Introduction: Two Oxford Handbooks on the History of Law (original) (raw)
2019, Rechtsgeschichte - Legal History
AI-generated Abstract
This text serves as an introduction and review of two Oxford Handbooks on the History of Law, which were published within weeks of each other. It discusses the significance of these volumes within the broader context of the Oxford Handbooks series, addressing their contributions to legal history and their reflection of the current state of diverse and fragmented legal historical scholarship. The review highlights the composition of authorial teams, issues of representation, and the generalized lack of a uniform methodology or narrative within the handbooks.
Related papers
Legal history is having a methodological moment. So is law (and, as it turns out, history as well). And not just in one country or legal system but across the common law/civil law divide. In this chapter I try to capture some aspects of this methodological moment—or moments— and then to add some reflections of my own that locate legal history within the enterprise of legal scholarship. More specifically, I will outline an approach to legal history that regards historical analysis as one mode of critical analysis of law, along with other modes of " interdisciplinary " analysis (economical, philosophical, sociological, literary, etc.) and " doctrinal " analysis. In this way, legal history plays a key role in the general effort to move beyond the long-standing and rhetorically useful, but ultimately unproductive, distinction between " modern " and " traditional " legal scholarship, and that between " common law " and " civil law " scholarship besides.
Professional jurists are often inquisitive about the subject matter of their calling and in the course of their careers may well develop fascinating insights into the law and those who interpret it. Their employers, however, be they governments, corporations, firms, or private clients, rarely show similar enthusiasm for such insights unless the hours spent pondering the social or historical significance of this or that legal view have a contemporary value that justifies the lawyer's fee.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.