The Clinical Function Comparison of Post Operative Nerve Grafting and Nerve Transfer in Patients with Brachial Plexus Injury (original) (raw)
Related papers
Surgical outcomes following nerve transfers in upper brachial plexus injuries
Indian Journal of Plastic Surgery, 2009
Background: Brachial plexus injuries represent devastating injuries with a poor prognosis. Neurolysis, nerve repair, nerve grafts, nerve transfer, functioning free-muscle transfer and pedicle muscle transfer are the main surgical procedures for treating these injuries. Among these, nerve transfer or neurotization is mainly indicated in root avulsion injury. Materials and Methods: We analysed the results of various neurotization techniques in 20 patients (age group 20-41 years, mean 25.7 years) in terms of denervation time, recovery time and functional results. The inclusion criteria for the study included irreparable injuries to the upper roots of brachial plexus (C5, C6 and C7 roots in various combinations), surgery within 10 months of injury and a minimum follow-up period of 18 months. The average denervation period was 4.2 months. Shoulder functions were restored by transfer of spinal accessory nerve to suprascapular nerve (19 patients), and phrenic nerve to suprascapular nerve (1 patient). In 11 patients, axillary nerve was also neurotized using different donors-radial nerve branch to the long head triceps (7 patients), intercostal nerves (2 patients), and phrenic nerve with nerve graft (2 patients). Elbow flexion was restored by transfer of ulnar nerve motor fascicle to the motor branch of biceps (4 patients), both ulnar and median nerve motor fascicles to the biceps and brachialis motor nerves (10 patients), spinal accessory nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening sural nerve graft (1 patient), intercostal nerves (3rd, 4th and 5th) to musculocutaneous nerve (4 patients) and phrenic nerve to musculocutaneous nerve with an intervening graft (1 patient). Results: Motor and sensory recovery was assessed according to Medical Research Council (MRC) Scoring system. In shoulder abduction, five patients scored M4 and three patients M3+. Fair results were obtained in remaining 12 patients. The achieved abduction averaged 95 degrees (range, 50-170 degrees). Eight patients scored M4 power in elbow flexion and assessed as excellent results. Good results (M3+) were obtained in seven patients. Five patients had fair results (M2+ to M3).
Nerve Transfers in Adult Brachial Plexus Injuries
Advances in Spine Surgery [Working Title]
Brachial plexus injuries are semi-emergency conditions that require early intervention. Nerve transfers in adult brachial plexus injuries have become the standard treatment that gives reasonably good results if performed before the degeneration of muscle end plates. A clinical diagnosis based on clinical examinations supported by radiological and electrophysiological investigations is required that guides the specific procedures to be chosen. The surgeons must prioritize the objectives of reconstruction and keeping the different lifeboats for the use in future before choosing a specific nerve transfer. Also, it is important to be familiar with different nerve transfers so that one can select and perform a specific one based on pre-operative examinations and intraoperative findings of nerve stimulations. The author aims to describe the approach for exploring and dissecting the brachial plexus and different surgical techniques of nerve transfers used for different muscle reinnervation...
Nerve transfer to relieve pain in upper brachial plexus injuries: Does it work?
Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2017
Patients with C5 and C6 nerve root avulsion may complain from pain. For these patients, end-to-side nerve transfer of the superficial radial nerve into the median nerve is suggested to relieve pain. Eleven patients (with a primary brachial plexus reconstruction) undergoing end-to-side nerve transfer of the superficial radial nerve into the ulnovolar part of the median nerve were assessed. Pain before surgery was compared to that at 6-month follow-up using visual analog scale (VAS) scores. A significant difference was seen between the mean VAS before (8.5) and after surgery (0.7) (P=0.0). After the six-month follow-up, 6 patients felt no pain according to VAS, notwithstanding 5 patients with a mild pain. The evidence from the present study suggests that end-to-side nerve transfer of the superficial radial nerve into the ulnovolar part of the median nerve is an effective technique in reducing pain in patients with C5 and C6 nerve root avulsion.
