Characterizing Organizational Lifecycle through Strategic and Structural Flexibility: Insights from MSMEs in Mexico (original) (raw)
Related papers
Examining Structural Flexibility Factors in SMEs: A Mixed Methods Study in Mexico
Electronic Journal of Research Business Methods, 2019
The purpose of this article is to demonstrate the utility of a mixed methods approach in the examination of one of the best-known success factors of small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs): their structural flexibility (SF), and how this is related to their organisational life cycle (OLC). Previous research has proposed five factors to explain SF in large and medium-sized organisations. By adopting an explanatory sequential design, this study demonstrates why a mono-method approach is insufficient to explain this model when put into operation in SMEs. It also highlights a key aspect of mixed methods research: the integration challenge, which is illustrated with joint displays and using a weaving approach. In the first quantitative phase, data from 257 SMEs were collected, classified according to their OLC stage, and examined with exploratory factor analysis (EFA) and a two-step cluster analysis. The EFA revealed five factors, one of which, called "decision-making", presented unexpected statistical behaviour and an unclear explanation, indicating a contrasting approach was necessary for better results explanation. It was not until the qualitative phase that we realised this aspect would be better named "centralisation in decision-making". This term is associated with growing and declining SMEs, and it may constrain their flexibility and limit their growth. Additionally, a new theme emerged in this phase: "innovation", which had not been associated with the SF before. This paper provides evidence that the combined use of quantitative and qualitative approaches offers the possibility of exploring new dimensions and can lead to a more comprehensive understanding of the phenomenon in a way quantitative data alone may not allow.
Journal of Logistics, Informatics and Service Science, 2022
Organizational flexibility is a concept that has emerged recently in the international business industry. The purpose of this paper is to help leaders and managers implement flexibility in their organizations and create greater awareness of adapting frameworks to achieve better results. Organizational flexibility represents a new concept in the business field that has not yet been well examined. Previously, organizations were confident and resistant to change. However, with the new emerging technologies and open markets due to the era of globalization, organizations need to be more flexible, timely, effective, and able to change with the changes to survive. Organizational flexibility often plays a dominant role as one of the major factors influencing the survival of firms in the market. This paper shall add to the knowledge of organizational flexibility, the adoption of innovation, and the change of culture toward achieving excellence. This study was conducted using a cross-sectional research design and entailed the use of quantitative techniques for data collection. The contribution of this research will be of interest to both academics and business practitioners.
Strategic Flexibility as a Key to Innovativeness: Theoretical Framework
Conference Paper, 2018
The article reveals the main strategic changes of the competitive environment, and the necessity of flexibility in the new competitive conditions is determined. Flexibility in its various forms has long played an important role in the organizational change and strategy literature. The theoretical approaches to the definition of the concept of "flexibility", "strategy", and "strategic flexibility" is revealed. Various kinds of the flexibility of the company and levels of strategic flexibility are reviewed. With the changed dynamics in the new competitive landscape, firms face multiple discontinuities that often occur simultaneously and are not easily predicted. The article substantiates that managers and government policymakers are encountering major strategic discontinuities that are changing the nature of competition. Firms must be flexible to manage discontinuities and unpredictable changes in their environments. Flexibility is a characteristic of an organization that makes companies less vulnerable to unforeseen external changes or puts them in a better position to respond successfully to change. Strategic flexibility may increase the innovation performance of a firm.
Flexibility, Firm-Specific Turbulence and the Performance of the Long-lived Small Firm
Review of Industrial Organization, 2005
The hypothesis that flexibility enhances the long run prospects of the small firm is explored by examining precipitating causes of organizational change within it, and consequential adjustments. The study is fieldwork based and uses evidence gathered directly from entrepreneurs. New measures of flexibility and firm-specific turbulence are used to explain long-run performance, measured over 28 distinct attributes. Econometric estimates (using GLS and Heckman selectivity correction) are reported, on the relationship between flexibility, firm-specific turbulence and performance. Firm-specific turbulence is shown to have a negative effect on performance, but the latter is enhanced by increasing the flexibility of the small firm.
Strategic Flexibility and Firm Performance : The Case of US Based Transnational Corporations
In a fast-paced globalized world it is very important for transnational corporations (TNCs) to be competitively agile. The Asian currency crisis, shifting foreign direct investment and trade patterns, rise of regional trading blocks, and ongoing developments of the Internet have created environmental turbulence. To gain a competitive advantage, strategic flexibility has become a must for most TNCs. Based on the global strategy framework developed by Yip (1995) and the relevant strategy literature three key areas of strategic flexibility were identified. They are: (i) market flexibility, (ii) production flexibility, and (iii) competitive flexibility. The basic research question was "Does strategic flexibility improves firm profitability?" Three hypotheses were developed, and tested on data from 227 Fortune 500 companies. The independent variables were market flexibility, production flexibility and competitive flexibility, and the dependent variables were the three performance measures Return on Sales (ROS), Return on Assets (ROA) and Earnings before Interest and Tax Margin (EBITM). All three areas of strategic flexibility were found to be significantly related to the firm performance measures.