Competing perspectives on the Big Data revolution: a typology of applications in public policy (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Politics of Big Data: A Three-Level Analysis
2013
What role does politics play in the emerging Big Data domain? The paper argues that Big Data political power struggles surface at three distinct levels of analysis: the social sciences, the information state, and bureaucratic politics. At the social sciences level of analysis, Big Data threatens to divide social scientists into antagonistic methodological camps as it does not conform to traditional research techniques. At the information state level of analysis, a handful of powerful agencies and corporations created around data generation are consolidating their competitive advantage and are unlikely to support important data access and privacy protections. The one brighter spot for Big Data is found inside governmental bureaucracy. Here, trends such as “governance by numbers” at the sub-national level and mutually profitable data exchanges at the national level suggest that Big Data may propel agencies to share information better. The article concludes with a proposal to view Dr. John Snow and his work to stop the cholera epidemic in central London in 1854 as an early harbinger of the Big Data movement. Snow’s work displays redeeming features that may mitigate less desirable effects of Big Data projects across the three levels of analysis. These features are a sense of purpose, ingenuity, clever data collection design, collaboration, humility and humanity. Lay summary: The paper explores the role of political power struggles in the emergent big data domain. It finds that power struggles manifest in three arenas: the social sciences, the information state, and public sector bureaucracy. The most positive opportunities for utilizing and advancing big data are in the arena of government bureaucracy where big data may prompt agencies to engage in more efficient data sharing. Publication significance: Big data and its impact on the citizen, society and the state is of increasing importance in the information state. This timely paper examines the political power struggles that influence the potential of big data to benefit or burden citizens and the state. The paper's findings (that big data is potentially most beneficial at the level of government bureaucracy where it can prompt agencies to share data more efficiently) present a focused future direction for big data research and innovation.
Big data technologies are increasingly being utilised in the field of social policy. Although big data methods and strategies are often preferred as a form of evidence-based policy development, big data techniques do not necessarily guarantee scientific objectivity. Hamish Robertson and Joanne Travaglia discuss concerns about the rapid growth in big data methods being used to inform and shape social policy strategies and practices, and particularly the underlying assumptions such data are used to support and “verify”.
Big Data & Society: Big Data & Society On behalf of
he Snowden revelations about National Security Agency surveillance, starting in 2013, along with the ambiguous complicity of internet companies and the international controversies that followed provide a perfect segue into con- temporary conundrums of surveillance and Big Data. Attention has shifted from late C20th information technologies and networks to a C21st focus on data, currently crystallized in ‘‘Big Data.’’ Big Data intensifies certain surveillance trends associated with information technology and networks, and is thus implicated in fresh but fluid configurations. This is considered in three main ways: One, the capacities of Big Data (including metadata) intensify surveillance by expanding interconnected datasets and analytical tools. Existing dynamics of influence, risk-management, and control increase their speed and scope through new techniques, especially predictive analytics. Two, while Big Data appears to be about size, qualitative change in surveillance practices is...
Big data, bigger dilemmas: A critical review
Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 2015
The recent interest in Big Data has generated a broad range of new academic, corporate, and policy practices along with an evolving debate among its proponents, detractors, and skeptics. While the practices draw on a common set of tools, techniques, and technologies, most contributions to the debate come either from a particular disciplinary perspective or with a focus on a domain-specific issue. A close examination of these contributions reveals a set of common problematics that arise in various guises and in different places. It also demonstrates the need for a critical synthesis of the conceptual and practical dilemmas surrounding Big Data. The purpose of this article is to provide such a synthesis by drawing on relevant writings in the sciences, humanities, policy, and trade literature. In bringing these diverse literatures together, we aim to shed light on the common underlying issues that concern and affect all of these areas. By contextualizing the phenomenon of Big Data within larger socioeconomic developments, we also seek to provide a broader understanding of its drivers, barriers, and challenges. This approach allows us to identify attributes of Big Data that require more attention—autonomy, opacity, generativity, disparity, and futurity—leading to questions and ideas for moving beyond dilemmas.
