Deep brain stimulation and medication for parkinsonian tremor during secondary tasks (original) (raw)
Related papers
Brain, 2004
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and antiparkinsonian medication have proved to be effective treatments for tremor in Parkinson's disease. To date it is not known how and to what extent STN DBS alone and in combination with antiparkinsonian medication alters the pathophysiology of resting and postural tremor in idiopathic Parkinson's disease. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of STN DBS and antiparkinsonian medication on the neurophysiological characteristics of resting and postural hand tremor in Parkinson's disease. Resting and postural hand tremor were recorded using accelerometry and surface electromyography (EMG) from 10 Parkinson's disease patients and 10 matched control subjects. The Parkinson's disease subjects were examined under four treatment conditions: (i) off treatment; (ii) STN DBS; (iii) medication; and (iv) medication plus STN DBS. The amplitude, EMG frequency, regularity, and 1-8 Hz tremor-EMG coherence were analysed. Both STN DBS and medication reduced the amplitude, regularity and tremor-EMG coherence, and increased the EMG frequency of resting and postural tremor in Parkinson's disease. STN DBS was more effective than medication in reducing the amplitude and increasing the frequency of resting and postural tremor to healthy physiological levels. These findings provide strong evidence that effective STN DBS normalizes the amplitude and frequency of tremor. The findings suggest that neural activity in the STN is an important modulator of the neural network(s) responsible for both resting and postural tremor genesis in Parkinson's disease.
Deep Brain Stimulation Target Selection in Co-Morbid Essential Tremor and Parkinson’s Disease
Tremor and Other Hyperkinetic Movements, 2020
A 64-year-old right-handed male with essential tremor (ET) since the age of 18 presented for management of debilitating bilateral upper extremity action tremor. As a result, he had difficulty using his hands for eating, buttoning his clothes, and shaving. One year before presentation, he had also developed left lower extremity resting tremor. He had failed propranolol due to a lack of efficacy and could not tolerate primidone due to adverse effects. In addition to bilateral upper extremity action tremor (see Figure 1 for spiral drawing), examination showed rest tremor in both upper and lower extremities, chin tremor, hypomimia, hypometric saccadic eye movements, along with reduced arm swing and stride length when walking. Bradykinesia was present bilaterally but could not be accurately quantified due to severe overlying tremor. A clinical diagnosis of ET and Parkinson's disease (PD) was made, based on the long-standing history of action tremor with onset in the upper extremities (ET), and more recent development of asymmetric rest tremor, bradykinesia and hypomimia (PD) [1]. A trial of a low dose of carbidopa-levodopa did not offer many benefits and was subsequently discontinued per patient preference. He was thus referred for deep brain stimulation (DBS) to address refractory tremor. Clinical Dilemma DBS is recommended for PD patients with medically refractory tremor or motor fluctuations. Studies have shown comparable improvement in motor symptoms with stimulation
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, 2013
Background: Observation of the signals recorded from the extremities of Parkinson's disease patients showing rest and/or action tremor reveal a distinct high power resonance peak in the frequency band corresponding to tremor. The aim of the study was to investigate, using quantitative measures, how clinically effective and less effective deep brain stimulation protocols redistribute movement power over the frequency bands associated with movement, pathological and physiological tremor, and whether normal physiological tremor may reappear during those periods that tremor is absent. Methods: The power spectral density patterns of rest and action tremor were studied in 7 Parkinson's disease patients treated with (bilateral) deep brain stimulation of the subthalamic nucleus. Two tests were carried out: 1) the patient was sitting at rest; 2) the patient performed a hand or foot tapping movement. Each test was repeated four times for each extremity with different stimulation settings applied during each repetition. Tremor intermittency was taken into account by classifying each 3-second window of the recorded angular velocity signals as a tremor or non-tremor window. Results: The distribution of power over the low frequency band (<3.5 Hzvoluntary movement), tremor band (3.5-7.5 Hz) and high frequency band (>7.5 Hznormal physiological tremor) revealed that rest and action tremor show a similar power-frequency shift related to tremor absence and presence: when tremor is present most power is contained in the tremor frequency band; when tremor is absent lower frequencies dominate. Even under resting conditions a relatively large low frequency component became prominent, which seemed to compensate for tremor. Tremor absence did not result in the reappearance of normal physiological tremor. Conclusion: Parkinson's disease patients continuously balance between tremor and tremor suppression or compensation expressed by power shifts between the low frequency band and the tremor frequency band during rest and voluntary motor actions. This balance shows that the pathological tremor is either on or off, with the latter state not resembling that of a healthy subject. Deep brain stimulation can reverse the balance thereby either switching tremor on or off.
Acta Neurochirurgica
Background Therapeutic effects of deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in Parkinson’s disease (PD) may in parts be attributed to the stimulation of white matter near the targeted structure. The dentato-rubro-thalamic (DRT) tract supposed to improve tremor control in patients with essential tremor could be one candidate structure. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of stimulation proximity to the DRT on tremor control in PD patients treated with STN-DBS. Methods For this retrospective analysis, we included 36 consecutive patients (median age 65.5 years) treated with STN-DBS for disabling motor symptoms including tremor. Stereotactic implantation of DBS electrodes into the motor area of the STN was performed using direct MRI-based targeting and intraoperative microelectrode recording. Tremor severity was assessed preoperatively and at regular intervals postoperatively (Unified Parkinson’s Disease Rating Scale III). The DRT was visualized in 60...
