Contracting Parties in the International Successive Transport (original) (raw)
Related papers
International Law on the Multimodal Carriage of Goods: Recent Trends and Perspectives
International Journal of Legal Studies ( IJOLS ), 2017
Multimodal transport is a systematic combination of different modes of transport such as railway, road and water transport, aviation, and other traditional transport modes that can take advantages of each individual modes and achieve higher efficiency. This paper presents an overview of legal issues concerning the multimodal carriage of goods. The authors focus on the evolution of the international law regulations of the freight transportation with particular reference to the issues connected to multimodal transport. The critical review of existing international conventions and their provisions pertaining to multimodal transportation and the “maritime plus” regime of the Rotterdam Rules is provided. In addition, the problems generated by the lack of uniform multimodal carriage law are highlighted by the authors and the perspectives recommendations concerning multimodal transportation of goods are proposed. These problems will be addressed by means of an analysis of the current legal...
This paper will address the general issues concerning the contract of multimodal transport , such as the notion, meaning, terminology, presentation and development, then the elements of the contract, contract forms, and the manner of concluding the contract. The legal defi nition of multimodal transport contract is given in the United Nations Convention for International Multimodal Transport of Goods, Article 1, and paragraph 3. This convention defi nes the contract for multimodal transport as follows: " The contract for multimodal transport is a contract whereby the multimodal transport operator undertakes , against payment of freight, to perform or to procure the performance of international multimodal transport. For the realization of multimodal transport activity, the participating parties will clearly defi ne their rights and obligations with the contract that they will conclude, for the multimodal transport of goods. The contract for multimodal transport of goods is a special category regulated by the provisions of the above-mentioned Convention , but in certain cases the provisions of national laws, which regulate legal relations between the operator of multimodal transport (MTO) and third parties that he has engaged in the transport process, are applied. Law on Obligational Relationships as lex gene-ralis does not contain special provisions that regulate the multimodal transport contract, but the provisions of this law, regulating the contracts in general and the freight contracts in particular, apply to this contract.
The Harmonization of Liability Regimes Concerning Loss of Goods During Multimodal Transport
2012
The terms “multimodal transport”, “combined transport”, “intermodal transport” are all used in the context of cargo movement from origin to destination. These terms have similar (although not the same) meaning, i.e. carriage of goods by more than one mode of transport through single fright contract. Containers enable transport of utilised cargo from its origin to its final destination, with a high level of efficiency and at least possible risk. Unfortunately, technical developments of multimodal carriage of goods are not supported by adequate legal framework. Despite various attempts that have been made in the past, there is no mandatory international convention governing multimodal carriage. The 1980 Multimodal Convention drawn by the UN has not come into force and is not likely to do so. All applicable international conventions are unimodal, i.e. applicable (in principle) only to specific mode of transport (sea, road, rail, air, inland waterways). Provisions contained in each of t...
2018
Initially, carriage of goods used to take place only through sea voyage. However, during the era of containerization multimodal transport arrangements has become very important and the parties of the international contracts are preferring multimodal contracts over traditional international contracts such as F.O.B. and C.I.F. contracts. This article aims at having an in-depth look on the good and bad sides of using multimodal transport arrangements in carriage of goods so that the readers can have a proper idea of the rules relating to this area. In order to do so the basic difference between contract of carriage and multimodal transport has been showed. After that, the main advantages and disadvantages of using multimodal transport have been intensively scrutinized. Despite providing numerous benefits to the parties involved in international contract, the problem regarding multimodal transport system is that it has no single convention and different legs (e.g. sea leg, road leg) are governed by different rules. Therefore, this article makes a proper research and analysis on the conventions relating to multimodal contract such as The Hague Rules, Hague-Visby Rules, Hamburg Rules and CMR. Besides, ICC Rules for Multimodal Transport Documents 1992 has also been critically discussed. Rotterdam Rules is the only rule which covers all the modes of transport in multimodal contract. Therefore, to bring out the positive and negative aspects of multimodal contract, a comprehensive analysis of this convention has been made.
Comparative Analysis Of The Contracts For Maritime Transport Services. Chain Of Charter Parties
Pedagogika-Pedagogy, 2021
A basic principle in Law is the freedom of contract. Particularly, in Private Shipping Law, contractual parties may agree on all lawful terms and conditions which are most appropriate for the performance of the carriage. During the years of maritime trade practice, different types of contracts has been created, as well as systems of Chain Charter Parities have been adopted, through all of which the relations between maritime traders were settled. All this has contributed to maritime commercial practices for the carriage to be carried out not only by the shipowners, but also by other maritime traders with the appropriate authority and competence.
Studia Iuridica Toruniensia
The turn of the 20 th and 21 st centuries has been the period of increasing importance of multimodal transport in commercial relations. This transport is characterized by using at least two different modes under the contract of carriage of cargo concluded between different countries 1. The development of this mode of transport entails the emergence of numerous problems, not only of technical, but also of legal nature. These problems include, in particular, the decision on the liability of the carrier in individual modes of transport, where international unimodal conventions are applicable. The most important of them are such conventions as the CMR Convention for the Carriage of Goods by Road 2 , COTIF-CIM Convention for the Carriage of Goods
CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL, 2019
The article demonstrates through an analysis of the limitations on choice of forum or arbitration agreements following the declaration of invalidity of a choice of law clause included in a charter party and/or a bill of lading (B/L) by a judge. It is equally difficult enforcing a jurisdiction or arbitration clause included in a B/L if the parties are not clearly defined in the contract for the carrige of goods by sea. The article delivers some conclusions and suggests the approach to be taken by maritime contracting parties to overcome any feasible invalidity of a choice of forum or arbitration agreement based on the choice of law by European Member (EU) States' courts. Keywords: Jurisdiction and arbitration agreements, choice of law clauses, contracts for the carriage of goods by sea, charter party, bill of lading, anti-suit injunctions, actions in contract, actions in tort, actions in bailment, Demise Clause, Identity of the Carrier Clause.