Multi-Level Governance and Civil Society: Comparing Non-State Actors in International Organizations Theoretical Aspects on NGO- Participation in the United Nations and the European Union (original) (raw)
Related papers
Ngo Engagement in the United Nations and Its Impact on the International System
2019
The paper presents conclusions of a research on consequences of the role acquired by NGOs directly engaged in the UN on the form of the international system. Is the role which NGOs gain in the UN big enough for us to be able to talk about emergence of a qualitatively new form of the international system? Drawing upon ideas by neo-liberal institutionalists and social constructivists, the presented research focuses on revealing possible contribution of NGO engagement in the UN to fulfilling traits characteristic for different alternative international system designs, such as global governance, multi-layered governance and world government. The research is based on preliminary determination of structural elements of these alternative international system designs which are then confronted with contribution towards their realization by NGOs engaged in the UN. This contribution is assessed independently for each of the structural element of the alternative international system designs wit...
Social Science Research Network, 2010
A preeminent feature of the post 1990 World is the role been played by Nongovernmental Organizations (NGOs) in the emerging global public space. NGOs have become very important actors on the global scene; contributing to, and sometimes determining the form and content of global public policy. Indeed, ala globalization, they are today able to provide institutional infrastructure, knowledge, and material resources for citizens to engage local governments and global policy-making institutions. This role of NGOs in the global public space has not only redefined the matrix of global governance institutions, but also of the ideas of global citizenship. What has accounted for the rise in the role of NGOs in the global public space? How have /are they contributing to refining global public policies? And what are the emerging institutional challenges facing the NGO sector? It is these questions that are reflected upon in this study. INTRODUCTION. A growing significant feature of today's global politics and governance, is the preeminent role played by Non-Governmental Organizations (NGO). These organizations have today
Central European Journal of International and Security Studies, 2020
What is the role of NGOs at the United Nations, and, by extension, in global governance? With limited possibilities to measure it directly, this article adopts discursive analysis as an innovative approach to the issue. Analysis of three texts by Global Policy Forum represents an important insight into the question and a tool for further research. It shows that despite the relative increase of their participatory rights at the UN, NGOs seem to realise approaching a point of saturation in what they may demand from the UN in terms of their access and moderate the tone of writing accordingly. Drawing on Global Policy Forum’s example, the article argues that NGOs at the UN appear to have transformed from entities begging for more access to its more equal partners. Most importantly, the article represents a blueprint for further research of role of actors in the international system.
Governance to Governmentality: Analyzing NGOs, States, and Power
Studies of global governance typically claim that the state has lost power to nonstate actors and that political authority is increasingly institutionalized in spheres not controlled by states. In this article, we challenge the core claims in the literature on global governance. Rather than focusing on the relative power of states and nonstate actors, we focus on the sociopolitical functions and processes of governance in their own right and seek to identify their rationality as practices of political rule. For this task, we use elements of the conception of power developed by Michel Foucault in his studies of ''governmentality.'' In this perspective, the role of nonstate actors in shaping and carrying out global governance-functions is not an instance of transfer of power from the state to nonstate actors but rather an expression of a changing logic or rationality of government (defined as a type of power) by which civil society is redefined from a passive object of government to be acted upon into an entity that is both an object and a subject of government. The argument is illustrated by two case studies: the international campaign to ban landmines, and international population policy. The cases show that the self-association and political will-formation characteristic of civil society and nonstate actors do not stand in opposition to the political power of the state, but is a most central feature of how power, understood as government, operates in late modern society.
International NGOs (Oxford Bibliographies in Political Science)
International nongovernmental organizations (NGOs or INGOs) are studied from a wide range of academic disciplinary perspectives, and the perspectives and literature are diverse and growing rapidly. This article approaches the topic from a political science perspective and, in particular, from the perspective of the international relations field in political science. It also includes a range of sources from helpful instructional readings to more sophisticated works that have been influential among scholars in the field. The list incorporates both some of the newest work of theoretical and empirical importance and older works that have been important to the development of this topic of study. The scholars who study international NGOs use a variety of conceptual categories for their analysis. Hence, anyone searching for literature on this topic will find fruitful results by searching for a number of terms, including, for example: “transnational civil society,” “transnational advocacy networks,” “transnational social movements,” and “global civil society.” NGOs are also variously called “civil society organizations,” “social movement organizations,” or “nonprofit organizations.” In European literature they are often discussed as “interest groups.”
Volker Heins: Nongovernmental Organizations in International Society: Struggles Over Recognition
Human Rights Review, 2008
Volker Heins' newest contribution to the deepening debate on the origins, organization, and influence of international non-governmental organization (NGOs) is a thought-provoking blend of international relations theory, political theory, and real-world illustrations. This book draws together an impressive number of themes, including the changing nature of the state, the impact of shifting values on society, and the relationships between state and society and power and morality, into a concise and enjoyable explanation of the significance of NGOs. But there is a twist. NGOs are the heroes of the story, but they are convincingly characterized as parasites whose contributions to international society are mixed. While I want to challenge several of the arguments presented, Heins lays the ground for a fertile debate. His book has great potential to advance theorizing about NGOs, a pursuit which has been lacking in international relations. In NGOs in International Society, Heins makes three important contributions to a systematic, theoretical understanding of NGOs. First, he carefully dissects NGOs as organizations in order to understand what they do, why they do it, and why this matters. This approach, similar to that advocated by Michael Barnett and Martha Finnemore (2004), enables Heins to avoid the normative gloss which can accompany NGO research which takes NGO self-descriptions at face value. Heins argues that NGOs, defined as "post-traditional and other-regarding civil associations that act on behalf of distant strangers, including future generations and nonhuman species" (12), can be analyzed as a single category based on their fundamental characteristics and purposes. This provides a macro-perspective on their origins and operations and avoids the perils of focusing on their idiosyncrasies or ad hoc accounts of success or failure. While a theoretical rather than empirical work, Heins presents a unique perspective on NGOs characterized as parasites (36-40, 103-105). NGOs are neither agents of states nor independent of states' resources, preferences, and