Complications of Intercostal Nerve Transfer for Brachial Plexus Reconstruction
The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2010
Purpose Although numerous publications discuss outcomes of intercostal nerve transfer for brachial plexus injury, few publications have addressed factors associated with intercostal nerve viability or the impact perioperative nerve transfer complications have on postoperative nerve function. The purposes of this study were to report the results of perioperative intercostal nerve transfer complications and to determine whether chest wall trauma is associated with damaged or nonviable intercostal nerves. Methods All patients who underwent intercostal nerve transfer as part of a brachial plexus reconstruction procedure as a result of injury were identified. A total of 459 nerves in 153 patients were transferred between 1989 and 2007. Most nerves were transferred for use in biceps innervation, free-functioning gracilis muscle innervation, or a combination of the two. Patient demographics, trauma mechanism, associated injuries, intraoperative nerve viability, and perioperative complications were reviewed. Results Complications occurred in 23 of 153 patients. The most common complication was pleural tear during nerve elevation, occurring in 14 of 153 patients. Superficial wound infection occurred in 3 patients, whereas symptomatic pleural effusion, acute respiratory distress syndrome, and seroma formation each occurred in 2 patients. The rate of complications increased with the number of intercostal nerves transferred. Nerves were harvested from previously fractured rib levels in 50 patients. Rib fractures were not associated with an increased risk of overall complications but were associated with an increased risk of lack of nerve viability. In patients with rib fractures, intraoperative nerve stimulation revealed 148 of 161 nerves to be functional; these were subsequently transferred. In patients with preoperative ipsilateral phrenic nerve palsy, the risk of increased complications was marginally significant. Conclusions Brachial plexus reconstruction using intercostal nerves can be challenging, especially if there is antecedent chest wall trauma. Complications were associated with increasing numbers of intercostal nerves transferred. Ipsilateral rib fracture was adversely associated with intercostal nerve viability; it was not significantly associated with complication risk and should not be considered a contraindication to transfer. Preoperative phrenic nerve palsy was marginally associated with the likelihood of complications but not postoperative respiratory dysfunction when associated with intercostal nerve transfer.
Collateral branches of the brachial plexus as donors in nerve transfers
Vojnosanitetski pregled, 2012
Background/Aim. Nerve transfers in cases of directly irreparable, or high level extensive brachial plexus traction injuries are performed using a variety of donor nerves with various success but an ideal method has not been established. The purpose of this study was to analyze the results of nerve transfers in patients with traction injuries to the brachial plexus using the thoracodorsal and medial pectoral nerves as donors. Methods. This study included 40 patients with 25 procedures using the thoracodorsal nerve and 33 procedures using the medial pectoral nerve as donors for reinnervation of the musculocutaneous or axillary nerve. The results were analyzed according to the donor nerve, the age of the patient and the timing of surgery. Results. The total rate of recovery for elbow flexion was 94.1%, for shoulder abduction 89.3%, and for shoulder external rotation 64.3%. The corresponding rates of recovery using the thoracodorsal nerve were 100%, 93.7% and 68.7%, respectively. The ra...
Nerve transfer in brachial plexus traction injuries
Journal of Neurosurgery, 1992
✓ Brachial plexus palsy due to traction injury, especially spinal nerve-root avulsion, represents a severe handicap for the patient. Despite recent progress in diagnosis and microsurgical repair, the prognosis in such cases remains unfavorable. Nerve transfer is the only possibility for repair in cases of spinal nerve-root avulsion. This technique was analyzed in 37 patients with 64 reinnervation procedures of the musculocutaneous and/or axillary nerve using upper intercostal, spinal accessory, and regional nerves as donors. The most favorable results, with an 83.8% overall rate of useful functional recovery, were obtained in patients with upper brachial plexus palsy in which regional donor nerves, such as the medial pectoral, thoracodorsal, long thoracic, and subscapular nerves, had been used. The overall rates of recovery for the spinal accessory and upper intercostal nerves were 64.3% and 55.5%, respectively, which are significantly lower. The authors evaluate the results of nerv...
Current Concept in Adult Peripheral Nerve and Brachial Plexus Surgery
Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury
Peripheral nerve injuries and brachial plexus injuries are relatively frequent. Significance of these injuries lies in the fact that the majority of patients with these types of injuries constitute working population. Since these injuries may create disability, they present substantial socioeconomic problem nowadays. This article will present current state-of-the-art achievements of minimal invasive brachial plexus and peripheral nerve surgery. It is considered that the age of the patient, the mechanism of the injury, and the associated vascular and soft-tissue injuries are factors that primarily influence the extent of recovery of the injured nerve. The majority of patients are treated using classical open surgical approach. However, new minimally invasive open and endoscopic approaches are being developed in recent years—endoscopic carpal and cubital tunnel release, targeted minimally invasive approaches in brachial plexus surgery, endoscopic single-incision sural nerve harvesting...
