member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society of (original) (raw)
Related papers
Graduate And Undergraduate Design Projects Utilizing A Virtual Product Life Cycle Management (Vplm)
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
has extensive expertise in the design and development of complex systems. Prior to coming to Georgia Tech in 1984, Dr. Schrage served as an aviator, engineer, manager and senior executive servant with the U.S. Army Aviation Systems Command (AVSCOM) for ten years. As a dynamics, vibrations and aeroelasticity engineer he served as the Army's expert in these areas during the design and development of all the Army's major aviation systems, the UH-60 Black Hawk, the AH-64 Apache, the CH-47D Chinook, and the OH-58D Kiowa Warrior, as well as major upgrades to Army Aviation fixed wing aircraft, such as the RU-21D, and OV-1D Mohawk. In addition, he served as the dynamics evaluator and technical area chief on Army Aviation major Source Selection Evaluation Boards (SSEBs), that led to the development of these systems. As the Chief of the Structures and Aeromechanics Division, Dr. Schrage oversaw the airworthiness qualification efforts for all new and upgraded Army aviation systems and provided engineering support to the program managers on these systems. As the Director for Advanced Systems, Dr. Schrage oversaw the Command's Science and Technology program, a joint program with NASA, and led the concept development of new systems, such as the LHX, which led to the development of the RAH-66 Comanche. Dr. Schrage also served on a temporary assignment as the Chief Scientist for the Army's Combined Arms Center (CAC) and was an active duty Army aviator and field artillery officer with combat experience in Southeast Asia. Dr. Schrage became a professor of Aerospace Engineering and Rotorcraft Design Professor at Georgia Tech in 1984 and the Director of the Center of Excellence in Rotorcraft Technology (CERT) in 1986. Also, during the 1980s, he served as a consultant for the Army (Army Science Board), Air Force (Air Force Studies Board), the Institute for Defense Analysis (IDA) and industry. As a consultant for IDA he was involved with many of the Quality and Concurrent Engineering activities that took place during this decade. In 1989 Dr. Schrage introduced Concurrent Engineering and Design for Life Cycle Cost into Georgia Tech aerospace systems design curriculum. As a member of the National Center for Advanced Technologies (NCAT) Executive Committee since 1989, Dr. Schrage defined the Integrated Product/Process Development (IPPD) methodology that was taught by NCAT through short courses and video based instruction for the Army and Navy as part of the DoD acquisition reform effort. In the early 1990s, Dr. Schrage led the effort to put together the Georgia Tech formal graduate program in Aerospace Systems Design based on the generic IPPD methodology he defined. This graduate program is supported by the Aerospace Systems Design Laboratory (ASDL), which Dr. Schrage helped to initiate in 1992. In 1995, the Space Systems Design Laboratory (SSDL) was formed and now both ASDL and SSDL are overseen by the Center for Aerospace Systems Analysis (CASA), which Dr. Schrage co-directs. This unique graduate program consists of five required graduate courses for a master's degree and has attracted over 200 graduate students into the program. Most of these students were outstanding undergraduate students either at Georgia Tech or other leading engineering schools around the world. The Georgia Tech Graduate Program in Aerospace Systems Design has become a model for other leading university engineering programs and based on an IPPD methodology and a Robust Design Simulation (RDS) environment provides the modern approach to systems engineering, desired by industry and government. Also, in the early 1990s, Dr. Schrage helped initiate the International Aerial Robotics Competition, which has become highly successful internationally. Research spinoffs from this competition has placed Georgia Tech in a leadership role in the design and development of intelligent unmanned aerials vehicle (UAV) testbeds, as evidenced by recent demonstrated successes in DARPA Software Enabled Control (SEC) program, where Georgia Tech was chosen as the university experiment leader. Dr. Schrage serves a principal investigator on this program. In the late 1990s, Dr. Schrage developed a unique graduate course in "Safety By Design and Flight Certification". This project oriented course has a team of students develop a Preliminary System Safety Analysis (PSSA) and a Flight Certification Plan for different aircraft and spacecraft. Dr. Schrage's recent experiences as a member of the FAA's Oversight Board for their Certification Process Study and the NASA Aviation Safety
Reengineering of design and manufacturing processes
Computers & Industrial Engineering, 1994
... rights reserved 0360-8352/94 $7.00+ 0.00 REENGINEERING OF DESIGN AND MANUFACTURING PROCESSES ANDREW KUSIAK, T. NICK LARSON and ... became apparent, variations and extensions of structured analysis were proposed by Page-Jones [2], Gane and ...
2008 Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
He received his B.S., M.E., and Ph.D. degrees in mechanical engineering from the University of Florida in 1985, 1991 and 1995, respectively. Dr. Stanfill has over ten years' industrial experience and has designed gas turbine hardware for fighter aircraft-most recently the Joint Strike Fighter. He served as a key resource to the New Product Development Council Steering Committee, facilitated Design for X (DFx) workshops internationally, developed business process linkages between new product development and lean manufacturing, and developed and implemented manufacturing systems software. His interests include technology transfer, product development, design education and DFx. He is a registered professional engineer in the state of Florida and is a member of the American Society of Mechanical Engineers and the American Society for Engineering Education.
Industrial Design - New Frontiers
2011
Report for early dissemination of its contents. In view of the transfer of copyright to the outside publisher, its distribution outside of IBM prior to publication should be limited to peer communications and specific requests. After outside publication, requests should be filled only by reprints or legally obtained copies of the article (e.g. , payment of royalties). Copies may be requested from IBM T.
Bomber R&D Since 1945: The Role of Experience
IaAnecdotal evidence suggests that experience plays a critical role in the cost-effectiveness design and development of successful military aircraft. Understanding the true situation may be essential to meet Air Force needs despite declining R&D budgets, few new programs starts, and industry contraction. To examine this issue, the authors explore the history of U.S. bomber production since the end of World War I. They conclude that relevant experience does, indeed, matter-firms develop valuable system-specific knowledge in ongoing work, and experience in important new technologies has a distinct advantage. There is far less correlation between commercial and aircraft than was once thought, so such experience is unlikely to be useful. And since major breakthroughs in technology, design approaches, and concepts have come far more often from government !nbs !han from the commercial se.tor, the cntribNition of "dual-use" technology to future military aircraft design and development may be limited. .536.
Learning from the Design Methodology of Famous Aerospace Innovators
2014
Four case studies of innovative designs by expert designers are cast in the framework of a conceptual design method called “Parameter Analysis”. We show that the design processes have many characteristics of Parameter Analysis, even though the designers probably did not follow any prescribed method, but rather used their intuition and expertise. The conclusion of the study is that Parameter Analysis is a suitable method for teaching and practicing innovative conceptual design when traditional aerospace design methods are not applicable.