Looking into Big Data: The Case of the U. S. Federal Government
Proceedings of the 10th International Joint Conference on Knowledge Discovery, Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, 2018
This paper reports on a study that aimed to examine the term big data for its meaning in a particular setting. The study chose the U.S. Federal Government as its case and analysed all the big data projects and programs identified as representative of the U.S. Big Data Initiative. It constructed an analytical framework and generated findings in forms of statistic descriptions and narrative discussions. The study discovered that 1) not all the big data projects and programs possess in a collective manner the typical 3 Vs (i.e., volume, variety, and velocity), 2) variety appears to be the most valued characteristic, and 3) to-be-collected data lags largely behind existing data, indicating that technologies such as the Internet of Things are still at the stage of being developed. It also unrevealed that the U.S. Federal Government's current big data focus is heavily placed on IT and the term big data has made that focus hidden. It then suggests to sufficiently distinguish data and the technologies underlying the various features of data so that collaborations between the owners of data and technologies can be forged with easiness and big data benefits can be realized with efficiency and effectiveness.
A Digital Janus: Looking Forward, Looking Back
Harms arising from digital data use in the big data context are often systemic and cannot always be captured by linear cause and effect. Individual data subjects and third parties can bear the main downstream costs arising from increasingly complex forms of data useswithout being able to trace the exact data flows. Because current regulatory frameworks do not adequately address this situation, we propose a move towards harm mitigation tools to complement existing legal remedies. In this article, we make a normative and practical case for why individuals should be offered support in such contexts and how harm mitigation tools can achieve this. We put forward the idea of 'Harm Mitigation Bodies' (HMBs) which people could turn to who feel they were harmed by data use but do not qualify for legal remedies, or that existing legal remedies do not address their specific circumstances. HMBs would help to obtain a better understanding of the nature, severity, and frequency of harms occurring from both legal and illegal data use, and they could also provide financial support in some cases. We set out the role and form of these HMBs for the first time in this article.
2018 - Tracing Big Data Imaginaries through Public Policy: The Case of the European Commission
Across the globe, the notion of Big Data has received much attention, not only in technology and business circles but also among political authorities. Public officials in Europe, the U.S., and beyond have formulated Big Data strategies that will steer I(C)T development towards certain goals and aspirations. Drawing on official European Commission documents and using the notion of sociotechnical imaginaries as a sensitising concept, this chapter investigates the values, beliefs, and interests that guide European policymakers' Big Data rhetoric, making the argument that while the Commission's embrace of a strong free-market position can be partly explained in terms of vexing economic, institutional, and epistemic challenges, its push for Big Data solutions threatens to undermine democratic rights and principles as well as efforts towards responsible research and innovation. The article concludes with recommendations for further research, emphasising the need for cross-disciplinary dialogue and scholarship.
Regulation of Big Data: Perspectives on strategy, policy, law and privacy
Health and Technology, 2017
This article encapsulates selected themes from the Australian Data to Decisions Cooperative Research Centre's Law and Policy program. It is the result of a discussion on the regulation of Big Data, especially focusing on privacy and data protection strategies. It presents four complementary perspectives stemming from governance, law, ethics, and computer science. Big, Linked, and Open Data constitute complex phenomena whose economic and political dimensions require a plurality of instruments to enhance and protect citizens' rights. Some conclusions are offered in the end to foster a more general discussion.
'Big data' and policy learning
I first define what the term ‘big data’ means and consider where it fits within the already established ‘tools of government’. Section two examines the varied and increasingly plentiful sources of big data, and considers how the phenomenon is linked with the digital revolution that is still working its way through many civil society institutions, especially government agencies and the public sector. I next consider how social sciences’ methods of analysis need to change as a result of big data’s arrival. Section four considers how ‘big data’ could alter public policy-making, and yet may not do so as much as one might think, because of barriers and time lags in its use. The brief conclusions situate these substantial but differently-facing implications within a far longer-run tendency of modern ICT changes to be simultaneously centralizing and decentralizing in their implications.
Early social science research about Big Data
Science and Public Policy, 2016
Recent emerging technology policies seek to diminish negative impacts while equitably and responsibly accruing and distributing benefits. Social scientists play a role in these policies, but relatively little quantitative research has been undertaken to study how social scientists inform the assessment of emerging technologies. This paper addresses this gap by examining social science research on 'Big Data', an emerging technology of wide interest. This paper analyzes a dataset of fields extracted from 488 social science and humanities papers written about Big Data. Our focus is on understanding the multi-dimensional nature of societal assessment by examining the references upon which these papers draw. We find that eight sub-literatures are important in framing social science research about Big Data. These results indicate that the field is evolving from general sociological considerations toward applications issues and privacy concerns. Implications for science policy and technology assessment of societal implications are discussed.