THE HISTORICAL DEVELOPMENT OF JAPANESE INVESTMENT IN MALAYSIA 1981-1990 (original) (raw)
Related papers
Perspectives on Japanese Investment, Employment and Management in Australia
Asia Pacific Economic Papers, 1999
In the postwar period Japanese foreign direct investment in Australia has played a key role in strengthening trading links between the two countries and influencing the industrial structure of Australia. This paper surveys the pattern and intensity of Japanese investment in the 1990s as well as the motivations of Japanese investors-both in Australia and the rest of the world. It assesses the organisational and industrial distribution of investment, employment creation, and the conduct of industrial relations by Japanese firms in Australia, in a range of industries. The role of Japanese management and differences in the conduct of industrial relations in Japanese workplaces in Australia are considered in comparative perspective. The paper surveys the characteristics and outward orientation of these firms, particularly in the automotive industry-one of the largest areas of Japanese investment and employment in Australia. Overall, Japanese subsidiaries in Australia are considered to have relatively similar employment and industrial relations practices as other firms. Pacific Economic Papers mineral resources, such as coal and iron ore, to the establishment of a marketing network, and to the relocation of labour-intensive manufacturing industries (Komiya and Wakasugi 1990). By 1970 direct investment was only significant in the mining, lumber and pulp, and textiles industries. A decade later, the chemicals, steel, and electrical equipment industries had become active investors. FDI accounted for over 1 per cent of industry GDP, but half of the investment came from the manufacturing industry. The revision of the Foreign Exchange Law in 1980 removed an administrative obstacle to investment, since investors no longer required the prior approval of the Ministry of Finance, but were merely required to notify the Ministry of intended investment. The expansion of Japanese FDI in the 1970s was dwarfed by what was to follow, as both manufacturing and non-manufacturing industries increased their investment abroad, especially to the United States and East Asia. In the second half of the 1980s, following the sharp appreciation in the yen after the Plaza Accord, outflows grew very quickly.
Determinants of Japanese direct investments in selected BIMP-EAGA countries
2007
This paper uses panel data analysis to identify how Japanese multinational corporations (MNCs) allocate their investments in the selected BIMP-EAGA countries (i.e. Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines). The paper hypothesizes that the following six elements would influence the inflow of Japanese Direct Investments (JDI) into the area: country's market size, growth rate of market size, per capita income, trade deficit, inflation rates and political condition. The main findings from the panel data analysis are that there is a significant relationship between Japanese direct investments and political condition in the recipient countries. The inflows of Japanese investment tend to decrease as the political risk increases. It means that Japanese MNCs tend to allocate more investments into the countries with better political condition.
The Extent and History of Foreign Direct Investment in Japan
SSRN Electronic Journal, 2000
The past few decades have seen a significant rise in foreign direct investment (FDI) worldwide. While Japanese companies have actively contributed to this trend, FDI in Japan continues to be much lower than in other countries. This paper explores the history of both outward and inward FDI in Japan, looking in particular at the reasons for the low levels of inward FDI. New calculations for this paper -based on data from the Establishment and Enterprise Census -show that foreign firms' role in the Japanese economy may be substantially larger than the most frequently cited published statistics suggest. In some industries (motor vehicles and electrical machinery in particular), inward FDI penetration, as measured by the share of employment accounted for by foreign affiliates, in Japan in fact is on par with the United States. However, a large number of "sanctuaries" with almost no foreign involvement remain, so that FDI penetration overall is still very low. While to some extent, this can be explained by Japan's relatively isolated geographic location, historical factors play an important role. Throughout the centuries and until quite recently, Japan's rulers have viewed foreign involvement in the economy as a threat and consequently erected various barriers to FDI, which are discussed in detail.
