Archaeology and the Public in the 21st Century: The View from Israel_by Ann E. Killebrew_2004 (original) (raw)
Related papers
2001: Excavating to excess? Implications of the last decade of archaeology in Israel
Journal of Mediterranean archaeology, 2001
An appeal made by two archaeologists, to minimalize what is seen as the highlight of our profession, may seem odd at first; yet the real oddity is that such an appeal has not been made before. We hasten to state that, although we work in the Israel Antiquities Authority and Haifa University, the opinion expressed here is entirely our own, and does not reflect the policy of these institutions. Moreover, all the data we are using in this paper are published and available to the general public. The nature of these data determines the geographic area under discussion (modern Israel) and, while our fields of research (the Bronze and Iron Ages) naturally offer most of the examples, the conclusions are relevant to other areas and periods as well. If there is criticism in this paper, we do not exempt ourselves from it: we come not to criticize, but to call for a change.
Managing Archaeology in Dynamic Urban Centres, in: Belford, P. and Bouwmeester,J. (eds), Leiden: Sidestone Press, 2020
This article details the development of salvage and preventative archaeology in Israel, since the mandatory period until today. Grounded in the framework of the pre-state legal instruments, and still set in an ethos where archaeological and cultural heritage are viewed as national, rather than commercial interests, Israeli archaeology is mostly conducted by archaeologists belonging to the statutory Israel Antiquities Authority. At the same time, developers have been required to pay, either in total or partially, for the ‘clearance’ of archaeological remnants. This has led to the limited entry of private contract archaeology, though restricted by the requirement for academic sponsorship. The second part of the paper details systems of archaeological management in urban settings, utilised as a feature of preventative archaeology, to assimilate archaeological resources in urban planning. The primary tool introduced was the integration of ancient sites in master plans, to ensure that archaeology becomes community based and to guarantee an unexcavated archaeological reserve for the future. Keywords: Israel, Salvage Excavation, Contract Archaeology, Archaeological Management, Antiquities Law, Urban Archaeology, Jerusalem.
Israeli Archaeology in Jerusalem: National Heritage, Identity, and Partiality
Jerusalem Art History Journal, 2014
Through investigations of the aims and consequences of archaeology in the city and display of the rationale and process of my creation project, it will be exposed in the following pages that my artwork, titled Convergence (2013), is a response to an important issue in contemporary Jerusalem, namely the nationalist approach that is characteristic of – yet not exclusive to – Israeli archaeology, which overlooks the layered past of Jerusalem, privileging one history of the city over another, and which creates contentious issues within the discipline and between the Israeli/Jewish and the Palestinian communities. The role of Palestinians in this sphere will also be addressed. It must be acknowledged, however, that although the main concern of this paper is Israeli archaeology, there has hardly been any neutral or purely scienti c archaeology in Jerusalem at any time from any religious group.