REGIONAL DIVERSITY IN INDIA: A DECADE BEFORE AND AFTER THE NEW ECONOMIC POLICY OF 1991 (original) (raw)
Related papers
REGIONAL VARIATION AND DEVELOPMENT PERSPECTIVES: A STUDY OF NORTH EAST INDIA
IJRAR | www.ijrar.org | E-ISSN 2348-1269, P- ISSN 2349-5138, 2017
The success of all economic policies and programmes should be evaluated in terms of their ability to generate human capability, since all such policies are based ultimately for the betterment of the quality of lives of people. The goals of sustainable development can be achieved only through inclusive development. In formulating development policies, regional variation should be addressed properly otherwise lop-sided development will be invited that itself set backward dynamics. The present study finds that uneven human development across the states in the region is quite significant. The study also reveals that the socioeconomic components are having positive role in determining the level of human development in NorthEastern states. The study further supports the premise that along with economic growth, human capability expansion is also one of the obvious requirements for sustained human development in the Northeastern region.
REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT AND REGIONAL DISPARITIES IN INDIA
ABSTRACT Economic disparities are critical in nature and are the issues of great concern in the modern world. Especially in India, the rural sector has been victimized for various sorts of disparities in the fields of wealth, income, education, and development. Studies say that 50% of the total national income goes to the hands of only 20% of the total population and rest 80% of the total population has to depend on the remaining 50% part of total national income. Indians constitute about 17 per cent of world population. But we account for about 35 per cent of the poor and 40 per cent of the illiterates in the world. Economic Planning has been used in the country as an instrument for bringing about uniform regional development. But it’s not enough to us; these are not normal characteristics of a modern nation which is aspiring to be a world economic power. A decent society cannot be built on the ruins of hunger, malnutrition, ill health and illiteracy. If the trend continues, our chances of gaining from globalization on the strength of our human resources are slim. So, some major changes are to be happened. Trough this paper I am tempting to give a critical point of view of the disparities which the rural sectors face today as well as to prescribe enough solutions that will enrich the regional India of tomorrow.
Regional Disparities in Economic and Social Development: A State-wise Analysis
Social Vision, 2024
The present paper studies the regional disparities in economic and social development in India by developing a composite index, Regional Development Index (RDI). The study used census data of 2011 and Handbook of Statistics, RBI, 2018 including 27 states and four union territories (UTs) of India. The study concludes by ranking of states and UTs on the basis of composite development index (RDI) consisting of eight indicators. This paper also makes a comparison of selected states on the basis of HDI 2018 and computed RDI values. Categorization of States/UTs are done according to different stages of development like highly developed state, middle developed state, lower middle developed state and least developed state. The findings show that Kerala and Goa are the best states amongst all states in India in terms of development (RDI) and also HDI values. States like Odisha, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar have not improved much in terms of development. Results of the study established large disparities at states/UTs level in India. Though several steps are taken to reduce the regional disparities, sizeable differences in development exist among states. In order to deal with this problem, the states need to focus on both economic and social factors for improving the income as well as reducing poverty and generation of more employment opportunities to the deprived regions like Bihar, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh Odisha etc. High income growth is not the only factor for development, improving levels of education and health and removal of poverty should be given priority to directly enhance development of least developed states.
Socio-Economic Regional Disparities in National Development
IRJET, 2022
Local differences in India has been a standout amongst the most basic advancement issue which has pulled in worries from all quarters, be it approach producers, strategy implementers, academicians or the general public on the loose. It has by and by touched off the discussion on the current disparities between the created and immature nations when all is said in done and between various areas inside these nations specifically. The bury and intra-territorial imbalances of the nation are being watched not just as far as their differential macroeconomic parameters like GDP, GNP and so on yet in addition in connection to different statistic and social advancement markers, for example, wellbeing, instruction, business and so on. India being a creating nation, it turns into even more critical to examine these inconsistencies as the new financial strategies have additionally augmented the hole between the rich and the poor states. The present investigation plans to break down the examples of the local variations in the dimensions of improvement in India. Thinking about this, four pointers have been chosen to recognize the spatial examples of regional disparities in India.
Policy Initiative for Balance Regional Development and Growth
Theoretical Economics Letters, 2018
The economics growth and development mostly coined together, and it was thought that growth itself led to development of the country but it was found that there are more dissimilarities than complementary. A higher growth will spontaneously lead development only when there is equitable distribution of resources and balancing regional development. But it did not happen in practices as high growth widen inequality and unequal distribution between the different groups of people in the societies as well between interstate and intra-state to create regional imbalance, further as there is a transition period of the economy and urbanization took place it was experienced that regional imbalance widen in the term of class difference, gender discrimination (lower participation of women, as well alarming sex ratio), resources distribution, and per capital income. Further, the regional economic disparities create more inequality between savings, investment, and had interconnected map over the vicious cycle of corruption, demographic challenges, influencing chronic & infectious diseases, illicit trade, migration, food insecurity, and governance failures. The paper is addressing those various issues and thrust area of policy initiatives to present the causes of regional imbalance and growth as well the policy initiative for inclusive development.
Review of Development and Change, 1999
Since early 1990s the country has taken recourse to Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), economic liberalization and globalization measures to solve the problem of low economic growth, surmounting external debt burden and balance of payment crisis. These measures popularly known as NEP (New Economic Policy) put emphasis on the primacy of the market economy and lo that effect the role of the Statein shaping the economy and society is progressively curtailed. However, whether such strategy of development will be helpful in reducing socioeconomic disparities between place and people in a pluralistic and multi-ethnic society laden with particularistic and ascriptive values of the hierarchical caste system is doubtful. Thus, analyzing the trend of inter-Statelevel development disparities in Post-Independent India and the flow of capital investment lo different States during post liberalization years, the present paper apprehends that disparities between place and people will accentuate further, if necessary corrective measures are not taken by the State to eliminate market distortions.
Review of Development and Change
Since early 1990s the country has taken recourse to Structural Adjustment Programme (SAP), economic liberalization and globalization measures to solve the problem of low economic growth, surmounting external debt burden and balance of payment crisis. These measures popularly known as NEP (New Economic Policy) put emphasis on the primacy of the market economy and lo that effect the role of the Statein shaping the economy and society is progressively curtailed. However, whether such strategy of development will be helpful in reducing socioeconomic disparities between place and people in a pluralistic and multi-ethnic society laden with particularistic and ascriptive values of the hierarchical caste system is doubtful. Thus, analyzing the trend of inter-Statelevel development disparities in Post-Independent India and the flow of capital investment lo different States during post liberalization years, the present paper apprehends that disparities between place and people will accentuate further, if necessary corrective measures are not taken by the State to eliminate market distortions.
Regional Disparities in Human Development in India
This paper analyses regional disparities amongst major states in India to find out if they are on a convergence or further divergence course. The human development is not equal over the nation are any regions, it is spatialline quality refers to the uneven distribution of socio-economic variables across India.Measuringspatial inequality usually involves calculating their socio economic parameters. The government of India has lunched many socio-economic programmes like, education, health, work and supply of electricity for all villages, irrigation for every piece of land etc. for development of human resource. Urbanization, Working Force, Literacy, poverty of people are the main factors of development. Therefore necessary to identify the state which is backward with respect to the development of particular parameters. The Indian regional data suggests two-way causality between human and economic development. The paper then suggests and applies a method for computing targets aiming at reducing regional disparities systematically. Finally a number of inequality and polarization measures are employed to see the change in inequality and polarization over the decade and whether the suggested method results in a reduction in both these phenomena.