Correlates of child abuse potential (original) (raw)

Abstract

Coercion theory provided the theoretical rationale for the present study. The hypothesis was that mothers" reports of child behavior problems and mothers" reports of external locus of control would be related to abuse potential. A total of 95 mother-child pairs were screened for child abuse potential during visits to a hospital-based pediatric clinic. Following brief interviews, mothers completed three measures: Milner's Child A buse Potential Inventory, Levenson's Locus of Control Scales, and the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. Perceptions of control by powerful others and by chance were related to abuse potential for mothers of both sexes. Mothers" reports of their sons" anxiety-withdrawal and conduct-disorder behavior problems were related to abuse potential. There was a significant association among lie scores, internality, and abuse potential for mothers o f female children. Mothers with high abuse potential reported significantly more behavior problems in their children. The findings were discussed in relation to coercion theory. In a series of studies during the last decade, Patterson (1980, 1982) and colleagues have examined the mother's role in child management. Coercion theory represents a collection of hypotheses derived from this group of studies to explain a cycle of aggressive parent-child behaviors occurring in problem families. Manuscript received in final form June 19, 1984. ~Portions of this paper were presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, DetrOit, April 1983. This research was conducted by the first author in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Ph.D. at the University of Miami under the direction of Drs. Keith G. Scott and Annette M. La Greca. The first author wishes to thank the members of the committee, Drs. Herbert C. Quay, Simon B. Miranda, Daryl Greenfield, and Julia Rosenkrans, for their many contributions. Also, special thanks to the University of Miami Child Protection Team for their continuous support and guidance, and special appreciation to the mothers and children who participated in the study. 217

Loading...

Loading Preview

Sorry, preview is currently unavailable. You can download the paper by clicking the button above.

References (20)

  1. Bee, H. L., Disbrow, M. A., Johnson-Crowley, N., & Barnard, K. (1981, April). Parent-child interaction during teaching in abusing and nonabusing families. Paper presented at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Boston.
  2. Burgess, R. L., & Conger, R. D. (1978). Family interaction in abusive, neglectful, and normal families. ChiM Development, 49(4), 1163-1173.
  3. Conger, R. F. (1981). Assessment of dysfunctional family systems. In B. Lashley & A. Kazdin (Eds.), Advances in clinical child psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 219-242). New York: Plenum Press.
  4. Draper, T. W. (1982). Sons, mothers, and externality: ls there a father effect? ChildStudy Jour- nal, 12(4), 271-280.
  5. Ellis, R. H., & Milner, J. S. (1981). Child abuse and locus of control. Psychological Reports, 48, 507-510.
  6. George, C., & Main, M. (1979). Social interactions of young abused children: Approach, avoidance and aggression. ChiM Development, 50(2), 306-318.
  7. Hetherington, E. M., Cox, M., & Cox, R. (1981). The aftermath of divorce. In E. M. Hethering- ton & R. D. Parke (Eds.), Contemporary readings in chiM psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 234-248). New York: McGraw-Hill.
  8. Hetherington, E. M., & Martin, B. (1979). Family interaction. In H. C. Quay & J. S. Werry (Eds.), Psychopathological disorders of childhood. New York: Wiley.
  9. Levenson, H. (1981). Differentiating among externality, powerful others and chance. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Research with the locus of control construct (Vol. 1, pp. 15-63). New York: Academic Press.
  10. Lewis, M., & Schaeffer, S. (1981). Peer behavior and mother-infant interaction in maltreated children. In M. Lewis & L. A. Rosenblum (Eds.), The uncommon chiM (Vol. 1, pp. 193-223). New York: Plenum Press.
  11. Martin, J. A. (1981). A longitudinal study of the consequences of early mother-infant interac- tion: A microanalytic approach. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child De- velopment, 46(3, Serial No. 190).
  12. Mash, E. J., Johnston, C., & Kovitz, K. (1983). A comparison of the mother-child interactions of physically abused and nonabused children during play and task situations. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 12(3), 337-346.
  13. Milner, J. S. (1980). The child abuse potential inventory: Manual. Webster, North Carolina: Psytec.
  14. Patterson, G. R. (1980). Mothers: The unacknowledged victims. Monographs of Society for Research in ChiM Development, 45(5, Serial No. 186).
  15. Patterson, G. R. (1982). Coercive family process: A social learning approach (Vol. 3). Eugene: Castalia.
  16. Quay, H. C. (1983). A dimensional approach to behavior disorder: The Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. School Psychology Review, 12, 244-249.
  17. Quay, H. C., & Peterson, D. R. (1983, April). Interim manual for the Revised Behavior Problem Checklist. (Available from H. C. Quay, Box 248074, University of Miami, Coral Ga- bles, Florida 33124.)
  18. Reid, J. B., Patterson, G. R., & Loeber, R. (1981). The abused child: Victim, instigator, or innocent bystander? Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, 29, 47-68.
  19. Robertson, K. R., & Milner, J. S. (1983). Construct validity of the Child Abuse Potential In- ventory. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39(3), 426-429.
  20. Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for external versus internal control of reinforce- ment. Psychological Monographs, 80(1, Whole No. 609).