Conceptualizing a Foundation to Lead a School–University Research Partnership (original) (raw)
Related papers
School-university partnerships, 2024
Purpose-Many researchers partner with schools but may be unfamiliar with practices for initiating contact and sustaining relationships with school leaders. Partnering with schools requires significant effort from the researcher to nurture communication and trust. This can pose challenges for researchers who are new to the field, have relocated to a new university or need to rebuild relationships due to transitions in school staffing. Design/methodology/approach-In this mixed-methods study, we interviewed and surveyed school and district leaders in Delaware to learn how researchers can best communicate and form relationships with schools and districts. Findings-We found no singular best method exists to initiate contact with schools and districts. Rather, researchers should consider the unique needs of the local context. Leaders' decision to participate in research was most influenced by their own interest in the research topic, alignment with schools' needs and researchers' willingness to build a relationship with the local education agency. Originality/value-Despite broad acknowledgment about the importance of school-university partnerships, few studies directly engage educators in discussing their goals, preferences and needs when working with researchers. We sought to formalize an understanding of best practices researchers can consider when initiating contact and building relationships with schools, directly from the perspective of school and district leaders. Developing these understandings from practitioners ensures the information authentically represents the perspectives of those who researchers seek to connect with, rather than assumptions of the researcher.
Educational Action Research
The aim of this study is to explore what happened – and why – in a collaboration between ourselves as researchers and school leaders from two different schools in Sweden. The theory of practice architectures is used to frame the study. The goal of the collaboration was to enhance the scientific foundation of school practices, which motivated the use of action research as the methodological approach for designing the collaboration. The results allow us to propose a number of critical aspects to take into consideration when establishing a collaboration between researchers and school leaders. The first aspect concerns aiming for co-ownership and an equivalent collaboration. These involve trustful and respectful relations, empowering individuals in their professional roles. The second aspect is linked to attention to local infrastructures and the importance of organisational settings that facilitate a holistic approach and a shared understanding of the aims of both the research and the collaboration. The third and final aspect is related to school leaders’ legitimacy to organise researchbased school improvements. School leaders are responsible for educational quality in schools, and this makes them best suited for leading school improvements. However, theoretical frameworks and methods introduced by researchers can support the ambition to enhance the scientific foundation of school practices. We advocate the development of practices inhabited by school practitioners and school researchers within the educational complex. In addition, we promote the creation of healthy environments in the form of arrangements that create spaces where equivalent collaborations, shared responsibility and co-ownership may grow.
Research practice partnerships and school improvement
LiberiaUniversitaria, 2020
As the recent PISA scores have indicated [1], student performance around the world has hit an asymptote. Some countries' performance are going down and some countries failing to make any progress, but overall, there is not significant improvement. After 30 years of education reform in the United States, this pattern repeats itself in urban, suburban, and rural settings. Coleman (2018) made the argument that in order to improve outcomes for all of our children, we need to take a more systemic approach to school improvement that includes cooperation among the adult community across the various ecologies in which a child grows. The purpose of this essay is to is to build on the work of the scholars in the field of research practice partnerships [2,3,4] to advocate for the use of cooperative approach between scholars and practitioners as an important factor in developing cultures of continual improvement within school, produce scholarship that improves the practice of education, and will lead to sustainable growth in student performance.
1992
This paper describes a collaborative action research project conducted by a university researcher and a group of elementary school teachers. It examines the role the researcher plays when educational change is initiated by practitioners and the nature of the relationship that develops between researcher and practitioners throughout the change process. The document focuses on the researcher as a reflective coach, on themes emerging from and inherent to university/school relationships, and on the process of challenging traditional myths (beliefs) and metaphors associated with educational research and educational researchers. The discussion centers on the myth of the researcher as expert and the ivory tower metaphor. Results suggest that reform and change may begin when university researchers, principals, and teachers form relationships that transcend traditional myths and metaphors of educational research. Such relationships are empowering and enable all members of a collaborative group to reflect critically on practices as teacher educator, principal, or teacher. Critical reflection may lead to change beginning with self-reflection, constructs of reality, and practices as educators. (Contains 20 references.) (LL)
Teachers as Researchers: The impact of a partnership innovation Introduction
Over the last several decades the professional context within schools has changed (Hargreaves and Fullan 2012 ) compelling employers to provide professional learning and development programs that assist the school workforce to adjust accordingly . This paper provides a summary of an evaluation study that investigated the impact an innovative professional learning program had on teachers, the workplace and the state education system.
