Parenting and Resilience: A Literature Review (original) (raw)

Is Resilience a Trait or a Result of Parental Involvement? The Results of a Systematic Literature Review

Education Sciences

Investigating parental involvement has moved to the foreground of research in the past two decades, and research results focusing on family engagement claim its positive impact on children’s academic and non-academic achievement. However, less is known about parental involvement in the case of families with children with special needs. In our systematic review, we collected studies focusing on parental involvement which emphasised the role of resilience. Using the EBSCO Discovery Service, a total of 467 abstracts from 85 databases were screened, of which 28 papers published between 1984 and 2021 met the research criteria. Papers vary according to methodology (interview, focus group conversation, survey, case study, intervention programme and good practice) and disability group (general or specific). Resilience is interpreted in two ways: as a personality trait or a consequence. Four types of papers could be detected which dealt with the target group, specifically papers focusing on ...

Perceived Parenting Styles and Development of Resilience in Higher Secondary School students

Parent-child relationship is one of most important protective factors in the development of resilience in children. The present study tries to understand if there is any difference in resilience of adolescents based on parenting styles. Participants include 300 higher secondary school students of the age group 15-17 from different schools in Kerala. Instruments used for the study are Scale of Parenting Style (Gafoor&Kurukkan, 2014) and Connor-Davidson's resilience scale. Perceived parenting style was identified on the basis of parental responsiveness and parental control scores and ANOVA was used to understand if the resilience level of children differed based on these styles. A significant difference was observed and the results of the post hoc test reveal that adolescents with authoritative and authoritarian parenting styles show more resilience when compared to those with negligent parenting style. The emergence of positive psychology in recent years laid a paradigm shift in the approach, direction and focus of psychology from psychopathology and treatment to prevention and promoting competence. Resilience is one important focus of this new area of psychology. Resilience is not about passive adaptation to adversities or trauma but it involves growing through difficulties and bouncing back from it through active and constructive means. Resilience is one of the most important contributing factors of well-being in students (Suresh, Jayachander, & Joshi, 2013). In the light of research on children over the past three decades, resilience generally refers to 'a class of phenomena characterized by patterns of positive adaptation in the context of significant adversity or risk' (Masten& Reed, 2002). Resilience is also defined as 'the process of effectively negotiating, adapting to, or managing significant sources of stress or trauma'. Assets and resources within the individual, their life and environment facilitate this capacity for adaptation and 'bouncing back' in the face of adversity (Windle, 2010). Resilience as a social ecological construct has presented a more ecological understanding of resilience. Resilience is determined by both internal as well as external factors and an outcome of interactions between these two determinants. Internal determinants include psychological and biological factors whereas external determinants include quality and nature of environment as well as relationships within and outside family (Masten & Reed, 2002; Ungar, et al., 2007; Zakeri, Jowkar, & Razmjoee,

Parenting and Children’s Resilience in Disadvantaged Communities

SCOTTISH YOUTH ISSUES JOURNAL SCOTTISH …

An exploration of how families in disadvantaged communities manage parent-child relationships. Recent government policies in relation to child welfare, juvenile justice and area regeneration emphasise the importance of effective parenting. Parent-focused interventions primarily affect families living in disadvantaged communities, but there has been relatively little research into the challenges of bringing up children in these environments. This report explores how families in these communities manage parent-child relationships during the middle childhood.

Resilience as regulation of family and developmental processes

Family Relations

Resilience can be defined as establishing equilibrium subsequent to disturbances to a system caused by significant adversity. When families experience adversity or transitions, multiple regulatory processes may be involved in establishing equilibrium, including adaptability, regulation of negative affect, and effective problem-solving skills. The authors' resilience-as-regulation perspective integrates insights about the regulation of individual development with processes that regulate family systems. This middle-range theory of family resilience focuses on regulatory processes across levels that are involved in adaptation: whole-family systems such as routines and sense of coherence; coregulation of dyads involving emotion regulation, structuring, and reciprocal influences between social partners; and individual self-regulation. Insights about resilience-as-regulation are then applied to family-strengthening interventions that are designed to promote adaptation to adversity. Unresolved issues are discussed in relation to resilience-as-regulation in families, in particular how risk exposure is assessed, interrelations among family regulatory mechanisms, and how families scaffold the development of children's resilience.

A Review of Family Resilience: Understanding the Concept and Operationalization Challenges to Inform Research and Practice

Child Care in Practice

Family resilience is a concept that has wide and deep roots, ranging from the development of the concept of individual resilience to the postulates of general systems theory, including family systems theory and related therapeutic models as well as studies on family stress and coping. Integration of these roots into a comprehensive theory remains incomplete. Consequently, numerous ambiguities in the conceptualization and operationalization of the concept of family resilience remain. This has important implications for both research and the application of the concept to practice. This article aims to contribute to the clarification and understanding of this evolving concept by reviewing the foundations upon which the concept of family resilience has emerged and has been developing. Our work connects family resilience to the concepts of individual resilience, as well as, community resilience, presenting key challenges but also possible solutions in operationalizing indicators of risk, protective factors, and good outcomes. This article discusses the influence of context and dominant social discourses in defining both risk exposure and family adaptation, highlighting community engagement as a core resilience resource. The article concludes by presenting the challenges that remain in the field of family resilience research, especially in light of the relevance of this concept to interventions and practice pertaining to child and youth care practice.

Resilience as Regulation of Developmental and Family Processes

Family Relations, 2015

Resilience can be defined as establishing equilibrium subsequent to disturbances to a system caused by significant adversity. When families experience adversity or transitions, multiple regulatory processes may be involved in establishing equilibrium, including adaptability, regulation of negative affect, and effective problem-solving skills. The authors’ resilience-as-regulation perspective integrates insights about the regulation of individual development with processes that regulate family systems. This middle-range theory of family resilience focuses on regulatory processes across levels that are involved in adaptation: whole-family systems such as routines and sense of coherence; coregulation of dyads involving emotion regulation, structuring, and reciprocal influences between social partners; and individual self-regulation. Insights about resilience-as regulation are then applied to family-strengthening interventions that are designed to promote adaptation to adversity. Unresolved issues are discussed in relation to resilience-as-regulation in families, in particular how risk exposure is assessed, interrelations among family regulatory mechanisms, and how families scaffold the development of children’s resilience.