Concepts of nerve regeneration and repair applied to brachial plexus reconstruction
Microsurgery, 2006
Brachial plexus injury is a serious condition that usually affects young adults. Progress in brachial plexus repair is intimately related to peripheral nerve surgery, and depends on clinical and experimental studies. We review the rat brachial plexus as an experimental model, together with its behavioral evaluation. Techniques to repair nerves, such as neurolysis, nerve coaptation, nerve grafting, nerve transfer, fascicular transfer, direct muscle neurotization, and end-to-side neurorraphy, are discussed in light of the authors' experimental studies. Intradural repair of the brachial plexus by graft implants into the spinal cord and motor rootlet transfer offer new possibilities in brachial plexus reconstruction. The clinical experience of intradural repair is presented. Surgical planning in root rupture or avulsion is proposed. In total avulsion, the authors are in favor of the reconstruction of thoraco-brachial and abdomino-antebrachial grasping, and on the transfer of the brachialis muscle to the wrist extensors if it is reinnervated. Surgical treatment of painful conditions and new drugs are also discussed. V V C 2006 Wiley-Liss, Inc. Microsurgery 26:230-244, 2006.
Nerve Root Grafting and Distal Nerve Transfers for C5-C6 Brachial Plexus Injuries
The Journal of Hand Surgery, 2010
Purpose To investigate the results of distal nerve transfer, with and without nerve root grafting, in C5-C6 palsy of the brachial plexus. Methods We prospectively studied 37 young adults with C5-C6 brachial plexus palsy who underwent surgical repair an average of 6.3 months after trauma. In 7 patients, no nerve roots were available for grafting, so reconstruction was achieved by transferring the accessory nerve to the suprascapular nerve, ulnar nerve fascicles to the biceps motor branch, and triceps branches to the axillary nerve (a triple nerve transfer). In 24 patients, C5 nerve root grafting to the anterior division of the upper trunk was combined with triple nerve transfer. In 6 patients, the C5ϩC6 nerve roots were grafted to the anterior and posterior divisions of the upper trunk, the accessory nerve was transferred to the suprascapular nerve, and ulnar nerve fascicles were connected to the biceps motor branch. The range of shoulder abduction/ external rotation recovery and elbow flexion strength were evaluated between 24 and 26 months after surgery. Results Both full abduction and full external rotation of the shoulder were restored in one of the 7 patients in the C5 and C6 nerve root avulsion group, in 14 of 21 patients who received C5 nerve root grafting, and in 2 of 6 patients in the C5ϩC6 nerve root graft group. The average percentages of elbow flexion strength recovery, relative to the normal, contralateral side, were 27%, 43%, and 59% for the C5-C6 nerve root avulsion, C5 nerve root graft, and C5ϩC6 nerve root graft groups, respectively. Conclusions We repaired C5-C6 brachial plexus palsies using a combination of strategies depending on the site of root injury (ie, intradural vs extradural). Patients with injuries that were able to be reconstructed with both root grafting and nerve transfers had the best function. These results suggest that the combined use of nerve transfers and root grafting may enhance outcomes in the reconstruction of C5-C6 injuries of the brachial plexus.
Techniques in Hand & Upper Extremity Surgery, 2007
Brachial plexus palsy caused by traction injury, especially spinal nerve-root avulsion, represents a severe handicap for the patient. Despite recent progress in diagnosis and microsurgical repair, the prognosis in such cases remains unfavorable. Neurotization is the only possibility for repair in cases of spinal nerve-root avulsion. Intercostal neurotization is a well-established technique in the treatment of some severe brachial plexus lesions in adults. In this article, we describe our experience and technique of intercostal nerve harvest for transfer in various neurotization strategies in posttraumatic brachial plexus reconstruction. Intercostal nerve harvest is a technique requiring meticulous technique and careful dissection along with proper hemostasis. It is also very important to preserve the serratus anterior muscle insertion and keep soft tissue stripping to a minimal. We do not osteotomize the ribs and believe that this adds to the morbidity and length of the procedure. Neurotization using intercostal nerves is a very viable procedure in avulsion injuries of the brachial plexus; however, there is some concern that in the presence of ipsilateral phrenic nerve palsy, it may lead to a significant compromise of respiratory function. In our experience, this is negligible with good long-term results.