How Individual Self-Regulation Affects Group Regulation and Performance (original) (raw)

Abstract

This study explored the relationship between individual self-regulated learning (SRL), socially shared regulation of learning (SSRL), and group performance plus the effect of an intervention promoting SSRL. We hypothesized that SRL would influence SSRL and group performance as groups with high SRL students will be better regulated and that the intervention would promote SSRL over time. The results revealed a significant relationship between SRL and SSRL, but no significant effects of the intervention on group performance. The limitations of the intervention are discussed and form the basis for future design of environments to promote SSRL. The main conclusion is that SRL is an important predictor of SSRL and should be considered when designing small group activities and their environments.

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (48)

  1. Boekaerts, M. (2011). Emotions, emotion regulation, and self-regulation of learn- ing.
  2. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 408-425). New York, NY: Routledge.
  3. Cellar, D., Stuhlmacher, A., Young, S., Fisher, D., Adair, C., Haynes, S., . . . Riester, D. (2011). Trait goal orientation, self-regulation, and performance: A meta- analysis. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26, 467-483. doi:10.1007/s10869- 010-9201-6
  4. DiDonato, N. C. (2013). Effective self-and co-regulation in collaborative learning groups: An analysis of how students regulate problem solving of authentic interdis- ciplinary tasks. Instructional Science, 41, 25-47. doi:10.1007/s11251-012-9206-9
  5. Dignath, C., & Büttner, G. (2008). Components of fostering self-regulated learning among students: A meta-analysis on intervention studies at primary and second- ary school level. Metacognition and Learning, 3, 231-264. doi:10.1007/s11409- 008-9029-x
  6. Dillenbourg, P., Järvelä, S., & Fischer, F. (2009). The evolution of research on com- puter-supported collaborative learning. In N. Balacheff, S. Ludvigsen, T. Jong, A. Lazonder & S. Barnes (Eds.), Technology-enhanced learning (pp. 3-19). Rotterdam, The Netherlands: Springer.
  7. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), Mechanisms of insight (pp. 365-395). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  8. Field, A. (2013). Multilevel linear models. In Discovering statistics using SPSS (4th ed., pp. 814-867). London, England: Sage.
  9. Finkelman, J., Hudesman, J., Flugman, B., & Crosby, S. (2014). An enhanced forma- tive assessment and self-regulated learning program: From the classroom to the workplace. Journal of Psychiatry Behavioral Sciences, 1(1), 1-8.
  10. Fransen, J., Weinberger, A., & Kirschner, P. (2013). Team effectiveness and team development in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 9-24. doi:10.1080/ 00461520.2012.747947
  11. Grau, V., & Whitebread, D. (2012). Self and social regulation of learning dur- ing collaborative activities in the classroom: The interplay of individual and group cognition. Learning and Instruction, 22, 401-412. doi:10.1016/j.learnin- struc.2012.03.003
  12. Hadwin, A. F., Järvelä, S., & Miller, M. (2011). Self-regulated, co-regulated, and socially shared regulation of learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 65-84). New York, NY: Routledge.
  13. Hurme, T. R., Palonen, T., & Järvelä, S. (2006). Metacognition in joint discussions: An analysis of the patterns of interaction and the metacognitive content of the networked discussions in mathematics. Metacognition and Learning, 1, 181-200. doi:10.1007/s11409-006-9792-5
  14. Hutchins, E. (1991). The social organization of distributed cognition. In L. B. Resnick, J. M. Levine & S. D. Teasley (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition (pp. 283-307). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  15. Hutchins, E. (1995). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  16. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., & Lehtinen, E. (2004). Socially-shared metacognition in peer learning? Hellenic Journal of Psychology, 1(2), 147-178.
  17. Iiskala, T., Vauras, M., Lehtinen, E., & Salonen, P. (2011). Socially shared metacognition of dyads of pupils in collaborative mathematical problem- solving processes. Learning and Instruction, 21, 379-393. doi:10.1016/j.learn- instruc.2010.05.002
  18. Janssen, J., Cress, U., Erkens, G., & Kirschner, P. (2013). Multilevel analysis for the analysis of collaborative learning. In C. E. Hmelo-Silver, C. A. Chinn, C. Chan & A. M. O'Donnell (Eds.), The international handbook of collaborative learning (pp. 41-56). New York, NY: Routledge.
  19. Janssen, J., Erkens, G., Kirschner, P. A., & Kanselaar, G. (2012). Task-related and social regulation during online collaborative learning. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 25-43. doi:10.1007/s11409-010-9061-5
  20. Järvelä, S., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). New frontiers: Regulating learning in CSCL. Educational Psychologist, 48, 25-39. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.748006
  21. Järvelä, S., Järvenoja, H., Malmberg, J., & Hadwin, A. F. (2013). Exploring socially- shared regulation in the context of collaboration. Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology, 12, 267-286. doi:10.1891/1945-8959.12.3.267
  22. Järvelä, S., Kirschner, P., Panadero, E., Malmberg, J., Phielix, C., Jaspers, J., . . . Järvenoja, H. (2015). Enhancing socially shared regulation in collaborative learning groups: Designing for CSCL regulation tools. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63, 125-142. doi:10.1007/s11423-014-9358-1
  23. Järvenoja, H., & Järvelä, S. (2009). Emotion control in collaborative learning situ- ations: Do students regulate emotions evoked by social challenges. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 463-481. doi:10.1348/0007099 09x402811
  24. Järvenoja, H., Volet, S., & Järvelä, S. (2012). Regulation of emotions in socially chal- lenging learning situations: An instrument to measure the adaptive and social nature of the regulation process. Educational Psychology, 33, 31-58. doi:10.1080/ 01443410.2012.742334