Action research facilitated by university-school collaboration
ELT Journal, 2014
While Action Research (AR) is promoted as a powerful route for teachers' professional development, different contextual challenges may arise during the process; teachers may be helped to overcome these challenges with the guidance of external facilitators. Drawing on data from interviews and the teachers' AR reports, this article explores how two EFL teachers conducted AR by participating in a university-school collaborative project. Findings of the study show that with the scaffolding provided by university researchers, the teachers changed their conceptions about research and coped with different contextual constraints in their AR, leading to professional learning and development. This study concludes with some implications about how AR can be used to promote teachers' continuing professional development. In many EFL contexts where educational systems require language teachers to enhance their professional development, Action Research (AR) is widely perceived as a viable approach to helping teachers develop their teaching practice and promote their professional competency (Atay 2008; Gao, Barkhuizen, and Chow 2011). In AR, 'action' refers to intervention in an existing practice in particular social contexts (for example classroom and school) to bring about improvement and change, whereas 'research' involves the systematic observation and analysis of the change that occurs as a result (Burns 1999, 2009). In language teaching, previous research has reported that teachers often lack knowledge of what AR is and how it can be implemented (Rainey 2000), while the traditional conception of research as 'an academic, large scale, statistical and technically difficult activity' (Borg 2010: 409) discourages them from conducting classroom research. In some AR projects, an individualistic approach is adopted with little contact with others outside of the classroom (Burns 2009). Although such an approach can help teachers reflect on and improve their teaching practice, they may encounter a range of challenges, such as lack of research support and professional isolation (Wallace 1998; Gao et al. op.cit.) Therefore, in recent years, university-school partnerships have been proposed as an effective means of enhancing teachers' professional development through AR within a systematic network of mutual learning and support (Day and Hadfield 2004).
Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: The State of the Field
2021
Research-practice partnerships (RPPs) are an important part of the educational ecosystem that connects research, policy, practice, and community work in the United States. They are a prime example of how long-term collaborative approaches to research can address persistent challenges and systemic inequities in our schools and communities.Research-Practice Partnerships in Education: The State of the Field expands on the 2013 white paper Research-Practice Partnerships: A Strategy for Leveraging Research for Educational Improvement in School Districts by scanning the current landscape of partnerships, identifying points of variation, and outlining shared principles
Supporting action research/learning in schools through academic partnerships
This paper details a study tracking three academics as they worked as partners to 11 schools undertaking the NSW Quality Teaching Action Learning (QTAL) program through a school based action research/learning approach aimed at improving the quality of teaching and learning. Action research/learning is a popular strategy used by teachers and schools to develop insights and understandings to make their work more professional and improve their teaching. It has the potential to empower teachers and lead to changes in teaching practice and school reform . Throughout the project the academic partners conducted their own action research study as a means of recording this process from both their and the teachers' perspective with the aim of analysing the impact of their role on the evolution, progress and outcomes of the projects. This paper uses data collected from a questionnaire which was administered to teachers pre and post projects and personal reflective journals completed by the three academic partners throughout the duration of the projects. Results indicated the outcomes for the academics were collaborative skills, self efficacy and a sense of achievement through the relationships and research skills developed in the school-based settings and with colleagues. The schools cited specialist knowledge, strategies and resources together with the leadership provided by the academic partners as vital to the success of the school projects and professional development achieved. Limitations encountered will also be discussed.
Leaders’ views on the values of school-based research: contemporary themes and issues
Professional Development in Education
In 2004, McLaughlin, Black-Hawkins and McIntyre published a literature review that explored the ways in which individual teachers, whole schools and groups of networked schools were engaging in practitioner research and enquiry. In the light of significant changes to the education landscape, the empirical research in this paper gives an account of engagements with 25 school leaders to explore what schools are doing in the area of practitioner 'research' or 'enquiry' today. Although teachers in schools may both use research and generate findings,: this research was particularly concerned with the generation of professional knowledge through research and enquiry in schools in England today. A sample of school leaders was interviewed to establish their current approach. Findings include questions about the effects on teachers' dissatisfaction in the face of a revealed gap between actuality and idealism, the possible evolution of a new teacher-educator population and the effects on those working in Higher Education as they address the shifting needs of 21 st Century teacher education. As school-based research continues as a factor, this represents a timely scoping of the thinking of school senior leaders and considers the implications of this developing practice.
Building Research Collaboratives Among Schools and Universities: Lessons From the Field
Mind, Brain, and Education, 2009
In a previous issue of Mind, Brain, and Education , Hinton and Fischer (2008) argue that educational research needs to be grounded in the lived realities of school life. They advocate for research schools as a venue for accomplishing this. The Center for the Study of Boys ' and Girls ' Lives represents an alternative model -a research collaborative among independent schools and university-based scholars. This article describes the Center ' s experience with democratic, participatory action research. It discusses major roadblocks encountered doing such work, including diffi culties selecting research topics collaboratively, epistemological differences in methods and design, the scarcity of time, and resistance to results when they challenge gender stereotypes or the status quo or involve student researchers. The article concludes with strategies for overcoming these roadblocks, including clearer, upfront negotiations with schools and a compact that specifi es roles and responsibilities for both school and Center personnel.