Contemporary Historiography on Christianity in Vandal and Byzantine Africa (1785-2020) (original) (raw)
2021, REVISTA DE HISTORIOGRAFÍA (RevHisto)
The present chapter examines the historiography of Vandal and Byzantine religion from ca. 1785 to the present. Until relatively recently, extended studies of post-Roman North Africa were scarce. The works of Charles Diehl (1896) and Christian Courtois (1955) are striking exceptions within a field primarily interested in earlier periods of North African history. During the 19th century, the Vandals were primarily viewed for their military and political activity, rather than their religious policies, and Byzantine Africa was generally presented as a coda to Roman and early Christian periods of occupation. The dramatic expansion of archaeological and philological scholarship in the latter part of the twentieth century had an important effect upon the understanding of these groups, but it is only in the last twenty years that detailed scrutiny of the later periods of pre-Islamic North Africa have become widespread.
Sign up for access to the world's latest research.
checkGet notified about relevant papers
checkSave papers to use in your research
checkJoin the discussion with peers
checkTrack your impact
Related papers
The Vandal Conquest of North Africa: Origins of a Historiographical Persona
Journal of Ecclesiastical History, 2017
A close reading of sources documenting the Vandal conquest (429–39 ce) reveals that contemporary authors did not present the event as a persecution. To be sure, they insisted on the devastation that the Vandals caused, the typical woes of war, but not on its religious motivation. The article argues that it was Augustine who, in his ep. ccxxviii, first presented a theological interpretation of the event that allowed later sources writing within the Augustinian tradition to frame the conquest retroactively as a persecution.
2017
in the Three Chapters dispute was not the protection of local practice, but rather an absolute deference to the authority of the Council of Chalcedon; if anything, the bishops of the African church were motivated by their concern to be active members of a universal church. Ch. 5 'The Moorish Alternative' is a difcult outlier, but the territory is navigated with condence. Once proud and unambiguous Romani, many of the inhabitants of the Mauretanian provinces, Numidia and inland Tripolitania found themselves viewed with disdain as barbaric Mauri by the time of the Byzantine conquest. But if the Mauri of Corippus and Procopius do frequently sound like barbarians, they acted in ways that would not have been completely alien to the aristocrats of Carthage. Spectacular as the Djedar tumuli near Tiaret may seem, they were adorned with Latin inscriptions. Other well-known inscriptions, such as those of Masgiven at Altava and Masties in the Aurès mountains, also reveal a rm desire to articulate authority in a familiar 'Roman' mode. In part, of course, this is simply a reection of the nature of our sources, and forms of identity display (and political organization) which were not inscribed in Latin on prominent stones are invisible to us. But what survives remains important. C. provides a tremendously helpful summary of this material, and a series of important observations about its interpretation. In many ways, the specic title of C.'s book belies its true value. While important observations are certainly offered here about the changing nature of 'Roman' (and other) identities in Late Antiquity, these are based upon exceptionally rm foundations. As a starting point for Vandal and Moorish history in this periodstill better as a thorough overview of the status quaestionis on the murky world of Byzantine Africa-C.'s book is to be warmly recommended.
Loading Preview
Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.