LABOUR AND THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITY LEARNING TO BE EUROPEAN? (original) (raw)
Related papers
Pivotal powers: The British Labour Party and European unity since 1945
Capital & Class, 2007
This article examines the roots of European unity and Britain's relationship to it, primarily in terms of foreign policy and the failed alternative political economy of the empire/Commonwealth. Continuity of policy emerges as the dominant theme. The strong Atlanticist orientation of the state and its attempts to maintain a special relationship with the USA were objects of a bipartisan approach, as was the commitment to Britain's world role. Membership of the 'European' club in the 1970s did not constitute a break with this tradition so much as an adaptation in circumstances of prolonged relative decline. The article shows how the British left attempted to comprehend European unity in terms of the prospects for socialism and left reform in Britain itself. Cold war origins T his article examines the historical and political background to left-wing perceptions of the European integrationist project since the end of the second world war, focusing on Britain. Without an appreciation of the strategic and foreign-policy dimensions of this project and of British objections to it, no proper analysis of the political economy of European unity is possible. The war itself accelerated the pace of what is now termed 'globalisation', in large measure to address the
The Foreign Policies of the Labour Party
Moving the Social, 2002
The foreign policies pursued by Labour Governments during the twentieth century were chiefly distinguished by their continuity with those of their rivals, the Conservatives, whose Governments dominated the period. The Labour Party was nevertheless the main channel for left-radical dissent over foreign policy from 1918, and until the Second World War the terms of this dissent dominated Labour's rhetoric both inside and outside Parliament. 1 The Cold War divided the party in the 1950s with the leadership and most of the professional politicians often explicitly committed to 'power politics' and 'realism' against the 'emotionalism' of a dissident minority of MPs. 2 Throughout the decade the 'realists' dominated policy but were continuously attacked at annual conference by critics of the United States, NATO and the arms race. The dissidents stressed their suspicion of power politics, secret treaties, and military alliances much as their prewar counterparts had done, often using the same language to demand disarmament, open international discussions, neutrality, action through the UN (rather than NATO) and the need for a 'socialist foreign policy'. Foreign and defence policy generated as much controversy and division as any other area of Labour thinking between 1960 and 1990-particularly during the periods of Labour Government. Since 1990, however, it has had far less capacity to disturb the balance of power within the party. Formative influences The Labour Party originates in a period when British imperialism was ascendant internationally and unchallenged domestically. Foreign policy was not high in the party's priorities in the years 1900-1914 partly because it approved of the hegemonic system of free trade imperialism of which the Liberal Party was the foremost active custodian. The party was patriotic and nursed no fundamental argument with the British state. It accepted the legitimacy of the Crown-in-Parliament and aspired to participate in politics within the established rules, subject to reforms such as the democratic franchise. The party largely subscribed to Liberal ideas on foreign policy, as on much else, but this left plenty of scope for internecine strife. Nineteenth century liberalism was perhaps not the best ideology with which to understand the problems of the twentieth century. The stresses and strains generated by the world crisis of 1914-1945 were unable, however, to change the fact that class loyalty was never superior to national loyalty within the coalition of forces which brought the Labour Party into existence.
Britain, Edward Heath and the EEC 1963-1973
A An n nt t th h ho o on n ny y y J J Jo o oe e el l l H H He e er r rb b be e er r rt t t---W W Wr r ri i ig g gh h ht t t Contents Page Foreword Abstract I Introduction 1 Grande-Bretagne, et le "non" du General 7 Edward Heath: Lord Privy Seal 20 Into Europe, at Last! 28 Conclusion 38 Appendix I 40 Appendix II 41 Appendix III 42 Appendix IV 43 Appendix V 44 Appendix VI 45 Appendix VII 46 Bibliography 47 List of Abbreviations III FOREWORD Since this essay was written, Britain have elected a new Prime Minister, his name is David Cameron of the Conservative Party. The Prime Minister seems to have a quite different approach to the EU and its usefulness to Britain as a country. Cameron is arguing for better value from EU than we currently receive. These events we now face are partly due to the way the common market was designed. This essay will explain the history of the E.E.C (what is now the EU), and Britain's entry into it, along with the importance of it to our nation. This essay does not serve as a definitive guide, but instead as literature to understanding Britain's historical entry into Europe and the context in which it happened. Especially with the EU referendum being expected in the new few years, its time us British really developed an understanding of the EU, in both its historical and present context. I ABSTRACT This study of legislative and political history was written to bring an updated perspective on the British political and economic issues that led to Britain's entry into the European Economic Community. This dissertation has utilized parliamentary papers, newspapers of the period, biographies and books discussing the European Economic Community and Britain's relationship with Europe. Its main purpose is to analyse the former Conservative
Nations and Nationalism, 2013
Is there such a thing as 'English' nationalism? How may we discern a nationalism that has been historically merged with wider categories of belonging, including Britain and the Empire? Ben Wellings' thoughtful book builds on an emerging body of literature that views English nationalism as an understated -yet existent -phenomenon. In doing so, it also tackles a wider and very interesting question in the nationalism literature, i.e. how may we understand the process of identity formation of a nation that constitutes the 'visible majority' in a given country? By providing a chronological account of the emergence and development of English nationalism, the book argues that it is the act of resistance to Europe that laid the foundations for the formation of contemporary English nationalism. Euroscepticism -as opposed to, potentially, the issue of devolution -is both the cause and the expression of English nationalism.
Socialists and European Integration: The Attitudes of British Labour Members of Parliament*
European Journal of Political Research, 1981
This analysis of the attitudes of British Labour Members of Parliament towards European integration focuses in particular on attitudes towards three themes: integrationist policies, the 'national interest' and ideological identitication. Based on the results of a survey of Labour MPs, it suggests the importance of the ideology and national interest dimensions to any explanatiori of their stance towards the operation of the European Community. The discussion also indicates the relevance of the writings of Tom Nairn and the limitations inherent in adopting a framework based on conventional integration theory.
The British left and Europe: a progressive dilemma?
2009
The British left's relationship with the EU has long been the focus of debate, as advocates of further integration clash with those sceptical about the rationality of this process as a bulwark against globalisation. However, the belief that the EU provides the potential for realising a progressive social and economic policy is problematic. Whilst faith has been placed in the creation of a 'Social Europe', this remains patchy in both coverage and generosity. Moreover, the neo-liberal framework associated with EMU requires the separate formulation of monetary policy by the ECB from nationally determined fiscal policy, itself constrained by the SGP. Consequently, either the left redoubles its efforts within the EU to realise fundamental reform, or else considers other more globally orientated alternatives. However, to facilitate such strategies the nature of the UK's relationship with the EU is called into question; whether by championing internal reform of the organisation, or pursuing a more independent approach that might produce more egalitarian results. The former has been explored extensively in the literature, whilst the latter remains largely unexplored territory. Consequently, this paper analyses a number of these options and evaluates their potential benefits and costs from a social science-wide political economy framework.