Labour Unrest in the Global Political Economy: The Case of China's 2010 Strike Wave (original) (raw)
Related papers
The Role of the State, Labour Policy and Migrant Workers' Struggles in Globalized China
The financial crisis of 2008 brought many changes to the world economy with China seeming to stand out as one of the countries best able to weather the storm. There is a general belief that this is because China has a strong state which has reshaped the role of China in the new international division of labour and has the ability to resume its economic development internally. Our study of labour policy and workers' struggles tells a different story. We argue that the state-driven process of economic globalization has created a new millionsstrong working class in China. A paradoxical phenomenon is that this state-driven process in economic globalization has been accompanied by a state retreat process in the areas of social reproduction and social protection. This state withdrawal process largely shapes a specific pattern of proletarianization of Chinese labour and a specific capital-labour relationship which contribute to recent, and intensifying, migrant workers' struggles in China.
2012
Based on a review of divergent interpretations of migrant-worker protests in China, this article analyzes strike patterns during labor struggles in the summer of 2010. The analysis reveals (1) a shift toward more offensive demands for wage increases and (2) a high level of strike contagion. While these elements were evident to some extent in earlier struggles, the authors see their specific combination in 2010 as an indicator of an ongoing process of “class formation.” The strikes were centered on auto supplier factories, however, and this shows the limitations on cross-sector protest due to the fragmented conditions in China's heterogeneous industrial structure and a continuing ban on independent organization. Taking a broader perspective on the peculiarities of the strike movement, the authors discuss the impact on the government's comparably permissive stance toward the strike movement. This stance created favorable conditions for the proliferation of strikes. Attempts by state authorities to institutionalize worker conflict, while legitimizing the demand for higher wages, fall short of granting rights to organize independently and bargain collectively. Instead an opening has been created for worker militancy rather than integrating it into some authoritarian form of social compromise.
Strikes and labour relations in China
Article One of the Constitution of the People’s Republic of China (2004) could not be clearer. China is a “socialist state under the people’s democratic dictatorship led by the working class and based on the alliance of workers and peasants”. This apparent collective “exceptionality” of China stands in stark contrast to the dominant political ideologies of the current individualistic neo-liberal era of capitalist globalisation. However, when I look at China through a lens of labour relations and the class struggles they generate, the case for China’s “generality” – as opposed to “exceptionality” – hoves into view: it is very clear that the country is marked by high inequality, a poor implementation of labour laws and an obvious power imbalance between the forces of capital and the forces of labour relations in which the state mostly supports the former. Seen through this lens, China no longer resembles a state “led by the working class” but rather a state focused on containing one that is finding its voice. It is this contentious dynamic that I examine in this paper
The Chinese Labour Movement And Political Change in China
Over the past decade, the industrial relations system in China has made the country an attractive destination for global corporations due to its low wage rates, restrictive labour laws and the nonrecognition of independent trade unions and the right to strike. This has been the result of a unique industrial legacy of a praetorian political system coupled with the astigmatic ideology of a highly centralised political system dominated by a single party. This is all changing and changing quickly.
Journal of Labor and Society, 2018
This edited volume "The Emerging Industrial Relations of China" is an important piece of scholarship that presents some of the cutting edge research of Chinese labor studies. The majority of the contributors are China-based, working and researching directly within the field. What sort of industrial relations are emerging in China? This is the central question the editors and contributors seek to address, with a particular focus on the institution building to protect workers' interests and manage industrial disputes by collective responses since the passing of the Labor Contract law in 2008. Although there are nuanced views from the contributors and editors, overall the volume asserts that the piecemeal reforms of the Chinese industrial relations hinged on the state-led unions can provide some nontraditional but effective ways to represent and defend workers' interests. Not everyone may agree with the initial optimism of this volume toward the Chinese labor movement presided over by the increasingly authoritarian state. Nonetheless, this book provides plenty of food for thought, other than what we have read in the Anglo-American literature. The book's pluralist approach adopts a variety of theoretical frameworks besides institutional analysis, such as liberal labor market theory (Heery, 2016), structural and associational power (Silver, 2003), mobilization theory (McAdam, 1988), and so on. It draws on substantial and original field studies in China's labor scene, which has increasingly become a forbidden zone for foreign scholars. Independent surveys with a large number of samples are used to provide insight into the state of Chinese industrial relations, for instance, the Institute of Labour Studies survey 2013, by Remin University of China. In what