Deep brain stimulation in the posterior subthalamic area in the treatment of essential tremor
Movement Disorders, 2010
To evaluate the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) as a target for deep brain stimulation (DBS) in the treatment of essential tremor (ET). The ventral intermediate nucleus of the thalamus is the traditional target for DBS in the treatment of ET. Recent studies have presented beneficial effects of DBS in the PSA in the treatment of tremor. Twenty-one patients with ET were included in this study. All patients were evaluated before and 1 year after surgery, on and off stimulation, using the essential tremor rating scale (ETRS). A marked microlesional effect was noticed in 83%, in some cases obviating the need for electrical stimulation for many months. The total ETRS was reduced from 46.2 at baseline to 18.7 (60%). Item 5/6 (tremor of the upper extremity) was improved from 6.2 to 0.3 (95%), and items 11 to 14 (hand function) from 9.7 to 1.3 (87%) concerning the contralateral hand. Activities of daily living were improved by 66%. No severe complication occurred. Eight patients presented a postoperative mild dysphasia that regressed within days to weeks. DBS in the PSA resulted in a marked reduction of tremor.
Journal of neurology, 2011
In patients with essential tremor (ET) already treated with chronic deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the nucleus ventralis intermedius (VIM) we investigated whether optimization of stimulation parameters could improve clinical tremor suppression, and whether this putative effect could be sustained over time. Twenty-three ET patients with VIM-DBS participated in the prospective study. All electrode contacts were tested systematically and stimulation parameters were optimized over the course of 2 days. Clinical tremor rating scale (TRS) was videotaped before, directly after the optimization and at a 10 weeks follow-up and evaluated blindly and independently by two clinicians. For stimulation effect optimization we increased the number of active contacts whereas the total charge applied to the tissue was kept constant. TRS hemi-body scores decreased significantly after optimization. At the 10 weeks follow-up, however, the improvement had faded and was no longer significant. The activiti...
Deep Brain Stimulation for Arm Tremor: A Randomized Trial Comparing Two Targets
Annals of Neurology, 2022
ObjectiveDeep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamic ventral intermediate nucleus (VIM) effectively suppresses arm tremor. Uncontrolled studies suggest the posterior subthalamic area (PSA) may be superior. We compared the intra‐individual efficacy of VIM‐ versus PSA‐DBS on tremor suppression and arm function.MethodsWe performed a randomized, double‐blind, crossover trial at Oslo University Hospital in patients (18–80 years) with isolated or combined action tremor affecting at least one arm. Four‐contact DBS leads were implanted (bi‐ or unilaterally) with a trajectory to cover the VIM (upper two contacts) and PSA (lower two contacts). Patients were randomized (1:1 ratio) post‐surgery to: Group 1, VIM‐stimulation months 0–3 (period 1), then PSA‐stimulation months 4–6 (period 2); Group 2, PSA‐stimulation first, then VIM‐stimulation. Primary endpoint was the difference in improvement from baseline to the end of the VIM‐ versus PSA‐period in the sum of the dominant arm tremor scores of ...
Modulation of tremor amplitude during deep brain stimulation at different frequencies
Brain and Cognition, 2003
Rest tremor was quantified in the index finger tip of 16 patients with ParkinsonÕs disease (PD) receiving deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the ventro-intermediate nucleus (Vim) of the thalamus, the subthalamic nucleus (STN), or the internal part of the globus pallidus (GPi) while being off L L -dopa for 12 h. Clinically, without DBS, tremor amplitude varied from absent to high. Tremor was recorded continuously for about 5 min under three conditions of DBS repeated twice, namely, effective frequency (E), ineffective frequency (I), and no DBS (O). No changes in tremor were observed across conditions in subjects with little or no tremor. However, in subjects with moderate to large amplitude tremor, DBS decreased tremor amplitude to near normal values within a few seconds. Generally, transitions were progressive and occurred with a varying time delay. Occasionally, tremor escaped from control regardless of the stimulation condition considered. In some cases tremor amplitude in one condition appeared to depend on the preceding condition. Finally, the results were reproducible on two consecutive days. We conclude that tremor control with DBS follows specific dynamical rules, which must be compatible with the hypotheses proposed regarding the underlying mechanisms of DBS.
Parkinsonism & related disorders, 2018
To compare subthalamic nucleus (STN) deep brain stimulation (DBS) with globus pallidus interna (GPi) DBS for tremor suppression in Parkinson disease (PD). DBS is an effective surgical therapy that has been shown to provide significant benefit for motor symptoms in PD. Currently, two main structures targeted to treat motor complications in PD are the STN and GPi. Although some groups traditionally favor STN over GPi for tremor suppression, evidence demonstrating superiority in long-term tremor control is limited. We performed a systematic review for all randomized trials comparing STN vs GPi DBS in PD that were published before March 2017. Five studies were examined in a random effects model meta-analysis. We conducted moderator variable analysis to determine if there was a treatment effect difference for STN versus GPi. We compared DBS ON versus OFF and found a significant overall standardized difference mean effect: Effect Size = 0.36; 95% CI = 0.316-0.395; P < 0.0001. These fin...
Acta neurochirurgica, 2016
Refractory tremor in tremor-dominant (TD) or equivalent-type (EQT) idiopathic Parkinson's syndrome (IPS) poses the challenge of choosing the best target region to for deep brain stimulation (DBS). While the subthalamic nucleus is typically chosen in younger patients as the target for dopamine-responsive motor symptoms, it is more complicated if tremor does not (fully) respond under trial conditions. In this report, we present the first results from simultaneous bilateral DBS of the DRT (dentato-rubro-thalamic tract) and the subthalamic nucleus (STN) in two elderly patients with EQT and TD IPS and dopamine-refractory tremor. Two patients received bilateral octopolar DBS electrodes in the STN additionally traversing the DRT region. Achieved electrode positions were determined with helical CT, overlaid onto DTI tractography data, and compared with clinical data of stimulation response. Both patients showed immediate and sustained improvement of their tremor, bilaterally. The propos...