Nanomedicine as a Promising Tool to Overcome Immune Escape in Breast Cancer (original) (raw)
Related papers
Tumor-Targeted Nanomedicine for Immunotherapy
Accounts of Chemical Research, 2020
Metrics & More Article Recommendations CONSPECTUS: Therapeutic manipulation of the immune system against cancer has revolutionized the treatment of several advanced-stage tumors. While many have benefited from these treatments, the proportion of patients responding to immunotherapies is still low. Nanomedicines have promise to revolutionize tumor treatments through spatiotemporal control of drug activity. Such control of drug function could allow enhanced therapeutic actions of immunotherapies and reduced side effects. However, only a handful of formulations have been able to reach human clinical studies so far, and even fewer systems are being used in the clinic. Among translatable formulations, self-assembled nanomedicines have shown unique and versatile features for dealing with the heterogeneity and malignancy of tumors in the clinic. Such nanomedicines can be designed to promote antitumor immune responses through a series of immunopotentiating functions after being directly injected into tumors, or achieving selective tumor accumulation upon intravenous administration. Thus, tumor-targeted nanomedicines can enhance antitumor immunity by several mechanisms, such as inducing immunogenic damage to cancer cells, altering the tumor immune microenvironment by delivering immunomodulators, or eliminating or reprogramming immunosuppressive cells, enhancing the exposure of tumorassociated antigens to antigen presenting cells, stimulating innate immunity mechanisms, and facilitating the infiltration of antitumor immune cells and their interaction with cancer cells. Moreover, nanomedicines can be engineered to sense intratumoral stimuli for activating specific immune responses or installed with ligands for increasing drug levels in tumors, granting subcellular delivery, and triggering immune signals and proliferation of immune cells. Thus, the ability of nanomedicines to exert immunomodulatory functions selectively in tumor and tumor-associated tissues, such as draining lymph nodes, increases the efficiency of the treatments, while avoiding systemic immunosuppressive toxicities and the exacerbation of adverse immune responses. Moreover, the compartmentalized structure of self-assembled nanomedicines offers the possibility to coload a variety of drugs for controlled pharmacokinetics, enhanced tumor delivery, and synergistic therapeutic output. Also, by integrating imaging functionalities into nanomedicines, it is possible to develop theranostic platforms reporting the immune settings of tumors as well as the effects of nanomedicines on the tumor immune microenvironment. Herein, we critically reviewed significant strategies for developing nanomedicines capable of potentiating antitumor immune responses by surmounting biological barriers and modulating antitumor immune signals. Moreover, the potential of these nanomedicines for developing innovative anticancer treatments by targeting particular cells is discussed. Finally, we present our perspectives on the awaiting challenges and future directions of nanomedicines in the age of immunotherapy.
Nanobiotechnology and Immunotherapy: Two Powerful and Cooperative Allies against Cancer
Cancers
A number of novel cancer therapies have recently emerged that have rapidly moved from the bench to the clinic. Onco-immunotherapies, such as immune checkpoint blockade inhibitors and adoptive cell therapies, have revolutionized the field, since they provide a way to induce strong anti-tumor immune responses, which are able to fight cancer effectively. However, despite showing great efficacy in hematological and some solid tumors, unresponsiveness, development of therapy resistance and the development of serious adverse effects, limit their capacity to impact the vast majority of tumors. Nanoparticle-based delivery systems are versatile vehicles for a wide variety of molecular cargoes and provide an innovative strategy to improve conventional onco-immunotherapies. They can be finely tuned to release their contents in the tumor microenvironment, or to deliver combinations of adjuvants and antigens in the case of nanovaccines. In this review, we summarize the recent advancements in the...