  25. Jaspers, J., Broeken, M., & Erkens, G. (2004). Virtual Collaborative Research Institute (VCRI) (Version 2.0). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Onderwijskunde Utrecht, Interuniversity Centre for Educational Research/Institute for Social Sciences Research.
  26. Kirschner, P. A., Kreijns, K., Phielix, C., & Fransen, J. (2015). Awareness of cogni- tive and social behaviour in a CSCL environment. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 31, 59-77. doi:10.1111/jcal.12084
  27. Müller, A., Herbig, B., & Petrovic, K. (2009). The explication of implicit team knowl- edge and its supporting effect on team processes and technical innovations: An action regulation perspective on team reflexivity. Small Group Research, 40, 28-51. doi:10.1177/1046496408326574
  28. Panadero, E., & Alonso-Tapia, J. (2014). How do students self-regulate? Review of Zimmerman's cyclical model of self-regulated learning. Anales de Psicologia, 30, 450-462. doi:10.6018/analesps.30.2.167221
  29. Panadero, E., Alonso-Tapia, J., & Huertas, J. A. (2012). Rubrics and self-assessment scripts effects on self-regulation, learning and self-efficacy in secondary edu- cation. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 806-813. doi:10.1016/j.lin- dif.2012.04.007
  30. Panadero, E., & Järvelä, S. (2015). Socially shared regulation of learning: A review. European Psychologist. Advance online publication. doi:10.1027/1016-9040/ a000226
  31. Panadero, E., & Romero, M. (2014). To rubric or not to rubric? The effects of self- assessment on self-regulation, performance and self-efficacy. Assessment in Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 21, 133-148. doi:10.1080/09695 94X.2013.877872
  32. Phielix, C. (2012). Enhancing collaboration through assessment & reflection (Doctoral thesis). Utrecht, The Netherlands: Utrecht University. Retrieved from http://dspace.library.uu.nl/bitstream/handle/1874/255570/phielix.pdf?sequence
  33. Phielix, C., Prins, F. J., Kirschner, P. A., Erkens, G., & Jaspers, J. (2011). Group awareness of social and cognitive performance in a CSCL environment: Effects of a peer feedback and reflection tool. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1087- 1102. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.06.024
  34. Pintrich, P. R., Smith, D. A. F., Garcia, T., & Mckeachie, W. J. (1993). Reliability and predictive validity of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire (MSLQ). Educational and Psychological Measurement, 53, 801-813. doi:10.1177/0013164493053003024
  35. Rogat, T. K., & Adams-Wiggins, K. R. (2014). Other-regulation in collaborative groups: Implications for regulation quality. Instructional Science, 42, 879-904. doi:10.1007/s11251-014-9322-9
  36. Rogat, T. K., & Linnenbrink-Garcia, L. (2011). Socially shared regulation in col- laborative groups: An analysis of the interplay between quality of social regula- tion and group processes. Cognition and Instruction, 29, 375-415. doi:10.1080/ 07370008.2011.607930
  37. Saab, N. (2012). Team regulation, regulation of social activities or co-regulation: Different labels for effective regulation of learning in CSCL. Metacognition and Learning, 7, 1-6. doi:10.1007/s11409-011-9085-5
  38. Schoor, C., & Bannert, M. (2012). Exploring regulatory processes during a computer- supported collaborative learning task using process mining. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1321-1331. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2012.02.016
  39. Shin, Y. (2014). Positive group affect and team creativity: Mediation of team reflexivity and promotion focus. Small Group Research, 45, 337-364. doi:10.1177/1046496414533618
  40. Strijbos, J. W., Martens, R. L., Jochems, W. M. G., & Broers, N. J. (2004). The effect of functional roles on group efficiency: Using multilevel modeling and content analysis to investigate computer-supported collaboration in small groups. Small Group Research, 35, 195-229. doi:10.1177/1046496403260843
  41. Van den Bossche, P., Gijselaers, W. H., Segers, M., & Kirschner, P. A. (2006). Social and cognitive factors driving teamwork in collaborative learning environments. Small Group Research, 37, 490-521. doi:10.1177/1046496406292938
  42. Volet, S., Summers, M., & Thurman, J. (2009). High-level co-regulation in collab- orative learning: How does it emerge and how is it sustained? Learning and Instruction, 19, 128-143. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.03.001
  43. Volet, S., Vauras, M., & Salonen, P. (2009). Self-and social regulation in learn- ing contexts: An integrative perspective. Educational Psychologist, 44, 215-226. doi:10.1080/00461520903213584
  44. Winne, P. H., Nesbit, J. C., Kumar, V. S., Hadwin, A. F., Lajoie, S., Azevedo, R., & Perry, N. E. (2006). Supporting self-regulated learning with gStudy software: The Learning Kit Project. Technology, Instruction, Cognition and Learning, 3, 105-113.
  45. Wolters, C. A., & Benzon, M. B. (2013). Assessing and predicting college students' use of strategies for the self-regulation of motivation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 81, 199-221. doi:10.1080/00220973.2012.699901
  46. Zimmerman, B. J., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Comparing students' self-discipline and self-regulation measures and their prediction of academic achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 39, 145-155. doi:10.1016/j.ced- psych.2014.03.004
  47. Zimmerman, B. J., & Moylan, A. R. (2009). Self-regulation: Where metacogni- tion and motivation intersect. In D. J. Hacker, J. Dunlosky & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), Handbook of metacognition in education (pp. 299-315). New York, NY: Routledge.
  48. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2011). Self-regulated learning and performance. An introduction and an overview. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation of learning and performance (pp. 1-12). New York, NY: Routledge.