follows, I would briefly highlight the kernel of argument in the chapters. Chapters 1-3 set the theoretical framework of the book with some broad perspective analysis of Chinese industrial relations by the editors. In Chapter 1 introduction, Brown draws mostly from the western liberal theories of industrial relations to provide a basis for the following chapters. These theories see industrial relations as one between employers and employees. This sets the book apart from other theoretical approaches, such as Marxism focusing on capital-labor relations, and Feminism emphasizing gender relations and social reproduction. Brown sees collective bargaining as the central role in maintaining harmonious relationships between the employers and workers. From this way of framing, the challenges faced by the Chinese workers, with an ambiguous and weak role played by the All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU), are not unique. While the ACFTU's status is problematic, often detached from the mass of workers (p. 64), trade unionism also has been on the decline in the West generally, particularly among the private sectors. However, this liberal framework has its limits in the context of the developing world, especially China, as Brown admits that the latter has far more extreme challenges than the West (p. 17). In Chapters 2 and 3, the editors seek to survey the landscape of Chinese industrial relations in a broad perspective. Chapter 2 provides some fascinating insights into the conservatism among some Chinese academics and party officials toward labor issues during China's transition to market economy. The debate between "Shanghai School" and "Beijing School" shows that some Chinese scholars saw labor rights legislation was "excessive protection for workers" (p. 27). The case of
The unrest and relative empowerment of the working class in contemporary China
METU Studies in Development, 2019
This paper puts forward three arguments regarding the nature and consequences of China's rising labor unrest. Firstly, China's rapid economic growth in the reform era was made possible by a large reserve army of labor, consisting mainly of semi-proletarianized migrant workers from the countryside. Secondly, the deepening proletarianization of and discrimination against migrant workers in recent years has led to a significant increase in labor movements. Finally, rising labor unrest has resulted in significant wage increases, the relative formalization of labor, and a significant decline in profitability.
Insurgency Trap: Labor Politics in Postsocialist China
Excerpt] This book, then, seeks to address a problem of the political economy of early twenty-first-century China: Why is it that in the more than ten years since the central government began to shift away from fullfledged marketization, migrant worker unrest has continued to grow apace? Why have the efforts of certain segments of the state to promote class compromise largely failed? Perhaps one might assume that the answer is simply that there has been collusion between the local state and capital, unions are weak, and therefore worker interests continue to be violated. Indeed, there is strong evidence that even if migrant workers' nominal wages increased in this period, the workers did not experience significant increases in real wages, and their wages relative to those of urban workers steadily declined (Golley and Meng 2011). But if this is the case, a second question immediately arises: Why is it that labor is strong enough to win concessions at the national and sometimes provincial or municipal level but not strong enough to allow migrant workers to significantly benefit from these victories or gain their recognition? In broad terms, I am interested in identifying what is particular about the labor politics of capitalist industrialization in a postsocialist political environment. In order to answer these questions, I focus on the state-controlled unions under the umbrella of the ACFTU and their relationship to migrant workers, capital, and other state agencies.
The Changing Nature of Labor Unrest in China
Industrial & Labor Relations Review, 2014
A qualitative shift is underway in the nature of labor protest in China. Contrary to prior literature that characterized strikes as being largely defensive in nature, the authors suggest that since 2008, Chinese workers have been striking offensively for more money, better working conditions, and more respect from employers. They explain these developments using a “political process” model that suggests economic and political opportunities are sending “cognitive cues” to workers that they have increased leverage, leading them to be more assertive in their demands. Such cues include a growing labor shortage, new labor laws, and new media openness. Their argument is supported by a unique data set of strikes that the authors collected, two case studies of strikes in aerospace factories, and interviews with a variety of employment relations stakeholders.
Getting Through the Hard Times Together? Chinese Workers and Unions Respond to the Economic Crisis
How do post-socialist unions respond to market crisis? And what are the implications of this response for labor representation? Drawing on literature on post-socialist labor and union democracy, I argue that economic crisis affects not just labor-capital and labor-state relations, but also the relationship between union representatives and workers. Such a dynamic is highlighted by an empirical account of the divergent activities of workers and All-China Federation of Trade Unions (ACFTU) unions in China following the economic crisis of 2008. While the union responded to mass unemployment with an administrative and policy-oriented strategy, workers took to the streets in increasing numbers. This divergence led to several instances of conflict, and, by 2010, it was possible to detect small but significant shifts in the union's approach to dealing with labor unrest.