Climate Change and Mutual Fund Voting on Environmental Proposals (original) (raw)
Related papers
Investor Rewards to Climate Responsibility: Evidence from the 2016 Climate Policy Shock
2018
Donald Trump's election and his nomination of Scott Pruitt, a climate skeptic, to lead the Environmental Protection Agency drastically downshifted expectations on US climate-change policy. We study firms' stock-price reactions and institutional investors' portfolio adjustments after these events. As expected, carbon-intensive firms benefited. Should not companies with responsible strategies on climate change have lost value, since they were paying for actions that were now less urgent? In fact, investors actually rewarded such firms. The premium the firms received resulted, at least in part, from the move into climate-responsible stocks by long-horizon investors presumably expecting a post-Trump rebound to green policy.
The state of climate change knowledge among UK and Australian institutional investors
Institutional investors are key actors in combating climate change. They are exposed to the risks and opportunities of climate change, and represent a large pool of capital that could help finance the trillions of dollars required to transition to a low carbon economy. Recognition of these issues within investment institutions appears to be increasing, but understanding climate change, and its associated investment implications, remains far from universal among investment professionals. This discussion paper outlines the current understanding of climate change in the investment markets in the UK and Australia, providing novel insights from 58 semi-structured interviews with a range of investment professions and a survey of 154 investors. The UK and Australia both have substantial and growing institutional investment systems, as well as increasing activism surrounding Responsible Investment (EY, 2015). Given this, more responsible management of these assets could, potentially, provide significant impetus in shifting capital towards lower carbon economies. The level of understanding of climate change, and how it relates to the investment system, was shown to vary hugely among participants in this research. The majority of participants focus more on climate risks than on the investment opportunities likely to arise from environmental change, although this divide was more noticeable in Australia than in the UK, partly due to the greater focus on regulatory risk in Australia. Another reason for this focus was the greater availability of investment products catering to climate risks, such as fossil-free indices and negative screening, compared to products that might be able to capture investment opportunities.
Sustainable Voting Behavior of Asset Managers: Do They Walk the Walk?
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2021
We investigate asset manager characteristics that influence ESG voting patterns using a decade of voting data with more than 20 million observations. Asset managers predominantly vote against social and environmental proposals. Especially, large and passive asset managers vote the least in favor of these proposals and despite the increased attention to sustainability integration, they hardly vote more in favor of these proposals than a decade ago. Moreover, signatories of the PRI do not vote more often in favor of environmental and social issues. Our results have important implications for investors striving for direct impact on the sustainability agenda of corporates.
Green and Good? The Investment Performance of US Environmental Mutual Funds
Journal of Business Ethics, 2011
Increased concern for the environment has increased the number of investment opportunities in mutual funds specialized in promoting responsible environmental attitudes. This paper examines the performance and risk sensitivities of US green mutual funds vis-à-vis their conventional peers. We also analyze and compare this performance relative to other Socially Responsible Investing (SRI) mutual funds. In order to implement this analysis, we apply a CAPM-based methodology and find that in the 1987-2009 period, environmental funds had lower performance than conventional funds with similar characteristics. However, if we focus on a more recent period (2001-2009), green funds achieved adjusted returns not significantly different from the rest of SRI and conventional mutual funds. JEL Classification: F30; G11; G15; G23; M14
Institutional investment portfolios are currently, and will increasingly be, affected by the risks and opportunities resulting from climate change. This paper contributes new empirical data from 58 in-depth interviews and a global investor survey to explore how climate change is being learnt socially and a socially within the institutional investment industry. This research seeks to identify ways in which the relatively novel concept of ‘stranded assets’ can be better disseminated to investment professionals. Importantly, both social and asocial learning can affect investment decisions, with some actors usefully providing information via both channels. Better learning, language and leadership within the institutional investment system could facilitate the dissemination of climate and stranded asset discourses among investors, but an imperative to communicate effectively rather than simply communicating more is noted. This paper should interest both investment professionals keen to learn more about the issue and academic researchers seeking to engage investors on these topics.
The Real Effects of Environmental Activist Investing
SSRN Electronic Journal
Contrary to the prediction of the classic adverse selection theory, a more informed trader receives better pricing relative to a less informed trader in over-the-counter financial markets. Dealers aggressively chase informed orders to better position their future quotes and avoid winner's curse in subsequent trades. On a multi-dealer platform, dealers' incentive of information chasing exactly offsets their fear of adverse selection. In a more general setting of OTC trading, information chasing can dominate adverse selection when dealers face differentially informed speculators, while adverse selection always dominates when dealers face differentially informed trades from a given speculator. These two predictions-which contrast sharply with each other-both find strong empirical support in the UK government bond market.
Measuring Investors’ Socially Responsible Preferences in Mutual Funds
Journal of Business Ethics, 2011
The aim of this study is to analyze investor behavior towards socially responsible mutual funds. The analysis is based on an experimental study where a sample of individuals takes investment decisions under different parameters of information about the investment alternatives and expected returns. In the experiment, each participant decides how to distribute an investment budget between two funds, returns on which are uncertain and change over time. Two treatments are conducted, each providing a different degree of information on the socially responsible (SR) character of one of the two investment alternatives. The results obtained suggest that although individuals' criteria for investment are essentially guided by returns and diversification, participants invest significantly more in a fund when they are explicitly informed about its SR nature. In particular, participants who declare being concerned about SR actually invest significantly more in the SR alternative. Furthermore, the level of SR faithfulness among a small group of investors is such that they invest the main share of their budget in the SR fund, even when the return differential is highly unfavorable. Providing clear information about the SR characteristics of an investment is crucial to help investors express their preferences.
What do financial markets reveal about global warming? Working paper series--09-13
2009
Global warming and its importance are controversial. While a variety of estimates exists of the likelihood of global warming and its economic cost, financial market information can provide an objective assessment of expected losses due to global warming. We consider a Merton-type asset pricing model in which asset prices are affected by the changes in investment opportunities caused by global warming. In this setting, global warming would imply a negative risk premium, with most assets loading negatively on the global warming factor, and financial assets in sectors that are more sensitive to global warming exhibiting stronger negative loadings. Utilizing a variant of Campbell and Diebold's (2005) weather forecasting model in conjunction with Lamont's (2001) and Vassalou's (2003) approach for extracting financial market "news", we empirically uncover the global warming factor. We find that the risk premium is indeed significantly negative and becoming more so ov...