Identity, representations, religion, and apologizing for past wrongdoings: Muslim discourse about Indonesia's 1965–66 massacres of communists (original) (raw)
Related papers
Using social psychological perspectives, this paper aims to (1) explore how communism was socially constructed in Indonesia and why communism attributes labeled to a person can lead to negative effects, such as social exclusions. (2) After that, it presents findings of our study explaining that reminding people that human is naturally good and kind can reduce the negative effects of the communism stigma. (3) This chapter also discusses issues of past maltreatments to people labeled as communists in Indonesia, and why asking the government to apologize on behalf of Indonesians has not succeeded so far – the government refuses to apologize. To this matter, it is argued that as a start, what can be done is apologizing to the victims of violence and injustice because of the communist party of Indonesia (PKI) stigma, and the offsprings who don’t know the political turbulence. From here, it may be possible that the truth can slowly be revealed.
ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2019
The political demise of the former Christian-Chinese governor of Jakarta, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (known as Ahok), has attracted much political commentary, both in Indonesia and abroad. Accused of blasphemy, Ahok faced unprecedented mass protests by Islamists during his re-election campaign in late 2016 and early 2017. Following his electoral defeat and subsequent imprisonment, debate about the relationship between Indonesia’s ethno-religious minorities and the Muslim majority intensified (Setijadi 2017). These complex discussions centred on a number of key questions. For instance, were the sentiments of the anti-Ahok protesters—often middle-class Muslims accompanied by their children—representative of religiously and racially prejudiced views held by the majority of Indonesian Muslims (Assyaukanie 2017), or were they part of a pious movement in defence of Islam (Fealy 2016; Weng 2016)? What was the relationship between Islamist world views and the protests? Did the former cause the latter (Lindsey 2016), or have the demonstrations hardened exclusivist attitudes (Scherpen 2017)? And finally, what are the socio-economic profiles of those who hold such views (Chaplin 2016)? These questions have since dominated the scholarly and broader discourse on Indonesian politics and society, with passionate disagreements among participants about how best to research the problem and how to interpret the findings.
ISEAS Yusof Ishak Institute, 2019
The political demise of the former Christian-Chinese governor of Jakarta, Basuki Tjahaja Purnama (or "Ahok"), has attracted much political commentary, both in Indonesia itself and from abroad. Accused of blasphemy, Ahok faced unprecedented Islamist mass protests amidst his re-election campaign in late 2016 and early 2017. Following his electoral defeat and subsequent imprisonment, debates about the relationship between Indonesia's ethno-religious minorities and the Muslim majority intensified (Setijadi 2017). These discussions have been complex, but centered on a number of key questions. For instance, were the anti-Ahok protesters-often middle class Muslims accompanied by their children-representative of religiously and racially prejudiced views held by the majority of Indonesian Muslims (Assyaukanie 2017), or where they part of a pious movement in the defense of the Islamic faith (Weng 2016; Fealy 2017)? What was the relationship between Islamist world views and the protests-did the former cause the latter (Lindsey 2016), or have the demonstrations hardened exclusivist attitudes (Scherpen 2016)? And finally, what are the socioeconomic profiles of those who hold such views (Chaplin 2016)? These questions have since dominated the scholarly and broader discourse on Indonesian politics and society, with passionate disagreements among its participants over how to best research the problem and how to interpret possible findings. In our own work on the subject (Mietzner and Muhtadi 2018; Mietzner, Muhtadi and Halida 2018), we have taken the view that in order to explore the attitudes of Indonesian Muslims, there is no better way than conducting scientifically solid opinion surveys. We believe that such an approach is, in this specific case, superior to ethnographic or other qualitative approaches that necessarily focus on a much smaller number of observed actors in limited locations. By contrast, nationwide surveys based on multistage random sampling (Marsden and Wright 2010) can provide a reliable snapshot of Indonesian Muslim attitudes. Moreover, as we have access to a data base containing multi-year data series, we are able to track changes in attitudes with much more precision than exclusively qualitative research could. In this contribution, we thus address the questions mentioned above based on a recent survey we conducted in August 2018, and identify long-term trends by comparing its data to similar surveys we and other researchers carried out in the past.
Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 2016
The current study investigates the role of individual and intergroup factors in predicting Muslims’ tendency to attribute domestic terrorism in Indonesia to an external cause (i.e., The West) or an internal cause (i.e., radical Islamist groups). The results (N = 308) showed that intergroup factors of symbolic threat and realistic threat directly increased the external attribution and conversely decreased the internal attribution. Within the context of the current research, symbolic threat refers to Muslims’ perception that the norms and values of the West undermine Islamic identity. Realistic threat denotes Muslims’ perception that the economy and technology of the West undermine Islamic power. The individual factor of Islamic fundamentalism, which has to do with Muslims’ belief in the literal interpretation of and strict guidelines to Islamic doctrines, indirectly predicted both external attribution and internal attribution of terrorism as hypothesized, via the extent to which Musl...
The Identity of Shi‘a Sympathizers in Contemporary Indonesia
JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM, 2008
This paper sheds some light on Indonesian Shi'a sympathizers, their particular relations among themselves as well as with others. Following the Iranian Revolution by the late 1970, Indonesian Muslims witnessed a remarkable religious enthusiasm marked by the proliferation of Shi'a literature. This, in turn, is followed by the establishment of Shi'a-based institutions, Islamic schools, publishers and associations over the regions. However, in a Sunni> majority country like Indonesia, the identity of Shi'a sympathizers is contested by various religious inclinations among themselves as well as with Indonesian Sunni> s. Due to strong suspicion from the Sunni> s, the outward appearance of Indonesian Shi'i identity is not as visible as the Sunni> s. It goes without saying that public discourse disappears. Some efforts to communicate with broader scope of Indonesian Muslims have been made by Shi'a sympathizers, especially among new generations, in order to strengthen their community as well as carry out a more open and productive dialog with the Sunni> s.
