Introduction: Bodies and Buildings in Motion (original) (raw)

SPACE, BODY AND MOVEMENT notes on the research of spatiality in architecture 1

My purpose with this text is to recuperate the theme of the spatial condition to the field of architectural theory. The spatial condition has been in general a secondary protagonist in the theory of architecture where, traditionally, the aesthetic and technological appreciation of buildings has by far dominated over their appreciation as spatial structures endowed with symbolic and use values that come from the way space is experienced. This spatial dimension of architecture is acknowledged, and has its performance scrutinized, in the work of different authors, from the end of the nineteenth century on. The work presented in what follows aims at circumscribing what is specific in this architectural knowledge and, moreover, to show that the theories given by these authors present a conceptual convergence, and often coincidence, so configuring today a clearly identifiable line of research. Yet this review has not the ambition of exhausting the variety of literature that has dealt with this subject. In fact, more important than these authors is the way the concepts they have presented, during this last century, have become articulated in the formulation of a theory of space. Moreover the ambition here is to raise in the reader -architect, researcher or student -the curiosity for the knowledge about the way spatiality works in architecture.

Moving (in) space : the role of the body in architectural experience

2020

Space, being omnipresent, is as much taken for granted as it is formative for the experience of everyday life. Acknowledging the experiential dimension of space, architecture has seen an increased interest in its lived quality, as opposed to pure formalism or functionalism. The phenomenological critique of architecture in particular, with its beginnings in the 1950s, has called for a commitment to the aspect of human experience, emphasising the role of the body. In this view, the question of the role of the body in how we experience architectural space arises. Any thinking about the experience of space is necessarily informed by how space itself is understood. Indeed, the conception of space has seen a significant shift within both culture and science since around the middle of the last century, and with it the way in which architects and artists deal with spatial relations. Based on the research combining a theoretical investigation with interviews and a central case study, it will...

MOVEMENT IN ARCHITECTURE

Movement in Architecture, 2019

The core proof to Earth’s very existence, movement governs the reality of everything around us. This thesis looks to examine the different iterations of movement through its different forms in the environment and its effects. This dissertation aims to re-examine the idea of human movement through space. The study look to explore movement beyond its literal connotation, as an emotional, sensory and contextual element in design. The intent is to utilize the resulting inferences to realise the power of architecture to move human lives, thereby creating a positive difference.

The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture

The experience of movement in the built form and space: A framework for movement evaluation in architecture, 2019

“Movement in architecture” is an organized system of various types of movements stimulated by specific architectural elements. This research was conducted through a qualitative-analytical method and empirical and bibliographical research methods with the aim to categorize different types of movements based on the explorer and observer relationships with the built space and form. So far, most of the related studies have focused on a few aspects of movement. In this article, the author tries not only to address circulation in architecture and visual movements but also the physiological psychology of motion, pictorial representation, and natural factors. The physical movement of built form and space is also considered more coherently and comprehensively, along with all stimulus factors and elements. Subsequently, this research presents a taxonomy in the form of an assessment table correlating with various types of movements along with their generator factors and architectural elements. The article conceptions are justified by a comparative analogy between two bridges: Khaju and Tabiat, representing 17th century and contemporary Iranian architecture, respectively.

Embodiment and Architecture: Reinterpreting Human-Body Dynamics Across Centuries

Civil Engineering and Architecture , 2024

Abstract The role of the human body in cognitive science approaches has often been overshadowed by the prevailing mindset of mind-body dualism within architectural theory over the course of centuries. Despite the body's crucial significance in cognitive viewpoints within architectural theory, it prompts us to reflect on its historical standing and cognitive function evolution. The inquiry lies in understanding how the body and its cognitive implications have shaped the progression of architectural theory throughout time. Through the lens of logical reasoning and a descriptive-analytical approach, this article endeavors to delve into the nuanced exploration of the body across various architectural epochs. By tracing the evolution of body interpretations from the tangible to the phenomenological realms, it scrutinizes the shifts in architectural ideation concerning the cognitive dimensions of the human body. Furthermore, this study investigates the influence of phenomenological perspectives on discussions surrounding bodily expressions and the adaptive alteration of individuals' perceptions of their corporeal presence in diverse real-world scenarios. Architects, albeit these transformations, persist in retaining a human-centric view, laying emphasis on geometric, formal, and numerical considerations in architectural compositions.

Architecture and the Body, Science and Culture, Contents & Introduction

Architecture and the Body, Science and Culture, 2018

The relationship of architecture to the human body is a centuries-long and complex one, but not always symmetrical. This book opens a space for historians of the visual arts, archaeologists, architects, and digital humanities professionals to reflect upon embodiment, spatiality, science, and architecture in pre-modern and modern cultural contexts. "Architecture and the Body, Science and Culture" poses one overarching question: How does a period's understanding of bodies as objects of science impinge upon architectural thought and design? The answers are sophisticated, interdisciplinary explorations of theory, technology, symbolism, medicine, violence, psychology, deformity, and salvation, and they have unexpected and fascinating implications for architectural design and history. The new research published in this volume reinvigorates the Western survey-style trajectory from Archaic Greece to post-war Europe with scientifically-framed, body-centered provocations.

Early Modern Spaces in Motion: Design, Experience, and Rhetoric (Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press, 2020)

2020

A forum for innovative research on the role of images and objects in the late medieval and early modern periods, Visual and Material Culture, 1300-1700 publishes monographs and essay collections that combine rigorous investigation with critical inquiry to present new narratives on a wide range of topics, from traditional arts to seemingly ordinary things. Recognizing the fluidity of images, objects, and ideas, this series fosters cross-cultural as well as multi-disciplinary exploration. We consider proposals from across the spectrum of analytic approaches and methodologies.

Move-tecture: A Conceptual Framework for Designing Movement in Architecture

IOP Conf. Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 2017

Along with the technological improvements in our age, it is now possible for the movement to become one of the basic components of the architectural space. Accordingly, architectural construction of movement changes both our architectural production practices and our understanding of architectural space. However, existing design concepts and approaches are insufficient to discuss and understand this change. In this respect, this study aims to form a conceptual framework on the relationship of architecture and movement. In this sense, the conceptualization of move-tecture is developed to research on the architectural construction of movement and the potentials of spatial creation through architecturally constructed movement. Move-tecture, is a conceptualization that treats movement as a basic component of spatial creation. It presents the framework of a qualitative categorization on the design of moving architectural structures. However, this categorization is a flexible one that can evolve in the direction of the expanding possibilities of the architectural design and the changing living conditions. With this understanding, six categories have been defined within the context of the article: Topological Organization, Choreographic Formation, Kinetic Structuring, Corporeal Constitution, Technological Configuration and Interactional Patterning. In line with these categories, a multifaceted perspective on the moving architectural structures is promoted. It is aimed that such an understanding constitutes a new initiative in the design practices carried out in this area and provides a conceptual basis for the discussions to be developed.