Nano-Enhanced Cancer Immunotherapy: Immunology Encounters Nanotechnology
Cells
Cancer immunotherapy utilizes the immune system to fight cancer and has already moved from the laboratory to clinical application. However, and despite excellent therapeutic outcomes in some hematological and solid cancers, the regular clinical use of cancer immunotherapies reveals major limitations. These include the lack of effective immune therapy options for some cancer types, unresponsiveness to treatment by many patients, evolving therapy resistance, the inaccessible and immunosuppressive nature of the tumor microenvironment (TME), and the risk of potentially life-threatening immune toxicities. Given the potential of nanotechnology to deliver, enhance, and fine-tune cancer immunotherapeutic agents, the combination of cancer immunotherapy with nanotechnology can overcome some of these limitations. In this review, we summarize innovative reports and novel strategies that successfully combine nanotechnology and cancer immunotherapy. We also provide insight into how nanoparticular...
Combining activatable nanodelivery with immunotherapy in a murine breast cancer model
Journal of Controlled Release, 2019
A successful chemotherapy-immunotherapy solid-tumor protocol should accomplish the following goals: debulk large tumors, release tumor antigen for cross-presentation and cross-priming, release cancer-suppressive cytokines and enhance anti-tumor immune cell populations. Thermallyactivated drug delivery particles have the potential to synergize with immunotherapeutics to accomplish these goals; activation can release chemotherapy within bulky solid tumors and can enhance response when combined with immunotherapy. We set out to determine whether a single protocol, combining locally-activated chemotherapy and agonist immunotherapy, could accomplish these goals and yield a potentially translational therapy. For effective delivery of free doxorubicin to tumors with minimal toxicity, we stabilized doxorubicin with copper in temperature-sensitive liposomes that rapidly release free drug in the vasculature of cancer lesions upon exposure to ultrasound-mediated hyperthermia. We found that in vitro exposure of tumor *
Nanotherapeutics Plus Immunotherapy in Oncology: Who Brings What to the Table?
Pharmaceutics
While the number of oncology-related nanotherapeutics and immunotherapies is constantly increasing, cancer patients still suffer from a lack of efficacy and treatment resistance. Among the investigated strategies, patient selection and combinations appear to be of great hope. This review will focus on combining nanotherapeutics and immunotherapies together, how they can dually optimize each other to face such limits, bringing us into a new field called nano-immunotherapy. While looking at current clinical trials, we will expose how passive immunotherapies, such as antibodies and ADCs, can boost nanoparticle tumor uptake and tumor cell internalization. Conversely, we will study how immunotherapies can benefit from nanotherapeutics which can optimize their lipophilicity, permeability, and distribution (e.g., greater tumor uptake, BBB crossing, etc.), tumor, tumor microenvironment, and immune system targeting properties.
Immune approaches to the treatment of breast cancer, around the corner?
Breast Cancer Research, 2014
Immunotherapy for the treatment of breast cancer can be categorized as either (a) specific stimulation of the immune system by active immunization, with cancer vaccines, or (b) passive immunization, such as tumor-specific antibodies (including immune modulators) or adoptive cell therapy that inhibit the function of, or directly kill, tumor cells. We will present the current information and the future perspectives of immunotherapy in patients with breast cancer, including the prognostic role of tumor infiltrating lymphocytes, immune signatures, targeted therapies modulating the immune system, and tumor antigen cancer vaccines. Active immunotherapy in breast cancer and its implementation into clinical trials have been largely a frustrating experience in the last decades. The concept that the immune system regulates cancer development is experiencing a new era of interest. It is clear that the cancer immunosurveillance process indeed exists and potentially acts as an extrinsic tumor suppressor. Also, the immune system can facilitate tumor progression by sculpting the immunogenic phenotype of tumors as they develop. Cancer immunoediting represents a refinement of the cancer immunosurveillance hypothesis and resumes the complex interaction between tumor and immune system into three phases: elimination, equilibrium, and escape. Major topics in the field of immunology deserve a response: what do we know about tumor immunogenicity, and how might we therapeutically improve tumor immunogenicity? How can we modulate response of the immune system? Is there any gene signature predictive of response to immune modulators? The success of future immunotherapy strategies will depend on the identification of additional immunogenic antigens that can serve as the best tumorrejection targets. Therapeutic success will depend on developing the best antigen delivery systems and on the elucidation of the entire network of immune signaling pathways that regulate immune responses in the tumor microenvironment.
