What makes one an Israeli?' Negotiating identities in everyday representations of 'Israeliness'* (original) (raw)
2004, Nations and Nationalism
This paper examines the construction of a sense of Israeli identity which is not deducible from the public political discourse. It analyses common verbal representations of 'being an Israeli person', namely, what people in contemporary Israeli culture repeatedly say about Israelis, and how they position themselves vis-a`-vis the commonsensical agreements they exchange, assuming that the massive use of such cliche´s in certain contexts creates a discursive routine that has 'a life of its own', through which people constantly negotiate their self-images and their sense of belonging. It investigates the ways these representations create solidarity or demarcation and how such current popular representations relate to canonical veteran images of Israeli identity, notably that of the pre-state 'Native Israeli' (Sabra) archetype. The analysis is based on 295 anonymous open responses to the question 'What makes one an Israeli?' published weekly in the Weekend Supplement of Maariv, the second largest newspaper in Israel, between 1996 and 1998. The analysis has led to the following observations: (1) Instead of the most expected grand ideological (ethnic, national, religious, etc.) issues of conflict, the responses reveal a 'pursuit of culturedness', using an implied scale of mastering good manners and possessing a 'genuine culture' which form the dominant parameter of judging the 'Israeli person'. (2) A tension between mainstream and marginalised groups is shaped by a 'chase and flight' dynamic of embracing and rejecting the mythological Sabra image (in asymmetry with these groups' assumed political stances), which image is believed to be a symbol of the once hegemonic veteran elite. (3) This tension paradoxically contributes to the persistence of the canonical image of the Sabra that is currently delegitimised by much intellectual discourse.
Related papers
Bridging Dichotomies Reflected in Israeli-Jewish Identity Discourse
Israeli identity has been influenced by two major oppositional pairs which guide the worldview of its subscribers: the religious verses ethno-national framing of Jewish peoplehood; and an East – West division of the world used in asserting authority and authenticity within the discourse. The religious – ethno-national opposition, which is dominating the Israeli-Jewish identity discourse, has different faces to it. It is expressed through struggles between modernity and orthodoxy, past and present, and religiosity and secularity all nested in one another. Furthermore, this opposition intersects with debates over unity or multiplicity of Israeli-Jewish identity. In this paper I will focus on the modernity – orthodoxy opposition. Struggles between past-present, and religiosity-secularity will be discussed with relevance to the tension between modernity and orthodoxy. Next is a discussion on the influence of the East-West paradigm on Israeli-Jewish identity discourse. More specifically the part Orientalism has played and is still playing in Israeli-Jewish identity. In conclusion, I put forward two ways these dichotomizing pairs have been bridged in present day Israel. One is traditionalism which grew out of the Jewish-Arab milieu. The other is the reclaiming of Jewish religious heritage by so called ‘ethno-national’ Israeli-Jews, which in affect move to break the religious orthodoxy’s monopoly in Israel.
Social Identities, 2006
This article examines strategies of detachment and engagement in the ongoing struggles over defining a collective sense of 'Israeli identity' that take place in contemporary Israeli everyday discourse, and which is intended for insiders alone. The analysis compares material from two different samples of voluntary formulations of 'how Israelis behave' offered by anonymous Israelis in domestic public forums: one is a collection of about 300 folkloric aphorisms in a popular newspaper column, and the other includes over 1700 online talk-backs to 14 Internet reports about the bad reputation of Israelis abroad. These miscellaneous materials reveal a heated contest for the right to condemn a generalized collective image of 'an Israeli person'. Mobilizing alternatively two value-paradigms, that of 'European codes of civilized behaviour' (an outside perspective) and that of 'local patriotism' (an inside perspective), a negative collective image of 'misbehaved person' is established, towards which conflicting group-attitudes are formed. Four main strategies are observed in disputing or confirming this negative image: a total personal alienation; patronizing engagement; a variety of denial tactics; and a provocative identification with 'uncivilizedness' as an 'authentic Israeli mindset'.
Ethos and identity: Expressions and changes in the Israeli Jewish society
Estudios de Psicología, 2006
A fundamental condition for the evolvement of any society is the development of social identity, which confers a sense of belonging and identification. The meaning of social identity is influenced by the ethos that members of a society share. The ethos consists of shared, central societal beliefs that give the society a dominant orientation and characterize it. The societal beliefs that underlie the ethos can change as a result of new, prolonged experiences of the society. Israeli society presents an example of such a process.
Review Article: The Immovable Fight over the Transitional Nature of Israeli Identity
2007
Academic research of identity-related issues is a fascinating global phenomenon, both in terms of the detailed examination of worldwide events and in terms of research theories attempting to define their common denominators within various frameworks. A particularly interesting strand of identity research deals with immigrant societies coping with stresses and conflicts on at least two levels: first, between groups of diverse ethnic and cultural origins within the immigrant society, and second, between the immigrant society as a whole and the local, ‘native’ society encountered in the target country (which is usually also composed of several subgroups which tend to experience a certain degree of conflict themselves). The Israeli case, both as an arena for events and as an area of research, is unique. First, Israeli society bears the burden of a complex historic legacy characterized by identity struggles within the Jewish community since the Enlightenment. Second, British Journal of M...
Journal of Borderlands Studies, 2015
In this article we problematize the taken-for-granted nature of the dichotomy between Palestinian and Israeli, or Arab and Jew by illustrating how these identity categories are referenced and navigated by Israelis and Palestinians (Arabs and Jews) in their daily life. Using examples from our observations and conversations with individuals in the region, we argue that while the categories of Jewish/Arab and Israel/Palestine serve as dichotomous organizing frameworks, the lived experiences of individuals reveal complexity, variability, and tensions in how these categories are navigated, negotiated, and inhabited. Rather than clear and natural categories, by attending to the specificity of how these categories are discussed and used in everyday life we highlight a middle ground questioning the firmness of this assumed dichotomy. We suggest that attending to the contingent and varied nature of this dichotomy can serve as a starting point to create more inclusive means to discuss identity in the region.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.