrasound and MRI in assessing parametrial invasion of cervical cancer. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc 2017;66:27-35.
  16. Kohler C, Hertel H, Herrmann J, et al. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy with transvaginal closure of vaginal cuff -a multicenter analysis. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019;29:845-50.
  17. King CR, Giles D. Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy and Laparoscopic-Assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am 2016;43:463-78.
  18. Querleu D, Leblanc E. Combined vaginal and laparoscopic approach for the surgical management of cervical cancer: a historic note. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2019;29:1228-9.
  19. Aarts JW, Nieboer TE, Johnson N, et al. Surgical approach to hysterectomy for benign gynaecological disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2015;2015:CD003677.
  20. Balgobin S, Maldonado PA, Chin K, et al. Safety of Manual Morcellation After Vaginal or Laparoscopic- assisted Vaginal Hysterectomy. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2016;23:542-7.
  21. English Language Editor: D. Fitzgerald) Cite this article as: Xu Y, Wu H, Huang C, Lu L. Clinical