India's rank and proportionate share in the global research output part 2: how publication counting method and subject selection can vary the outcomes (original) (raw)
Related papers
arXiv: Digital Libraries, 2020
During the last two decades, India has emerged as a major knowledge producer in the world, however different reports put it at different ranks, varying from 3rd to 9th places. The recent commissioned study reports of Department of Science and Technology (DST) done by Elsevier and Clarivate Analytics, rank India at 5thand 9th places, respectively. On the other hand, an independent report by National Science Foundation (NSF) of United States (US), ranks India at 3rd place on research output in Science and Engineering area. Interestingly, both, the Elsevier and the NSF reports use Scopus data, and yet surprisingly their outcomes are different. This article, therefore, attempts to investigate as to how the use of same database can still produce different outcomes, due to differences in methodological approaches. The publication counting method used and the subject selection approach are the two main exogenous factors identified to cause these variations. The implications of the analytic...
ArXiv, 2020
India is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports places India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in dif...
arXiv: Digital Libraries, 2020
India is emerging as a major knowledge producer of the world in terms of proportionate share of global research output and the overall research productivity rank. Many recent reports, both of commissioned studies from Government of India as well as independent international agencies, show India at different ranks of global research productivity (variations as large as from 3rd to 9th place). The paper examines this contradiction; tries to analyse as to why different reports places India at different ranks and what may be the reasons thereof. The research output data for India, along with the ten most productive countries in the world, is analysed from three major scholarly databases: Web of Science, Scopus and Dimensions for this purpose. Results show that both, the endogenous factors (such as database coverage variation and different subject classification schemes) and the exogenous factors (such as subject selection and publication counting methodology) cause the variations in dif...
Current Science (Bangalore), 2010
We have carried out a three-part study comparing the research performance of Indian institutions with that of other international institutions. In the first part, the publication profiles of various Indian institutions were examined and ranked based on the h-index and p-index. We found that the institutions of national importance contributed the highest in terms of publications and citations per institution. In the second part of the study, we looked at the publication profiles of various Indian institutions in the high-impact journals and compared ...
Indian Publication Output during 1998-2009: Quantitative Analysis Based on Web of Science
Journal of Indian Library Association, 2011
An attempt has been made to study the Indian publications output under various parameters viz.Publications counts, Journals covered, Subject, language, and Institutions wise distribution along with the Collaboration country pattern taking web of Science as the source. Publications show the steady growth in number of total items during 1998 to 2009. It is observed that in the field of Basic sciences Indian scientists prefer to publish more papers in non Indian journals covered by SCI, and reverse trend is observed for applied sciences. Institution wise highest numbers of items have contributed by the authors of Indian Institution of Technology followed by Indian Institute of Science, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, and All Indian Institution of Medical science. Indian researchers collaboration pattern show a positive trend with USA authors. From the study it has been noticed that there is no difference in findings of earlier studies in respect of publications output though taken for the different time periods. It is concluded that overall trend almost remains the same as reported in the earlier studies which have also taken qualitative aspect in view.
Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur: A Scientometric study of Research Output
SSARSC International Journal of Library Information Network and Knowledge, 2016
The paper deals with the analysis of publications of Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur (IIT Kharagpur) during 2000 to 2015 appeared in SCOPUS database. It attempts to analyze the growth and development of research activity of IIT Kharagpur as reflected in publications output. Data for a total of 18927 have been downloaded and analysed according to objectives. The study reveals that the growth of literature follows the exponential growth pattern, journal articles are the most published form of literature (74.37%), Journal of Applied Polymer Science and Journal of Applied Physics are top journals, Jadavpur University and National Institute of Technology are top collaborating institutions/university with Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur. The highly productive subject areas are engineering and materials science, computer science, physics and astronomy. US, Germany and UK are the most favored countries for collaborations and authorship pattern analysis shows that degree of collaboration (0.95) significantly high. Suggests that periodically this type of data be reflected along with institutional repositories of the respective institutions.
Growth of Indian Research in Science and Technology: A Scientometric Analysis
Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021
This article carried out a Scientometric analysis of research publications published in various science and technology journals from 2011 to 2020 from India. Required data was retrieved from WoS database during the study period it provides information about the science and technology related publications from India. Especially, scientific data on the top research areas and distribution of publication collaborations in different dimensions of geography, authors, funding agencies, subjects and others. It examines the year wise publications, annual distribution of publications, most prolific authors, authors and organisations productivity, etc. Analysis found that, highest research publications are published in the year 2019 with 13.16%, followed by 2020 with 12.98% and in the year 2018 with 11.51%. Research articles are published 81.51% compared to any other type of publications from all over India. 88% of the research fund is provided by the Government of India, and remaining are from the western world among the top ten funding agencies. Out of top ten journals, seven (76%) of them are originated from India, two are from United Kingdom and one journal is from United States of America. During the study period, it is observed that, a mean relative growth rate is 0.26. Notably, the doubling time for the publications has decreased from 0.35 in the first five years to 0.17 in the last five years. Publications are raised on an average of 4.72% per year. On the whole, 208 countries collaborators contributed to these publications.