Assessing Overall Competence Of Faculty: Ec Criterion 5 (original) (raw)
Related papers
A model for engineering faculty development
International Journal of Engineering Education, 2003
... The SUCCEED faculty development model calls for offering workshops and seminars to graduate students and post-doctoral fellows on topics such as addressing different student learning styles, effective lecturing techniques ... Use of team-based learning: 73% gave ...
Faculty teaching practices in an engineering education coalition
… , 1999. FIE'99. 29th …, 1999
This paper discusses the findings from a survey of engineering faculty at the eight colleges of engineering that make up SUCCEED, one of the National Science Foundation's engineering education coalitions. Faculty members were surveyed on their use of various teaching methods in their undergraduate classes. Findings show that faculty members who reported attending teaching seminars in their careers were more likely to use active learning methods regularly than those who had not attended any such seminars. Significant usage differences were also found based on the Carnegie classification of the respondents' schools, their primary job function (teaching, teaching/research, or administration), their involvement in SUCCEED-sponsored activities, their rank, and their sex.
1998
All engineering faculty members in the eight universities that comprise the SUCCEED Coalition were surveyed about their use of a variety of instructional methods and their perceptions about attitudes toward teaching on their campuses. The results provide a unique snapshot of engineering education at a transitional moment in its history. The same survey will be administered two years and four years from now. The results should provide an indication of the degree to which the SUCCEED faculty development program is meeting its objectives, which are to promote facility adoption of proven instructional methods and materials and to improve institutional support for effective teaching.
2004 Annual Conference Proceedings
An initiative to promote the formation of voluntary study groups amongst engineering faculty at Virginia Tech is described. The groups provide an opportunity for faculty to freely discuss and exchange their teaching ideas and collaborate with more and less experienced colleagues, thus reducing the isolation they often experience when facing instructional challenges. The formation of study groups centered in engineering departments has been encouraged through a structure independent of the normal department administration. As a result of this effort participation in study groups has rapidly risen and currently over one third of all engineering faculty participate. If only by this measure the initiative has had an impact on the overall quality of teaching in the College of Engineering
2014 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition Proceedings
Her research focuses on communication in engineering design, interdisciplinary communication and collaboration, design education, and gender in engineering. She was awarded a CAREER grant from the National Science Foundation to study expert teaching in capstone design courses, and is co-PI on numerous NSF grants exploring communication, design, and identity in engineering. Drawing on theories of situated learning and identity development, her work includes studies on the teaching and learning of communication, effective teaching practices in design education, the effects of differing design pedagogies on retention and motivation, the dynamics of cross-disciplinary collaboration in both academic and industry design environments, and gender and identity in engineering. Ms. Kelly J Cross, Virginia Tech Ms. Cross earned her Bachelor of Science in Chemical Engineering from Purdue University in 2007. She earned her Master's of Science in Materials Science and Engineering from the University of Cincinnati in 2011. Ms. Cross is currently in the fourth year of the Engineering Education PhD program at Virginia Tech and involved with multiple educational research projects with faculty and graduate students. Her research interests include teamwork and communication skills, assessment, diversity, and identity construction.
Key Issues Surrounding Faculty Development of Expertise In Instructional Design
Proceedings Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, 2005
Despite many successes in engineering education today, a need exists for transformational change that embraces current best-practices, meets expectations of industry, the NAE, NSF, and ABET, and produces faculty buy-in. This paper explores the following question: What are key elements faculty consider as they begin to develop expertise and implement the process of systematic instructional design? A qualitative case study of nine faculty participants in a five part workshop series was conducted. A holistic pattern analysis was performed on 217 pieces of data triangulated among a pre-workshop survey, focus group discussions, and document examination to reveal main themes. During the workshop series, a transformational shift towards a focus on outcome behaviors and skills rather than how to deliver content occurred in how faculty viewed their role in the delivery of instruction. Perceived benefits of utilizing systematic instructional design included the relevance of an outcomes based approach, elevated quality of instruction, and the utility of instructional design at multiple levels. These perceptions significantly outweighed perceived costs of time investment, frustration as learners, and risks due to the use of techniques outside of cultural norms.
Enhancement Of Faculty Design Capabilities
1996 Annual Conference Proceedings
A crucial factor affecting U. S. productivity is the decline in the quality of engineering design. The response of the Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology to the pressures to strengthen undergraduate design requirements has not only not improved design education significantly, but has resulted in more programs not meeting the established standards. Vital to the strengthening of the design requirement is the improvement of faculty design capabilities. The two-week workshop on Enhancement of Faculty Design Capabilities held at Southern Methodist University from July31-August 10, 1995 is part of a three-year plan for enhancing engineering design skills of faculty from all engineering disciplines. Engineering i%culty participating in this workshop developed and documented 70 design exercises for use in the engineering sciences: mechanics of solids, electrical theory, fluid mechanics, and transfer and rate mechanisms. A significant number of these exercises were developed for introduction into the first year course with the potential for follow-on activities in the engineering science courses. Emphasis was placed on developing design materials which could be integrated throughout the engineering curriculum and which were easily transportable to engineering programs at other institutions. The Need for Improving Design Education There is a widely held perception that U. S. industry's extended period of world dominance in product development, manufacturing innovation, process engineering, and productivity has ended. The relative decline of U. S. productivity and competitiveness can be attributed to several factors, including national fiscal policies, exchange rates, international labor rates, deficiencies in manufacturing, industrial management and accounting practices, unfair labor practices, and methods of generating capital. A crucial factor that is often overlooked is the decline in the quality of engineering design in U. S. industry. Engineering design is the crucial component in the product realization process, the means by which new products are conceived, developed, and brought to market. It has been estimated that 70% or more of the life cycle costs of a product are determined during design. Unfortunately, the overall quality of engineering design and engineering design education in the United States is inadequate. The National Research Council in its 1991 reportl "Improving Engineering Design: Designing for Competitive Advantage" includes in its observations: