Classroom Practices for Vocabulary Enhancement in Prekindergarten: Lessons From PAVEd for Success (original) (raw)
Related papers
Sustained vocabulary-learning strategy instruction for english-language learners
2005
The study reported here examines the English language knowledge and performance of bilingual school children of Middle School age in Britain, in particular their acquisition and use of vocabulary. One of the chief premises of the research is that pupils from bilingual minority ethnic backgrounds suffer a major disadvantage while learning from the National Curriculum because they lack the necessary richness of word knowledge, accompanied by the conceptual frameworks expected in learning subjects such as science and geography. Furthermore, it is believed that by raising awareness among teachers and by the adoption of appropriate methods of vocabulary teaching founded on research, the vocabulary learning of bilingual pupils can be greatly increased. The aim of the study is to identify, describe and evaluate methods of vocabulary instruction currently used and to provide recommendations for suitable methods to be introduced. By means of an action research methodology implemented in a middle school, and with the joint participation of some members of staff and some pupils, classroom data was collected over a two and a half year period from teachers of science, geography and English and their pupils, supplemented with semi-structured interviews with teachers and support staff and conversations with children. These data provided material for a detailed analysis of exactly how individual words develop from first introduction into the pupils' active vocabulary.
This systematic review provides a comprehensive analysis of the empirical literature on the effectiveness of vocabulary instructional methods for English language learners (ELLs) in prekindergarten through 6th grade settings. Thus, a central goal of this study is to appraise the available research on vocabulary learning and assess intervention studies’ levels of evidence for effectiveness in order to make a critical assessment of the variables that are currently represented in the field. Specifically, the research questions guiding this systematic review are: (1) How do intervention studies developing L2 word-meaning acquisition with ELLs in pre-kindergarten through 6th grade settings vary in their methodological characteristics (i.e., research design, learners, instructional design and outcome)? (a) What are the studies’ levels of evidence for effectiveness based on their design and outcome characteristics? and (2) What is the impact of studies that meet requisite evidence standards on learners’ L2 word-meaning acquisition? A total of 18 studies meeting the inclusion criteria were identified. Independent coding of 20% of the articles (n=4) was completed, the results were cross-checked against the original codes, and further discrepancies in coding were resolved through discussion between the two coders. The final criteria were subsequently reapplied by the author to all studies in the review. Coding categories for each study were organized by four main characteristics: (1) design characteristics (i.e., random assignment, baseline equivalence, comparison group type); (2) learner characteristics (i.e., L1/L2 proficiency, SES, age and grade level); (3) treatment characteristics (i.e., focus of instruction, level of L1 support, word tier targeted, total instructional time, training, explicitness of instruction, contextual/definitional support, group size, and level of word exposure) and (4) outcome characteristics (i.e., outcome objective, type of measure, type of ability measured, modality, word tier assessed, and type of knowledge). Based on the studies’ design and outcome characteristics, their level of evidence for effectiveness was also examined. Subsequent analyses revealed that a large proportion of studies underreported information and did not meet evidence standards for effectiveness. Additionally, studies with available effect sizes for measures of breadth and depth of vocabulary knowledge revealed inconclusive evidence about the best instructional practices for ELLs due to the large variations among a limited number of studies in their instructional approach, learners, and outcome characteristics. An analysis of the merits and limitations of the reviewed studies reveals a number of methodological problems that threaten the validity and credibility of vocabulary research. These findings highlight the need for increased research in this field of study, particularly in revisiting existing practices to add to current understandings relating to vocabulary practices with ELLs. Additionally, this study points to specific issues in current research and provides recommendations for researchers seeking to address the significant knowledge gap in research that is centered on ELL vocabulary learning.
The Effects of 25 Years of Bilingual Education on Vocabulary Knowledge
2011
One of the most fundamental, yet often overlooked, challenges facing all language learners is that of acquiring sufficient vocabulary for their needs. This study seeks to determine what kind of vocabulary knowledge has been acquired by a group of UBD undergraduates who are products of the bilingual education system some 25 years after its inception in Brunei schools. The study also seeks to determine to what extent this knowledge will meet their needs for an English medium university programme. Paul Nation’s levels tests (receptive and controlled production) are used to measure their vocabulary. These tests are administered on entry to university and again after two years of their degree programme. Participants are also surveyed in an attempt to uncover their attitudes to, and practices for, vocabulary learning. The paper then considers the reasons for the findings, including the role of bilingual education, and whether or not the students are on target to meet the standards require...
Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 2020
Many children learning English as an additional language (EAL) possess lower levels of English vocabulary knowledge relative to their non-EAL English-speaking peers. Longitudinal work suggests that this group discrepancy does not decrease markedly over time as a result of regular classroom teaching. Twelve EAL learners with English vocabulary weaknesses took part in a low-intensity, 10week vocabulary intervention. Working one-to-one with speech and language therapy students, children took part in weekly activities designed to promote receptive and productive knowledge of 20 target words within the Tier-2 vocabulary category. When assessed on a bespoke word knowledge assessment, children made statistically significant gains between pretest and posttest in both receptive and productive knowledge of taught words, and maintained this knowledge six months later. Multi-component explicit vocabulary instruction offering opportunities for active engagement and discussion is thus presented as one potentially effective means of promoting the Tier-2 vocabulary knowledge of EAL learners in primary school in England.
Przegląd Badań Edukacyjnych Educational Studies Review, 2022
This paper discusses a vocabulary intervention programme for monolingual Polish children. Vocabulary instruction was conducted in a group of children aged 7-9 (N = 77) attending a primary school near Gdansk in Poland. Following a pre-test an intervention group (22 pupils receiving instruction over 10 weeks) and a control group (55 pupils) were selected. The taught vocabulary consisted of 20 Polish words. Additionally, another 20 words were carefully selected to form an untaught vocabulary list (control list). Although the intervention group did
Engaging Children with Useful Words: Vocabulary Instruction in a Third Grade Classroom
2007
This action research project investigated 2 different instructional procedures used for third grade students' vocabulary acquisition. We researched read-aloud trade books containing targeted vocabulary words with daily direct word learning strategies and compared that to a traditional definitional approach with 12 bilingual and 4 monolingual children. Instruction was limited to 6 words each week for 4 consecutive weeks. Findings suggested