Proceedings of the Social and Humaniora Research Symposium (SoRes 2018), 2019
This study aims (1) to describe how radical-muslim groups representate Indonesian democratic leader in Indonesia; (2) to identify the implication from the way they representate system of democracy. To get these aims, we collected data, i.e., postings on the websites they managed. We focus on Jamā'ah Anṣāru Tawḥīd (JAT) and Ḥizbut Taḥrīr Indonesia (HTI) as representatives of radical-muslim groups, indicated by democracy refusal. We analyze their postings by adopting Leeuwen's model of discourse analysis. We find that JAT representate democracy as a "religion". For JAT, democratic leaders are "Islam apostates", "kāfir", "ṭaghūt". Meanwhile, HTI regard democracy as an instrument for capitalists or colonialists. They regard Indonesia democratic leaders as a colonialist's cat's paw. We conclude that radical muslim groups have different perspectives and rationale in representing and delegitimizing leaders within democracy context. Language functions as a structure to oppose, delegitimize democratic leaders. Even more, the practice of language can be used to legitimize violence. For example, construction of "democracy as a religion" and "leader as a kāfir" legitimize sacred violence, e.g. terrorism.
Jurnal Komunikasi Indonesia, 2018
Indonesians are taught by the government that communism is a devil trying to rip the country's democratic and religious values. The propaganda started with a 'coup attempt' perpetrated by the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI) on September 30, 1965 that left several army high ranking officers killed. The putsch then justified a state-supported genocide throughout the country that claimed up to 1.5 million of suspected PKI supporters. Whether the coup attempt happened and who masterminded the tragedy has remained unanswered, and the victims have yet to find justice until now. Movements to demand truth, reconciliation and the state's formal apology for this travesty have been going on for years without concrete results. Despite increasing media coverage and effort to provide another side of the story, public opinions and attitude are relatively unchanged. This research aims to find how counter-frames of the social movements affect people's political opinion formation process; whether counter-frames can surpass existing common knowledge; and whether human agency can be formed in this specific case. It is discovered that counter-frames can affect one's understanding and stance in various degrees depending on their initial proximity, level of interest, and knowledge about the issue. This research also finds that among Collective Action Frames, agency is the most influential source of injustice and the party regarded as the enemy will only open a new discourse and change public opinion but are not enough to make people act. Publik Indonesia diajari oleh pemerintah bahwa komunisme adalah iblis yang mencoba merobek nilai-nilai demokrasi dan agama. Propaganda dimulai dengan sebuah 'usaha kudeta' oleh Partai Komunis Indonesia (PKI) pada tanggal 30 September 1965 yang membunuh beberapa petinggi militer Perstiwa tersebut Putsch kemudian menjadi pembenar genosida yang didukung pemerintah di seluruh negeri yang menewaskan hingga 1,5 juta orang yang dituh sebagai pendukung PKI. Bagaimana upaya kudeta tersebut terjadi, siapa yang berada di balik tragedi belum terjawab, dan korban belum menemukan keadilan sampai sekarang. Gerakan menuntut kebenaran, rekonsiliasi, dan permintaan maaf resmi dari negara untuk peristiwa ini telah berlangsung bertahun-tahun tanpa hasil yang nyata. meskipun liputan dan upaya media meningkat untuk memberikan sisi lain dari cerita tersebut, opini publik dan sikap relatif tidak berubah. Tujuan penelitian ini mengetahui bagaimana kontra-frame gerakan sosial mempengaruhi proses pembentukan opini politik masyarakat; apakah counter-frame bisa melampaui pengetahuan umum yang ada; dan apakah agen manusia dapat dibentuk dalam kasus khusus ini. Hasil penelitian menemukan, kontra-frame dapat mempengaruhi pemahaman dan pendirian seseorang dalam berbagai tingkat tergantung pada jarak awal, tingkat kepentingan, dan pengetahuan mereka mengenai masalah ini. Penelitian ini juga menemukan bahwa di antara Collective Action Frames, agensi adalah yang paling berpengaruh sebagai sumber ketidakadilan dan pihak yang dipandang bersalah (enemy) hanya akan membuka wacana baru dan mengubah opini publik namun tidak cukup untuk membaut orang bertindak. Agensi,bingkai, bingkai tandingan, bingkai tindakan bersama, G30S/PKI, pembentukan opini politik Agency, framing, counter-frames collective action frames, G30S/PKI, political opinion formation.
Support for Ethno-religious Violence in Indonesia
2015
This study focused on the relationship between ethno-religious identification and support for intergroup violence in Indonesia. It employed a cross-cultural comparative research design involving Muslim and Christian respondents from different ethnic groups in two research areas. One of these areas, Ambon, experiences frequent eruptions of inter-group violence, while the other, Yogyakarta, is relatively peaceful; while disputes have occurred occasionally, they have not led to massive intergroup violence. This research used a mixture of quantitative and qualitative approaches This study finds stronger identification with religion than with ethnicity. Muslims show greater ethno-religious identification than Christians. It also presents evidence for the proposition regarding religiocentrism in which a positive evaluation of the religious in-group is related to in-group identification and induces derogatory attitudes towards out-groups. The findings are also consistent with propositions ...