Pro-Mithridatic and Pro-Roman Tendencies in Delos in the Early First Century BC: the case of Dikaios of Ionidai (ID 2039 and 2040) (original) (raw)

NEAR AND BEYOND THE ROMAN FRONTIER

Pontic sigillata discovered in the dacian settlement of Poiana, Nicoreşti commune, Galaţi county 17-46 Sigillatele pontice descoperite în aşezarea geto-dacică de la Poiana, comuna Nicoreşti, jud. Galaţi Sorin CLEŞIU Imports and roman imitations from the main dava type settlements on Siret River: Barboşi, Poiana, Brad, Răcătău 47-84 Importuri şi imitaţii de factură romană în principalele aşezări de tip dava de pe Siret: Barboşi, Poiana, Brad, Răcătău Vitalie BÂRCĂ Câteva consideraţii privind vasele metalice de import din mediul sarmatic nord-pontic 85-124 A few remarks on the import metal ware within the north-pontic sarmatian environment Horea POP, Cristinel PLANTOS Un import roman din zona Şimleu Silvaniei (jud. Sălaj) 125-128 An imported roman artifact at Şimleu Silvaniei (Sălaj county)

The process of Romanisation in the inland of the Roman province of Dalmatia in the 1st century (Acta Illyrica, Godišnjak Udruženja BATHINVS, Godina I / Broj 1)

In contemporary Roman historiography and archaeology the process of Romanisation is studied from two opposite viewpoints. Post-processualists and structuralists usually define Romanisation as a construct of Mommsen’s school of thought, whereas traditionalists believe that the process of Romanisation is one of the evident cultural and political processes that marked the Roman civilisation. For traditionalists it represents a process of cultural transformation that helped indigenous communities to integrate into the Roman Empire. Perhaps the best solution to this problem was offered by Curchin who believes that instead of giving up on the term Romanisation it’s better to deconstruct this term and revise it as a useful descriptor of an important cultural process in the Roman world. The inland of the Roman province of Dalmatia can serve as an exact example of the methodological analysis of the aforementioned historiographical problem. Although the 1st century in Dalmatia was marked by construction undertakings of Publius Cornelius Dolabella, the basic parameters of Romanisation in the inland can be observed not until under the Flavian dynasty. This is the period of first municipia in the inland: municipium Bist(uensium), municipium Malvesiatum, municipium Raetinum, municipium Arupium, municipium Doclea. We observe that local, pre-Roman aristocracy continues to reign in these municipia as part of the Roman administrative machinery. Therefore, even with Roman citizenship, indigenous elite did not renounce their pre-Roman identity. This can be inferred from epigraphic monuments of decuriones from the abovementioned municipia who, although being granted Roman citizenship, retained onomastic elements of Western Balkans (Illyrian) origin within their nomenclature (Bato, Blodus, Tatta, Epicadus, Laedio , Aplius and Annia). Local aristocracy evidently played a key role in spreading the Roman political power, because it took over the role of military prefects under the Julio-Claudian dynasty.

The material evidence of the Roman Cult of Mithras in Dacia. CIMRM Supplement of the province. In: Acta Ant. Hung. 58, 2018, 325–357 .

Acta Antiqua Academiae Scientiarum Hungaricae, 2018

Since M. J. Vermaseren’s visit to Romania and the publication of the second volume of his monumental corpus on Mithraic finds in 1960, the once-called “Mithraic Studies” has had numerous paradigmatic shifts and changed its major focus points. Besides the important changes in the theoretical background of the research, the archaeological material regarding the Mithraic finds of Dacia – one of the richest provinces in this kind of material – has also been enriched. Several new corpora focusing on the Mithraic finds of Dacia were published in the last decade. This article will present the latest currents in the study of the Roman cult of Mithras and will give an updated list of finds and several clarifications to the latest catalogue of Mithraic finds from the province

RECRUITMENT AND MANIPULATION IN THE ROMAN WORLD

Pontic sigillata discovered in the dacian settlement of Poiana, Nicoreşti commune, Galaţi county 17-46 Sigillatele pontice descoperite în aşezarea geto-dacică de la Poiana, comuna Nicoreşti, jud. Galaţi Sorin CLEŞIU Imports and roman imitations from the main dava type settlements on Siret River: Barboşi, Poiana, Brad, Răcătău 47-84 Importuri şi imitaţii de factură romană în principalele aşezări de tip dava de pe Siret: Barboşi, Poiana, Brad, Răcătău Vitalie BÂRCĂ Câteva consideraţii privind vasele metalice de import din mediul sarmatic nord-pontic 85-124 A few remarks on the import metal ware within the north-pontic sarmatian environment Horea POP, Cristinel PLANTOS Un import roman din zona Şimleu Silvaniei (jud. Sălaj) 125-128 An imported roman artifact at Şimleu Silvaniei (Sălaj county)