Exploration of Medicine
Cancer is the leading cause of mortality worldwide, which necessitates our consideration related to novel treatment approach. Tumor cells at the tumor microenvironment (TME), regulate a plethora of key mechanistic signaling pathways that obstruct antitumor immune responses by immune suppression, immune resistance or acquired immune tolerance. The present therapeutic regimes are provided independently or in combination, or as immunotherapies for cancer immune targeting. Immunotherapy has altered the arena of oncology and patient care. By using the host immune system, the immunostimulatory molecules can exert a robust, personalized response against the patient’s own tumors. Alternatively, tumors may exploit these strategies to escape immune recognition, and accordingly, such mechanisms represent chances for immunotherapy intervention. Nonetheless, despite promising outcomes from immunotherapies in recurrent and metastatic cancers, immune-therapeutics in clinics has been limited owing ...
Nanoparticle-based immunotherapy for cancer
ACS nano, 2015
The design of nanovaccines capable of triggering effective antitumor immunity requires an understanding of how the immune system senses and responds to threats, including pathogens and tumors. Equally important is an understanding of the mechanisms employed by tumor cells to evade immunity and an appreciation of the deleterious effects that antitumor immune responses can have on tumor growth, such as by skewing tumor cell composition toward immunologically silent tumor cell variants. The immune system and tumors engage in a tug-of-war driven by competition where promoting antitumor immunity or tumor cell death alone may be therapeutically insufficient. Nanotechnology affords a unique opportunity to develop therapeutic compounds than can simultaneously tackle both aspects, favoring tumor eradication. Here, we review the current status of nanoparticle-based immunotherapeutic strategies for the treatment of cancer, ranging from antigen/adjuvant delivery vehicles (to professional antige...
Molecules, 2021
Clinically, different approaches are adopted worldwide for the treatment of cancer, which still ranks second among all causes of death. Immunotherapy for cancer treatment has been the focus of attention in recent years, aiming for an eventual antitumoral effect through the immune system response to cancer cells both prophylactically and therapeutically. The application of nanoparticulate delivery systems for cancer immunotherapy, which is defined as the use of immune system features in cancer treatment, is currently the focus of research. Nanomedicines and nanoparticulate macromolecule delivery for cancer therapy is believed to facilitate selective cytotoxicity based on passive or active targeting to tumors resulting in improved therapeutic efficacy and reduced side effects. Today, with more than 55 different nanomedicines in the market, it is possible to provide more effective cancer diagnosis and treatment by using nanotechnology. Cancer immunotherapy uses the body’s immune system...
PubMed, 2021
Triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) is more aggressive and has a poorer prognosis than other sub-types of breast tumors. This study elucidates how aspartate beta-hydroxylase (ASPH) network promotes drug resistance, and immunotherapy targeting ASPH may improve the efficacy of Doxorubicin (DOX) therapy. An orthotopic model of breast cancer generated by 4T1 cells in immunocompetent mice was used to explore efficacy of immunotherapy in combination with DOX chemotherapy. We evaluated mRNA and protein expression in cultured tumor cells and tissue, as well as assessed cell proliferation, apoptosis, soluble factors/cytokine production, immune cell population diversity and function. We observed that ASPH expression enables TNBC cells to exhibit primary resistance to DOX induced single-/double-strand breaks (SSB/DSB) and enhanced proliferation and survival. Specific bio-nanoparticle based therapeutic vaccine (BNP-TV) promoted ASPH uptake by and maturation of DCs. This BNP-TV combined with DOX induces immunogenic cell death (ICD) in orthotopic xenograft tumors and significantly suppressed primary mammary tumor growth and distant multi-organ metastases. Immunogenic cell death induced by BNP-TV targeting ASPH combined with DOX provides opportunities to treat a highly resistant and metastatic form of breast cancer.