DETERMINANTS OF JAPANESE DIRECT INVESTMENT IN SELECTED BIMP-EAGA COUNTRIES
This paper uses panel data analysis to identify how Japanese multinational corporations (MNCs) allocate their investments in the selected BIMP-EAGA countries (i.e. Malaysia, Indonesia and the Philippines). The paper hypothesizes that the following six elements would influence the inflow of Japanese Direct Investments (JDI) into the area: country's market size, growth rate of market size, per capita income, trade deficit, inflation rates and political condition. The main findings from the panel data analysis are that there is a significant relationship between Japanese direct investments and political condition in the recipient countries. The inflows of Japanese investment tend to decrease as the political risk increases. It means that Japanese MNCs tend to allocate more investments into the countries with better political condition.
Cogent Social Sciences, 2021
Malaysia had looked to Japan to search for a sustainable and efficient development model under the Look East Policy (LEP) initiative launched in 1982 by former Prime Minister Tun Dr Mahathir Mohamad. At the time, this ideal formula, intended for the betterment of the Malaysian economy, was designed to incorporate the Japanese attitude to work, their moral values, progressive norms, and work ethics. Since then, more than 15,000 Malaysians expatriated to Japan due to this very purpose, and bilateral relations between them have blossomed. In this paper, the LEP is revisited, and Japan-Malaysia relations will be analysed to understand the change and continuity aspects of this policy in the past 35 years. Furthermore, this paper will also seek to forecast the challenges Japanese and Malaysian institutions may face in establishing cooperation under the second phase of this policy after 35 years of success. Besides, exploring a new paradigm for Japan and Malaysia’s relations as proposed by the former Prime Minister, Mohd Najib Tun Abdul Razak.
Japan and the Philippines' Lost Decade: Foreign Direct Investments and International Relations
The 1980s witnessed the economic transformation of many Southeast Asian economies but for the Philippines they were a lost decade in terms of economic growth. Arguably, external finance played a major differential role especially after the 1985 Plaza Accord when vast sums of foreign direct investments (FDI) flowed to Southeast Asia. In the case of the Philippines, external finance had been critical; to a large extent, her economic performance depended on funds from abroad. This dependence raises the importance of international relations to the country’s economic growth and sustenance. This study explores how international relations have affected financial flows, including Japanese FDI, to the Philippines during the1980s. It examines the period 1979-83 as a decisive period for the later distribution pattern of FDI flows. The argument is that FDI avoided the Philippines because 1) the domestic investment climate under the Marcos regime increasingly became inhospitable since 1979 and 2) Japan’s foreign policy and relations with other countries created a basis for Japanese FDI locational preferences later in the decade. The study revisits the 1983 balance-of-payments (BOP) crisis, which was a critical juncture in Philippine economic performance of the 1980s, if not of her long-term performance record. It proposes that the crisis represented the loss of international support to the Marcos regime. This loss of support produced serious complications that later resulted in the steep decline of the Philippine economy. The periods surrounding the 1983 crisis reflected conditions that made the country less attractive to FDI. Japan’s active involvement in Southeast Asia also became notable in the early 1980s. Japan’s foreign policy has been shaped by economic security considerations, which around 1980 included the economic and political stability of Southeast Asian countries. Particularly, world and regional events raised the strategic importance of countries along the Malacca Straits. The comprehensive security policy adopted meant that the “trilogy” of aid, trade, and FDI be stepped up in favour of these countries. Initial investments placed made these countries more attractive to Japanese FDI, particularly after the 1985 Plaza Accord.
Japan's response to globalization: learning from Japanese direct investment
unescap.org
T he global production activities of transnational corporations (TNCs) that are conducted via foreign direct investment (FDI) constitute one important dimension of economic globalization. Therefore, the response of a country towards TNC activity and FDI represents a key component of a country's strategy towards harnessing globalization for its national development. This article analyses the approach of Malaysia and Japan towards the globalization of production and FDI. Second, it will also assess whether the policies that have been utilized by Japan can be used or adapted for Malaysia and other developing countries.